Quote:


Yeah actually, KG is decent for White, at least the Bishop's Gambit.  I would look at that if my motto were "Gambits Dammit!"  I regret I can't similarly recommend the Danish, which I believe to be unsound.

One other aspect of the scotch is that you can gambit the pawn (which you seem to enjoy ).
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4 Bc4
-4 .. Bc5 allows for wild play with c3, 0-0 or even Ng5
-4 .. Nf6 allows the Max Lange after 0-0 (I dont trust the Nxe4 variation for white so I dont play it in a normal game) or the modern variation with 5 e5, which is quite tricky to meet for black. I played this a couple of times as you can reach it from the Two knights defense as well.
Most books dealing with these variations are usually based on the Giuoco/TKD, so you wont find them in a book on the scotch.

Another thing is that you can answer the Petrov with 3 Nc3 though I dont know much about variations there.

Hello All,
I've had fun playing the line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 ed 4.Nd4 Bc5 5.Be3 Qf6 6.Nb5!? (Blumenfeld Attack) after seeing an article in NIC 2003/7.  I'm not sure I would want to play it against strong opposition, but at the local club level...interesting games. Any thoughts?
Regards

In Danish Dynamite Müller and Vogt break a lance for 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2. This might cause Black some problems.

Quote:


Agreed.  I don't think the Scotch can serve as a complete repertoire for White against 1 ... e5.  I would be inclined to stick with the standard mover order and find something else with which to confront the Petroff.

You could try to avoid the Petroff with the move order 1.e4 e5 2.d4!? exd4 3.Nf3 when 3...Nf6 transposes to a line that is though to be inferior (Black would normally meet 3.d4 in the Petroff with 3...Nxe4! rather than 3...exd4?!).

The problem is that Black can lob in 3...Bb4†!? when 4.c3 dxc3 5.Nxc3 tranposes to a Goring Gambit after an eventual ...Nc6 (which it is hard for Black to avoid).  On the plus side, it has forced black to accept the gambit, avoiding the Capablance Defence with [1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.c3] 4...d5.  On the minus side, it has robbed White of the opportunity to play it as a double pawn sac [1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.c3 dxc3 5.Bc4!?].

As for the Scotch itself, I have my doubts.  The main lines with 4...Nf6 seem pretty easy for Black to me.  And 4...Bc5 ain't bad either.

I don't have either the book or a set in front of me at the moment but there is a line in Sam Collins recent repertoire book which left me puzzled: it is in the ...Bc5/...Qf6 line and Black has a bishop on d4 and White plays Ne2 to get rid of it, but no mention is made of the possibility of ...Bxb2, simply snatching a pawn.  I had a look at the position and was very sceptical as to whether White had sufficient compensation.

Before Kasparov both Dutch GM's Timman and Van der Wiel have played it with success. The Scotch is still a cornerstone of the latter's repertoire.
It was an important reason for me to give up 1...e5. But after reading Gutman's 4...Dh4 in der Schottischen Partie I consider to take up the challenge again - but I am doubting for more than a year already.
The Scotch is the best Open Game for White after the Ruy Lopez. Only problem: the Petrov. The Scotch is in any case much more sensible than the BDG ....