Quote:Thank you Bladez for pointing out my error.
The game is thematically very similar to the Tarrasch, and is probably better for Black than the formal Tarrasch because White has committed his Bishop to f4 and pawn to e3. I saw the position from when Black had his pawn on d4 vs a pawn on e4 and made the very wrong assumption that it came from a Tarrasch.
That Black had difficulties in a line that is much more respectable than the Tarrasch proper is even worse news than my mistake!
@ Smyslov
The Semi Tarrasch is different and the QG declined (other lines) proper even more. Just how different they are is something you dont seem to understand. And it seems you have not played/know both of them (semi and Tarrasch proper)
as black
at a decent competent level.
Those of us who have played them know there is much more activity for Black in the Tarrasch proper. Another point. White also has Bf4, e2-e3 set-ups in the Tarrasch proper. Third, the move order used by Morozevich does not favor black if he is looking to set up like the Tarrasch proper. It only helps him to try to achieve set ups in the QG declined or Semi if that's what he wants.
I can show you specifically what I mean, but you come across as a person who knows what your talking about (at least you try) in the Tarrasch. But if you are humble enough to ask what I mean, I will be glad to show you AND put all this behind and extend a hand of friendship.
I mean, as it now, it all looked like a poor attempt to save face after I pointed out you were wrong about saying what you said of Topalov and the Tarrasch.