Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Busting the Scandinavian (Read 46620 times)
Dzambus
Junior Member
**
Offline


Let's play chess...

Posts: 65
Location: Poland
Joined: 12/07/04
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #8 - 08/15/05 at 11:43:34
Post Tools
Hi, i have a question

1)e4 d5
2)e:d5 Q:d5
3)Nc3  Qa5
4)d4    Nf6
5)Nf3  c6
6)Bd2

Now instead of 6...Bf5 some books give 6...Qb6! (their exclamation mark, not mine )

and  7 Bc4 Bf5 8 O-O

but what about c2 pawn sacrifice 8.Qe2 ?

what should Black play now?


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
lost highway
Senior Member
****
Offline


I may be crazy.

Posts: 471
Joined: 06/17/05
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #7 - 08/13/05 at 20:18:05
Post Tools
No.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Teyko
Full Member
***
Offline


Gambits Dammit

Posts: 247
Location: Scotland
Joined: 10/01/03
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #6 - 08/13/05 at 20:12:27
Post Tools
So is it true that the scandanavian is busted?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #5 - 08/13/05 at 05:09:46
Post Tools
Quote:
bonsai What about the move order:
1.e4 d5 2.xd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4  Bf5 6.Nf3 e6 7.Bd2 Qc7?
By delaying Nf6 black has avoided the discovery trick which results in damaged pawns or an offside queen. This move order seem to be fairly resilient.

That is a very passive position for black, even with 7...Qb6 it's nothing I'd ever want to play as black. Basically black is sitting back, not doing anything himself and hoping that white won't be able to convert his space & development advantage. E.g. 8.Qe2 Nf6 9.0-0-0 Nbd7 10.Ne5 is assessed as +/- by Wahls. It's not an automatic win for white, but as I said black is very passive.

Oh, and in the above move order I would argue that white should play 6.Bd2 (but of course black can play 6...Qb6 or 6...Qc7 there, too, white doesn't have to play Nf3 too ealry here, even 7.Qe2 is good).

Quote:
The knight on e2 is actually fullfilling a number of duties, supporting Nc3, supporting Bf4 and ready to go to g3 with tempo.
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6 7.Bf4 Nf6 looks like blacks best.
7... Ne7 looks a bit too slow, blocking in the bishop.

Well, 7...Ne7 is hardly necessary now, the circumstances under which one would play it are after 7.0-0 Nd7 8.Ng3 Bg6 9.f4 Ne7.

Quote:
The bishop does not appear to have a good square to clear to since 7...Bb4 8.a3 and there goes the bishop pair and any congestion white might have had. Nh6 looks insane if black wants a future on the kingside. On the plus side 7...Nf6 8.Qd2 can be met with ..Bb4 and an ending where black has better structure and white has the bishop pair.

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6  7.Bd2 and now:
7..Moving the Bf8 drops the bishop loses the bishop pair.
7..Nd7 8.0-0 0-0-0 looks insane.
All roads lead to Nf6 and Qc7.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qd8 9.Nxf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 looks a little better for white.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qc7 9.Nxf6 xf6 is remniscant of a certain caro variation only white is better developed though not with an optimal setup.
7.Qc7 8.Bf4 and whites development taking on mythical proprtions though black still has scandinavian solidity.
8..Bd6 9.Bxd6 Qxd6 trades pieces.
8...Qmove leaves bishop on f4 preventing a pawn rush but I think black is getting to far behind in development.


What is wrong with 7..Nd7 8.0-0 Ngf6? Black really doesn't have to play 8...0-0-0 here.

I also don't really like 4.d4 c6, I know that it's played a lot, but in my opinion 4.d4 Nf6 is much more flexible for black (as I said above, one can forget about 5.Bc4 after that)

Quote:
3)e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Nd7 9. g4 Bg6 10. f4. I stopped payng attention after a peek at how both games continued. Black's position is best evaluated as sucky although some might disagree and instead call it crappy. Who knew that the half hearted d pawn push carried such venom? It appears standard scandinavian play leads to terrible positions after d3. Black will have to settle for one of the above lines.

Not quite sure what you are saying in the end (which two lines???). But, yes, 4.Bc4 + 5.d3 is very dangerous. Although if one does not fear it then 4.Bc4 c6 5.d4 (best in my opinion if black commits to 4...c6, after 5.d3 black could now hold back the g8 knight for a while and see where it ought to go) 5...Bf5 6.Bd2 is one option to avoid some of the dangers.

Maybe after  1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Bf5 (I suppose there is no way of avoiding Bf5 without admitting that white is better, is there?) 8. h3 black should play 8...h5?

If that's unpleasant, too, then there's the more obscure answers to 4.Bc4, e.g. 4...Nf6 5.d3 Nc6 6.Bd2 Qf5 or even 4...Nc6 5.d3 Ne5. I mean, in general, does black really have to play c7-c6 in the d2-d3 variations anyway?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bob000
Guest


Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #4 - 08/12/05 at 15:59:18
Post Tools
bonsai What about the move order:
1.e4 d5 2.xd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4  Bf5 6.Nf3 e6 7.Bd2 Qc7?
By delaying Nf6 black has avoided the discovery trick which results in damaged pawns or an offside queen. This move order seem to be fairly resilient.


The knight on e2 is actually fullfilling a number of duties, supporting Nc3, supporting Bf4 and ready to go to g3 with tempo.
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6 7.Bdf4 Nf6 looks like blacks best.
7... Ne7 looks a bit too slow, blocking in the bishop. The bishop does not appear to have a good square to clear to since 7...Bb4 8.a3 and there goes the bishop pair and any congestion white might have had. Nh6 looks insane if black wants a future on the kingside. On the plus side 7...Nf6 8.Qd2 can be met with ..Bb4 and an ending where black has better structure and white has the bishop pair.

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 e6  7.Bd2 and now:
7..Moving the Bf8 drops the bishop loses the bishop pair.
7..Nd7 8.0-0 0-0-0 looks insane.
All roads lead to Nf6 and Qc7.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qd8 9.Nxf6 Qxf6 10.0-0 looks a little better for white.
7..Nf6 8.Nd5 Qc7 9.Nxf6 xf6 is remniscant of a certain caro variation only white is better developed though not with an optimal setup.
7.Qc7 8.Bf4 and whites development taking on mythical proprtions though black still has scandinavian solidity.
8..Bd6 9.Bxd6 Qxd6 trades pieces.
8...Qmove leaves bishop on f4 preventing a pawn rush but I think black is getting to far behind in development.

Of these two lines I think the latter is actually better. It takes an extra tempo to get to f4 but black has trouble finding a good spot for his queen. Back to a5 and it's white who's up a tempo. Wink

Top
1)Can black get away with a e5 setup after d3? Maybe with the bishop remaining on c8. Hmm. No, it looks dangerous. Then again I don;t have Fritz on me.
2)Can black keep the bishop on c6 and argue that e3 is insufficiently agressive without a bishop to hook against. (Though now that I think about it even after white expends a tempo plaing d4 it looks like a Caro line where white has accelerated development)
3)e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Nd7 9. g4 Bg6 10. f4. I stopped payng attention after a peek at how both games continued. Black's position is best evaluated as sucky although some might disagree and instead call it crappy. Who knew that the half hearted d pawn push carried such venom? It appears standard scandinavian play leads to terrible positions after d3. Black will have to settle for one of the above lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #3 - 08/11/05 at 21:10:44
Post Tools
Here is an interesting way to pose a few problems to Scandanavian players. Enjoy:

[Event "6th ch-EURw"]
[Site "Chisinau MDA"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[White "Houska,Jo"]
[Black "Vasilieva,M"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2334"]
[BlackElo "2124"]
[ECO "B01"]
[Round "1"]

1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Bd2 Qc7 7. Qe2 Bf5 8. h3 Nbd7 9. g4 Bg6 10. f4 h6 11. O-O-O Nb6 12. Bb3 Nfd5 13. f5 Bh7 14. Nf3 O-O-O 
15. Rde1 Bg8 16. Qe5 Qd7 17. Nxd5 Nxd5 18. c4 Nc7 19. Qa5 f6 20. Qxa7 Qxd3 21. Re3 Qd7 22. Rd1 e5 23. fxe6 Qe7 24. Bc2 Qc5 25. Qa4 Bd6 26. Bf5 Kb8 27. Re4 Be7 28. Be3 Rxd1+ 29. Qxd1 Qa5 30. Qd7 Qb4 31. c5 1-0

[Event "36th Olympiad"]
[Site "Calvia ESP"]
[Date "2004.??.??"]
[White "Short,N"]
[Black "Liu Dede"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2687"]
[BlackElo "2397"]
[ECO "B01"]
[Round "11"]

1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Bc4 Nf6 5. d3 c6 6. Qe2 Bf5 7. Bd2 Qc7 8. h3 e6 9. g4 Bg6 10. f4 Be7 11. Nf3 Nbd7 12. O-O-O Nb6 13. Rde1 Kf8 14. Bb3 Bd6 
15. Ne5 Bxe5 16. Qxe5 Qxe5 17. fxe5 Nfd7 18. Ne4 Kg8 19. d4 h5 20. g5 Bxe4 21. Rxe4 Nd5 22. Rf1 g6 23. Bxd5 cxd5 24. Ref4 Rh7 25. Bb4 Nb8 26. Bd6 Nc6 27. R1f3 Rd8 28. b3 Rd7 29. Kd2 Ne7 30. Bxe7 Rxe7 31. Rc3 Kg7 32. Rc8 Rh8 33. Rxh8 Kxh8 34. Rf3 Kg8 35. Rc3 Kf8 
36. a4 Ke8 37. Rc8+ Kd7 38. Ra8 a6 39. Kc3 Kc6 40. Kb4 Rc7 41. c4 dxc4 42. bxc4 Kd7 43. Rb8 Kc6 44. a5 Kd7 45. d5 exd5 46. cxd5 Rc1 47. Rxb7+ Ke8 48. Ra7 Kf8 49. Rxa6 Rh1 50. Rf6 Rxh3 51. e6 Rg3 52. Rxf7+ Ke8 53. a6 1-0

I like the idea of Pawn Storming the black Kingside, it seems quite promising.

Toppylov Grin
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #2 - 08/11/05 at 07:24:47
Post Tools
Quote:

3...Qa5 Move orders move orders. What are the linked moves? (By this I mean if white plays x black better play y or white can punish with z) 
My current setup up is:
d4/ Bc5/ Ne2/ Bd2 against c6/Bf4/Nf6. After 7...e6 the queen wastes more time on 9..Qxf6 or the pawn structure is damaged on xf6. After 7...Qc7 8.Bf4 the bishop moves again but the so does the queen and she has trouble finding a good square. Perhaps better is forgoing Bd2 and playing d4/Bc5/Ne2/0-0 against c6/Bf4/Nf6. Now e6 is met with Bf4. Unless I am missing a compelling Nf3 setup black can likely get this anyway by delaying Nf6. I suspect this setup is not most challenging but rather aimed at natural black moves, though I have obtained significant advantage against a few masters. What are the most challenging Nf3 setups (and move orders of course)

While your post is quite difficult to read, I believe you are suggesting to play
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 c6 5.Bc4 Bf5 6.Ne2 
In that move order black should avoid 6...Nf6 and can play 6...e6 leaving the options Ng8-e7 and Ng8-h6 open to counter the possible white Ng3 + f2-f4-f5 plan. Playing 6.Bd2 (or 7.Bd2) here is fairly harmless, I think, and black could probably just sidestep with his queen, because white is not very well placed to exploit another loss of time by black. If black plays as above, 6.Bd2 planning d4-d5 as soon as possible is strong.

However here and even more so after 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 Nf6 the move 5.Nf3 is really the main line and that's for a good reason (5.Bd2 is "just" fairly interesting, but e.g. 5.Bc4 is just no good now).

Against 5...Bg4 the main line with 6.h3 Bh5 7.g4 Bg6 8.Ne5 is clearly best and against 5...Bf5 (or 5...c6 followed by 6...Bf5) the lines with Bc4+Bd2+Nd5 (followed by Nxf6) are the ones that pose the greatest problems for black.

My impression is that white has a chance of getting an advantage that is possibly slightly larger than the one he is usually entitled to in more mainline openings.

Quote:

Some might scoff and say the scandinavian is too sound to be refuted Englund gambit style. They may be right but if something as main line as the Open Lopez contains a Ng5 then there ought to be was white can obtain strong presure against the Scandinavian.


It's difficult to say what white can achieve, but particularly in the Qa5 system black is playing a dangerous game of trying to get easy development in exchange for giving white a lead in development. 

PS: I'm sure someone will soon go on about the merits of 4...e5, but it's a move I've never personally liked much (that's without saying anything about its objective merits), but potentially one can get rid of that possibility by playing 4.Nf3 followed by 5.d4?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Busting the Scandinavian
Reply #1 - 08/09/05 at 19:58:47
Post Tools
Now here is a thread that one can sink ones teeth into. 

I will post some concrete lines when time and inclination permits.

Tops Grin
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Arthur
Guest


Busting the Scandinavian
08/09/05 at 07:34:08
Post Tools
I believe x suggested we start such a thread and since NCO is (rather unusually) not too useful I'm up for hearing what everyone's opinion of the strongest lines for white are. I'm also interested in scandinavian players' opinions on what those strongest lines are and how they meet them. (Though I'm not terribly interested in how can just "play natural moves without knowing theory", how "most white players don't play the best moves and so black equalizes easily, and other such statements in a certain 100 post topic.)
After 1.e4 d5 2.xd5 Nf6 I've never had trouble after 3.d4, obtaining an easy edge after Nx, Qx and Bg4.
After 2...Qxd4 3.Nc3 we have
3...Qd6 I suspect the key here is a move order that forces a6/c6 followed by g3/Ne2 and Bf4. g3 seems a bit slow but I've herd someone mention it was Emms recomendation and I can see a fianchetto being useful against 0-0-0. Isn't it a bit too slow for advantage against 0-0 plans by black though? Ne2 is puts question to Black's light squared bishop after Ng3 and can support a rush with the f pawn. Is  there significant downside?

3...Qa5 Move orders move orders. What are the linked moves? (By this I mean if white plays x black better play y or white can punish with z) 
My current setup up is:
d4/ Bc5/ Ne2/ Bd2 against c6/Bf4/Nf6. After 7...e6 the queen wastes more time on 9..Qxf6 or the pawn structure is damaged on xf6. After 7...Qc7 8.Bf4 the bishop moves again but the so does the queen and she has trouble finding a good square. Perhaps better is forgoing Bd2 and playing d4/Bc5/Ne2/0-0 against c6/Bf4/Nf6. Now e6 is met with Bf4. Unless I am missing a compelling Nf3 setup black can likely get this anyway by delaying Nf6. I suspect this setup is not most challenging but rather aimed at natural black moves, though I have obtained significant advantage against a few masters. What are the most challenging Nf3 setups (and move orders of course)

3...Qd8 NCO gives convincing lines against g6 and Ng4 ideas but what about a Bc5? Natural moves give white a healthy lead in development against a fairly solid setup but what is the BEST way for white to secure an advantage.

3....Qe5+ Sure Ne2 is the way to go, cutting short Black's plan of playing c6/Qc7 and trying to reach a Qa5 line with the White bishop on Be2 instead of Bc5.

Yes. I'm slightly partial to Ne2 but thats only because it trips up black's plans slightly and because NCO is not very detailed with the scandinavian so I don't know other challenging plans . . .yet.

Some might scoff and say the scandinavian is too sound to be refuted Englund gambit style. They may be right but if something as main line as the Open Lopez contains a Ng5 then there ought to be was white can obtain strong presure against the Scandinavian.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo