|
Like Willempie, I was under the impression that, after 4 ...Bc5, 5 0-0 d6(!) (5 ...Nf6 is also obviously possible, with a likely transposition to a Giuoco Piano) was rather inferior for White (6 c3 Bg4!) and 5 c3, the Scotch Gambit, clearly best. The material on ChessPub seems to bear this out -- can anyone confirm or contradict this? After 5 c3, 5 ...Nf6 will not necessarily lead to a Giuoco Piano, though it probably will: instead of 6 e5 or 6 cd White could play 6 0-0, when after 6 ...Ne4 (6 ...dc!? unclear?) we have a Two Knights (with 4 d4). 6 Bg5 and 6 b4 have also been seen, the latter claiming a distinguished scalp in double-quick time in Romero Holmes--Estremera Panos, Leon 1989. These may not be dangerous, but I'd still like to know what the best defence is. As an alternative to 5 ...Nf6, 5 ...d3 has been widely criticised, but, like Keene & Jacobs in their 1996 book on 1 ...Nc6 systems, I'd like to know why. After 6 b4 Bb6 7 0-0 d6 8 a4 a6 9 Qb3 White may have an initiative, but why is it dangerous? After 9 ...Qe7 10 a5 Ba7 neither 11 Bg5 Nf6 nor 11 b5 ab appear to offer White an advantage. Can anyone tell me what, if anything, I'm missing here?
|