Quote:bonsai What about the move order:
1.e4 d5 2.xd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Nf3 e6 7.Bd2 Qc7?
By delaying Nf6 black has avoided the discovery trick which results in damaged pawns or an offside queen. This move order seem to be fairly resilient.
That is a very passive position for black, even with 7...Qb6 it's nothing I'd ever want to play as black. Basically black is sitting back, not doing anything himself and hoping that white won't be able to convert his space & development advantage. E.g. 8.Qe2 Nf6 9.0-0-0 Nbd7 10.Ne5 is assessed as +/- by Wahls. It's not an automatic win for white, but as I said black is very passive.
Oh, and in the above move order I would argue that white should play 6.Bd2 (but of course black can play 6...Qb6 or 6...Qc7 there, too, white doesn't have to play Nf3 too ealry here, even 7.Qe2 is good).
Quote:The knight on e2 is actually fullfilling a number of duties, supporting Nc3, supporting Bf4 and ready to go to g3 with tempo.
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6 7.Bf4 Nf6 looks like blacks best.
7... Ne7 looks a bit too slow, blocking in the bishop.
Well, 7...Ne7 is hardly necessary now, the circumstances under which one would play it are after 7.0-0 Nd7 8.Ng3 Bg6 9.f4 Ne7.
Quote:The bishop does not appear to have a good square to clear to since 7...Bb4 8.a3 and there goes the bishop pair and any congestion white might have had. Nh6 looks insane if black wants a future on the kingside. On the plus side 7...Nf6 8.Qd2 can be met with ..Bb4 and an ending where black has better structure and white has the bishop pair.
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6 7.Bd2 and now:
7..Moving the Bf8 drops the bishop loses the bishop pair.
7..Nd7 8.0-0 0-0-0 looks insane.
All roads lead to Nf6 and Qc7.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qd8 9.Nxf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 looks a little better for white.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qc7 9.Nxf6 xf6 is remniscant of a certain caro variation only white is better developed though not with an optimal setup.
7.Qc7 8.Bf4 and whites development taking on mythical proprtions though black still has scandinavian solidity.
8..Bd6 9.Bxd6 Qxd6 trades pieces.
8...Qmove leaves bishop on f4 preventing a pawn rush but I think black is getting to far behind in development.
What is wrong with 7..Nd7 8.0-0 Ngf6? Black really doesn't have to play 8...0-0-0 here.
I also don't really like 4.d4 c6, I know that it's played a lot, but in my opinion 4.d4 Nf6 is much more flexible for black (as I said above, one can forget about 5.Bc4 after that)
Quote:3)e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Nd7 9. g4 Bg6 10. f4. I stopped payng attention after a peek at how both games continued. Black's position is best evaluated as sucky although some might disagree and instead call it crappy. Who knew that the half hearted d pawn push carried such venom? It appears standard scandinavian play leads to terrible positions after d3. Black will have to settle for one of the above lines.
Not quite sure what you are saying in the end (which two lines???). But, yes, 4.Bc4 + 5.d3 is very dangerous. Although if one does not fear it then 4.Bc4 c6 5.d4 (best in my opinion if black commits to 4...c6, after 5.d3 black could now hold back the g8 knight for a while and see where it ought to go) 5...Bf5 6.Bd2 is one option to avoid some of the dangers.
Maybe after 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Bf5 (I suppose there is no way of avoiding Bf5 without admitting that white is better, is there?) 8. h3 black should play 8...h5?
If that's unpleasant, too, then there's the more obscure answers to 4.Bc4, e.g. 4...Nf6 5.d3 Nc6 6.Bd2 Qf5 or even 4...Nc6 5.d3 Ne5. I mean, in general, does black really have to play c7-c6 in the d2-d3 variations anyway?