Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Carlsen or Karjakin? (Read 10404 times)
player2006
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 66
Joined: 07/06/06
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #19 - 11/22/06 at 20:08:03
Post Tools
J-dog wrote on 11/20/06 at 16:53:56:
Kaspy seems to have taken a liking towards Carlsen, even doing one training session with him.  You know you're special when the greatest player of all time gives you a training session!


Yes. Kasparov has analysed a number of Carlsen's games and has said that "everyting is all right with these games"
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J-dog
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 283
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Joined: 11/15/05
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #18 - 11/20/06 at 16:53:56
Post Tools
Kaspy seems to have taken a liking towards Carlsen, even doing one training session with him.  You know you're special when the greatest player of all time gives you a training session!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
player2006
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 66
Joined: 07/06/06
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #17 - 11/18/06 at 09:43:35
Post Tools
Kasparov said that "Карлсен выглядит плотнее Карякина...Он именно основательный шахматист. Плотный, основательный шахматист "
"Carlsen looks more consistent than Karjakin. He is reasonable, consistent chessplayer".
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IMJohnCox
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1551
Location: London
Joined: 01/28/06
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #16 - 11/09/06 at 14:47:47
Post Tools
Some rasping logic there from TK. You see why this man is a GM and I am not!

I keep the scoresheet over my bed, of course. You were about 210 at the time and I was about 180, so I suppose given your late start you were perhaps rather an advanced 'child', certainly chronologically speaking. In terms of experience in fact I believe you were giving me a considerable start.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3210
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #15 - 11/08/06 at 18:48:53
Post Tools
IMJohnCox wrote on 11/08/06 at 13:39:37:
I believe Tony is one of the few British GMs against whom I have a Kosten number of one, albeit achieved when he was a child.


Was I ever 'a child'? Presumably if you have a Kosten of 1, then you must have a Kasparov of at least 3 if I have a 2?! Huh
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
IMJohnCox
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1551
Location: London
Joined: 01/28/06
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #14 - 11/08/06 at 13:39:37
Post Tools
I believe Tony is one of the few British GMs against whom I have a Kosten number of one, albeit achieved when he was a child.

You wouldn't have guessed Max Euwe had a Kasparov number of 2 easily, would you? I wonder if he's the oldest player of whom that could be said - actually, without searching, I suspect Botvinnik stopped playing earlier than Euwe.

The machine claims I have four based on once beating John Nicholson but I'm sure it's actually three - I believe Murray Chandler once beat Gazza, and I must have beaten someone who's beaten him (maybe Tony, indeed, or Hebden?). Or indeed Short - lots of tough northerners beat him when he was eight or so. Not that I've beaten many tough northerners.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Antillian
God Member
*****
Offline


Brilliance without dazzle!

Posts: 1757
Joined: 01/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #13 - 11/08/06 at 11:57:46
Post Tools
Cool site. 

I get a five against Kasporov and a four against Kramnik.  Hmm....maybe it is time to turn pro  Grin
  

"Breakthrough results come about by a series of good decisions, diligently executed and accumulated one on top of another." Jim Collins --- Good to Great
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3210
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #12 - 11/07/06 at 21:35:02
Post Tools
2 links, of course, but I guess any GM who hasn't actually played Kasparov will easily get the same! I have a horrible feeling that a lot of people here will have a similar score against me! Sad
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Klick
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 528
Joined: 01/31/03
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #11 - 11/02/06 at 17:36:01
Post Tools
Funny site, seems like I'm a good chess-player after all!  Grin  I beat Kaspy in five links(same as Paul Morphy...ehmm...) and Kramnik in four!

  

There just isn't enough televised chess - DAVID LETTERMAN
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #10 - 11/02/06 at 09:28:40
Post Tools
TalJechin wrote on 11/01/06 at 18:15:30:
Willempie wrote on 11/01/06 at 17:49:22:
Alias wrote on 10/31/06 at 21:15:23:
That game against Lagrave looked impressive. They follow a line from "The Safest Sicilian" where Delchev and Semkov gives black a clear advantage after 19.Kh2 Qe7.

It didnt look that impressive to me as I dont see what white has after 21..Qc5. He can get an endgame of 2N+1B against 2R but I prefer black.

Well, 22.Nxg1 looks alright for a rapid game, e.g. 22...f6 23.Qg4 Rae8 24.Nf3 and it's not easy to penetrate with the rooks, and then if white could plant a knight on e6... Larsen once claimed that in shorther time limits a knight=rook - which leaves white a bishop up! Wink

That may be so, but black still looks better to me. He also has the option of sacking an exchange for a drawn endgame.
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #9 - 11/02/06 at 01:35:09
Post Tools
According to the database my Kaspy number is 7, but actually it is 4. In Gent 1988 I beat Edgar Blokhuis with a Danish Gambit and his number is 3. And if corr games are allowed, it is even 3: I beat Maarten Etmans once. Cheesy
So you guys might try to get a lower number as well!
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Viking
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 673
Location: Norway
Joined: 10/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #8 - 11/01/06 at 22:07:39
Post Tools
What an interesting site!  Wink


To my big surprise I am on the same level as Magnus Carlsen - with a Kasparov Number 4  Cheesy

Had no idea that any of my games was in Chess Megadata btw... Shocked)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #7 - 11/01/06 at 20:53:11
Post Tools
Quote:
No magic today.... Sad
Carlsen 0.5 - Karjakin 1.5

I guess that ukrainian boy is not that bad after all....  Wink



A completely impartial test  Roll Eyes measurng players against the strongest so far (see the link below) shows that Karjakin beats Kasparov via 2 links, while Magnus needs 4! 

(Btw, I beat Garri by 3 links myself, so I suppose the wonderboy might not be so promising after all!  Cheesy  Wink )

http://www.ibeatgarry.com/
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Viking
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 673
Location: Norway
Joined: 10/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #6 - 11/01/06 at 19:26:49
Post Tools
No magic today.... Sad
Carlsen 0.5 - Karjakin 1.5

I guess that ukrainian boy is not that bad after all....  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Carlsen or Karjakin?
Reply #5 - 11/01/06 at 18:15:30
Post Tools
Willempie wrote on 11/01/06 at 17:49:22:
Alias wrote on 10/31/06 at 21:15:23:
That game against Lagrave looked impressive. They follow a line from "The Safest Sicilian" where Delchev and Semkov gives black a clear advantage after 19.Kh2 Qe7.

It didnt look that impressive to me as I dont see what white has after 21..Qc5. He can get an endgame of 2N+1B against 2R but I prefer black.



Well, 22.Nxg1 looks alright for a rapid game, e.g. 22...f6 23.Qg4 Rae8 24.Nf3 and it's not easy to penetrate with the rooks, and then if white could plant a knight on e6... Larsen once claimed that in shorther time limits a knight=rook - which leaves white a bishop up! Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo