Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) C06: Tarrasch move order question (Read 12712 times)
easycut2007
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1
Joined: 11/28/06
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #20 - 11/28/06 at 05:22:53
Post Tools
Phoenix Studio TheWorld Browser End User License Agreement
Copyright 2004 Phoenix Studio, All Rights Reserved.

TheWorld is free for personal, home use. 

You may use this software only as described in this license.   

If you do not agree to the terms of this license, do not install or use the software.

1. SOFTWARE.  The <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">vinyl cutter</a> capitalized term "Software" used below refers to TheWorld Browser, any <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser engraver</a>updates to the software, any supplemental <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser engraving machine</a> code provided to you by Phoenix Studio, the <a href="http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=hflaser">laser engraver</a> user manual, any associated software components, any related media and printed materials, and any "online" or electronic documentation.

2. RESTRICTIONS.  You may not reduce the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com">laser cutting machine</a> Software to human readable form, reverse engineer, de-compile, or disassemble the 
<a href="http://www.hflaser.com">cutting plotter</a> Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation. You may not rent, lease, or lend the Software. You may not use the <a href="http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?contributor=hflaser">vinyl cutter</a> Software to perform any unauthorized transfer of information, such as copying or transferring  a file in violation of a copyright, or for any illegal purpose.  You may not remove any copyright, trademark, reservation of rights, or any other proprietary language displayed on, in, or with the <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">vinyl cutter</a> Software.

3.  SUPPORT SERVICES.  Phoenix Studio may provide you with <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser engraver</a> support services related to the Software. Use of support services is governed by the <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser cutting machine</a> user manual, online documentation, and other Phoenix Studio materials, as they may be modified from time to time.  Phoenix Studio may use any information you provide as part of obtaining <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">laser engraving machine</a> support services for its business purposes, including product support and development.   

4.  TERMINATION.   This license terminates if you fail to comply with its terms and conditions.   If your license terminates, you must destroy all copies of the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com/cp.html">cutting plotter</a> Software.  The termination of this license does not limit Phoenix Studio's other rights it may have by law. 

5.  COPYRIGHT.  You acknowledge that you have only the limited, non-exclusive right to use and copy the <a href="http://www.hflaser.com/cp.html">vinyl cutter</a> Software as expressly stated in this license and that Phoenix Studio retains title and all other rights. The <a href="http://easycut.blogspot.com">low cost laser engraver</a>Software is protected by  copyright law and international treaty provisions as well as other applicable laws. 

6.  NO WARRANTIES.  To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, the 
<a href="http://www.hflaser.com/le.html">laser engraver</a> Software is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including, without limitation, the implied warranties or merchantability, fitness for a particular 

The End
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #19 - 11/26/06 at 21:02:26
Post Tools
Thanks for all the replies!  I'm back from Thanksgiving and I have some things to think about.  First and foremost, I'm beginning to think that if I take up the French again, I may play 3...Be7 against the Tarrasch.  I don't particularly like how "worked-out" 3...Nf6 is these days, especially since White's best moves aren't exactly hard to find.  Not that I think that there's anything wrong with 3...Nf6, but 3...Be7 (or even 3...a6) may be a better choice for me.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #18 - 11/24/06 at 12:01:47
Post Tools
Yes - playable != fully equal of course Smiley In particular generating realistic winning chances for black in these lines once the theory gets deep isn't at all easy and the positions aren't dead draws either. At least some of the newer lines aren't worked out to this extent yet.

I guess the difference is that Nc3 tries to question the openings right to existence which the Tarrasch really doesn't do as there is always 3..c5 & exd5 if everything more interesting fails. But I'm sure I can't be the only player who's done better vs Nc3.
(Ok so this is at a level where white players aren't playing the ultra critical lines after Nc3 - they really are a little scary.).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #17 - 11/23/06 at 23:08:44
Post Tools
The Tarrasch is a very powerful system against the French and its not clear to me how he fully equalises in any branch of it. 3.Nc3 is considered stronger but is far more difficult to play in my opinion.

In those 3...Nf6 variations the most effective lines for White are those that aim consistently to trade Black's dark squared bishop, and I have yet to see a fully satisfactory counter to this plan. The line 3...c5 with 4...Qxd5 is a better equalising try, but here too his task is far from easy.

Maybe 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 a6!? or 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.Ngf3 a6!? are his best equalising tries.

Toppy Smiley
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #16 - 11/23/06 at 22:27:48
Post Tools
Matters are still not clear, at least not to me.
10...Qc7 11.Nc3 a6 12.Bg5 Bd6 13.Bh4 (13.o-o o-o 14.Bh4 Nh5 is one of the main lines) o-o (Nh5? 14.Bg3 Nxg3 15.hxg3 does not transpose, as pawn h7 is hanging) 14.Bg3 e5 15.dxe5 Nxe5 16.Nxe5 Bxe5 17.o-o Bxg3 and Black is OK, Jansa-Breutigam, Malmö Open 1986.
10...Qc7 11.Bf4 Bb4+ and is White's extra move useful after 12.Bd2 Bd6 13.o-o o-o 14.Nc3 a6 15.Re1 ? Dom's line with 12.Nd2 also looks annoying.
After 10...Bd6 11.o-o o-o 12.Bg5 Qc7 (Qe8 13.Re1 Ng4 14.h3 but Black has some other moves) 13.Rc1 White scores a very good 60%, so Black should better be prepared. What about Ng4 14.Ng3 Qb6!?

10...Bd6 11.o-o (11.Bf4) o-o (Qc7 now ?) 12.Bf4 Bxf4 13.Nxf4
a)13...Ne4 14.Ne2 Rxf3 15.gxf3 Ng5 16.Kh1 e5 17.dxe5 Nxe5 (iso Nxf3) 18.Ng1 (18.Nd4!?) Qf6 19.Be2 Bd7 20.Qxd5+ Kh8 21.Rfd1 Bc6 22.Qd6 Ne6 23.Rac1 has not done very well for Black.
b)is 13...Ng4 14.g3 g5 already refuted?
c)13...Qd6 14.g3 e5 does not look good enough.

So the old saying applies: I used to think that I was insecure, but now I don't know anymore ...
« Last Edit: 11/24/06 at 01:22:15 by MNb »  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #15 - 11/23/06 at 10:35:24
Post Tools
There is always 17 .. Ncxe5 in that line - black then goes Bd7 -> c6 sacing his d5 pawn. You have to be prepared to play an exchange down and it might be a little speculative but there is definetly some compensation.
(at least black keeps some winning chances.).

14 Qc1 seems most popular at the moment so I'd maybe worry about that more.

But if you don't like these lines don't worry too much - black does have an enormous choice of playable lines against the Tarrasch.

For instance after Nf6 there are Qb6/Qc7 ideas instead of o-o.  But you can also play c5 with Qxd5, c5 with exd5, Be7, Nc6, a6 - even h6 Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
torreattack
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 17
Joined: 11/13/06
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #14 - 11/22/06 at 15:48:34
Post Tools
Zeiger line:

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 f6 9. exf6 Nxf6 10. Nf3 Bd6 11. 0-0 0-0 12. Bf4 Bxf4 13. Nxf4 Ne4 

if 14. g3 or Qc1 then black will play Qf6 and follow by g5...

but for 14. Ne2 Rxf3 15. gxf3 Ng5 16. Kh1 e5 17. dxe5 Nxf3 18. Bxh7+ Kh8 (if i not mistaken, i only look at the DVD once...), white had too many reply here... for example, 19. Ng1 Nd4 20. Nxf3 Bg4 21. Nxd4 Bxd1...then rook take bishop and black play King take Bishop...i dislike this line, according to Zeiger, White may play for draw if he want to, and many of the position, White position was more easy to play...

i am thinking to avoid tarrash variation after looking at the DVD... Cry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #13 - 11/22/06 at 11:15:24
Post Tools
From Pedersen's book after 10 .. Bd6 11 Bf4 the idea is Qa5+ which is presumably quite similar to Qc7 Bf4 Bb4+. 

As for the choice between 10 .. Bd6 11 o-o Qc7/o-o it's not simple. Both will do well against badly prepared opposition/if both players are just making it up.

The 'problem' with 11 .. o-o is that the main line of the exchange sac (12 Bf4 BxB 13 NxB Ne4 14 Ne2 RxN etc) is very deep, pretty forcing and leads to a slightly better endgame for white. 
White also has a few other reasonable tries of course (14 Qc1 leads to another ending iirc). Once black allows Bf4 so easily he has to play actively or he's just got a bad position.

Whether this is acceptable or not is a personal choice of course - it's not really a winning try against a properly prepared opponent anymore but white might want more too. 

My impression is that 11 .. Qc7 isn't as worked out as 11 .. o-o so you might prefer that. The theory is still rather deep of course - there is a reason that people started playing 3 .. Be7 to get fighting positions Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #12 - 11/21/06 at 22:40:08
Post Tools
I haven't had time to get in-depth with the Ziegler DVD yet.  Also, I'm going out of town tonight for Thanksgiving, and won't be home until Sunday afternoon.  I'll try to get back to you next week after the Holiday and after I've had more time to look into Ziegler's analysis.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #11 - 11/21/06 at 22:28:43
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 11/21/06 at 01:07:39:
TopNotch wrote on 11/19/06 at 22:07:07:


Are you so in luv with the 11...Qc7 variation that you would risk anything to achieve it, and is such inflexibility advisablet.

Secondly is 11.Bf4 instead of 11.0-0 good for white?

In some lines it is better to meet Bg5 with Qe8 and not Qc7.

White can also try to punish black's move order tinkering with some tinkering of his own by meeting the premature 10...Qc7 with 11.Nc3 intending to meet Bd6 with Nb5 forking and trading the dark squared bishop, an occurrence which I believe you are trying to avoid at al costs.

In the above line if you avoid the fork with 11...a6 then 12.Bg5 looks akward for black to me.

Lastly didn't Tiviakov more or less bust the 11...Qc7 line?, so perhaps White should just choose to ignore Black's move order shenanigans and let him transpose to exactly what he wants.  Wink

Topertz Smiley 



So is it safe to say that after 10...Bd6 11.0-0 0-0 is now the most accurate move (and not 11...Qc7)? 



Not neccessarily the most accurate but definetley the most flexible. 

While contemplating your question I did a database search for the move order with 10...Qc7 and discovered that some strong French advocates prefer this move order. Nevertheless as a Tarrasch player myself, I would say that the effectiveness of 10....Qc7 would depend a lot on what is going on in the Bg5 lines, as I said before Qc7 is not always the best answer to Bg5.

The idea of forcing Bf4 with g3 has been around for a long time, but in some of these Tarrasch positions, g3 proves to be a minor concession for White that he would rather avoid.

My view is that Black struggles in all lines after 3...Nf6, and I really enjoy the White side here.
The strategic plan for White of trading dark squared bishops is very effective and extremely unpleasant for Black. Positionally Black is often so bankrupt in these lines that he is forced forced to rely on tactics to stay afloat.

Incidentally the plan of Bf4 is equally effective when Black Chooses 9...Qxf6 instead of 9...Nxf6 and I prefer this approach to Tiviakov's albeit successful 12.Ng3 - 15.Ne5 ideas.

What is Ziegler's take on these lines?

Regards,

Toppy Smiley          
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #10 - 11/21/06 at 01:07:39
Post Tools
TopNotch wrote on 11/19/06 at 22:07:07:


Are you so in luv with the 11...Qc7 variation that you would risk anything to achieve it, and is such inflexibility advisablet.

Secondly is 11.Bf4 instead of 11.0-0 good for white?

In some lines it is better to meet Bg5 with Qe8 and not Qc7.

White can also try to punish black's move order tinkering with some tinkering of his own by meeting the premature 10...Qc7 with 11.Nc3 intending to meet Bd6 with Nb5 forking and trading the dark squared bishop, an occurrence which I believe you are trying to avoid at al costs.

In the above line if you avoid the fork with 11...a6 then 12.Bg5 looks akward for black to me.

Lastly didn't Tiviakov more or less bust the 11...Qc7 line?, so perhaps White should just choose to ignore Black's move order shenanigans and let him transpose to exactly what he wants.  Wink

Topertz Smiley 



Thanks for the reply.

First: no, I'm not so in love with the 11...Qc7 variation that I would risk anything to achieve it; in fact, I haven't played this line in about 6 years.  I just started looking at it again, and had a move order question; I didn't see why some players played 10...Bd6 and then 11...Qc7, giving White the extra option of playing 11. Bf4.  I was under the impression that 10...Qc7 avoided 11.Bf4, due to 11...Bb4+; maybe that's not the case, however.

Secondly: is 11.Bf4 instead of 11.0-0 good for white?  I don't know for sure, but I doubt that White has anything more than a "normal" edge here.  I'm not afraid of the move 11.Bf4, I just wanted to know whether Black can by-pass it completely with 10...Qc7.

Thirdly: did Tiviakov bust the whole ...Qc7 & ...Bd6 system?  I don't know; that's part of what I was trying to get at with my post!  I'll take a look at the Tiviakov lines; perhaps these are why most players play 10...Bd6 now.

And lastly: in my investigations, I found the line 10...Qc7 11.0-0 Bd6 12.g3!?.  I hadn't seen this idea when I last played the French, so I'll have to look at it.

So is it safe to say that after 10...Bd6 11.0-0 0-0 is now the most accurate move (and not 11...Qc7)? 


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #9 - 11/20/06 at 21:31:22
Post Tools
Playable yes, inflexible also yes.

Its always dangerous to pigeon hole oneself like this.

Topertz Smiley
  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dom
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 908
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 01/11/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #8 - 11/20/06 at 19:45:25
Post Tools
Tiviakov's idea occurs only in the line (system with Qc7+Ng4+g6):  10..Qc7 11.oo Bd6 12.Bg5 oo 13.Rc1 Ng4 14.Ng3 g6 and now 15.Nd2! ... and Tiviakov himself gave some moves playable as Black, for example: 14...Bd7!? ; 13...g6 ; 13...Nh5!? , 13...Kh8

One variation is needed to decide if Qc7 is unplayable.
  

“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”  - Groucho Marx
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TopNotch
God Member
*****
Offline


I only look 1 move ahead,
but its always the best

Posts: 2211
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #7 - 11/19/06 at 22:07:07
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 11/18/06 at 02:34:16:
I know the basic theory and plans of these lines; for instance, I have Ziegler's DVD and a couple of books on the French Defence, as well as NCO, Chessbase 8, etc.  I also know something of the nuances of playing 12. Bg5 v.s. 12. Nc3 a6 13. Bg5.  What I'm asking is this:

Ziegler recommends 10...Bd6, and most players play this move.  However, Ziegler (and most others) end up playing 10...Bd6 11.0-0 Qc7.  Now, since we're heading for this position anyway, is there any reason why I should allow White to play 10...Bd6 11.Bf4?  Is it really that great for Black to allow White this extra choice?  Is there a reason to NOT recommend 10...Qc7, which seems to head for the same position (after 11.0-0 Bd6) without allowing 10...Bd6 11.Bf4?  Is there anything wrong with 10...Qc7???

Okay I hope that clears up my question...


Are you so in luv with the 11...Qc7 variation that you would risk anything to achieve it, and is such inflexibility advisablet.

Secondly is 11.Bf4 instead of 11.0-0 good for white?

In some lines it is better to meet Bg5 with Qe8 and not Qc7.

White can also try to punish black's move order tinkering with some tinkering of his own by meeting the premature 10...Qc7 with 11.Nc3 intending to meet Bd6 with Nb5 forking and trading the dark squared bishop, an occurrence which I believe you are trying to avoid at al costs.

In the above line if you avoid the fork with 11...a6 then 12.Bg5 looks akward for black to me.

Lastly didn't Tiviakov more or less bust the 11...Qc7 line?, so perhaps White should just choose to ignore Black's move order shenanigans and let him transpose to exactly what he wants.  Wink

Topertz Smiley  




« Last Edit: 11/20/06 at 21:28:32 by TopNotch »  

The man who tries to do something and fails is infinitely better than he who tries to do nothing and succeeds - Lloyd Jones Smiley
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dom
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 908
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 01/11/03
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch move order question
Reply #6 - 11/19/06 at 19:38:02
Post Tools
I played the variation as Black 2 hours ago (rapid Ste Foix Aigrefeuille)... and in fact, not so clear despite Psakhis opinion:
10....Qc7 11.Bf4 Bb4+ 12.Nd2!? Bd6 13.Bxd6 Qxd6 14.oo oo 15.Nf3 Ng4 16.Ng3 e5 17.dxe5 Ngxe5 18.Nxe5 Nxe5 (Psakhis gave good position for Black because of knight position on g3 square) and now19.Bc2!? Bg4?! 20.Qd4! +=   Cry

Maybe better: 10...Bd6 11.Bf4 Bb4!? or 11....Qa5+ 12.Qd2 Bb4 13.Nc3 oo 14.oo Ne4 15.Bxe4 dxe4 16.Ng5 Nxd4 17.Qxd4 Rxf4 (Psakhis)
  

“Learn from the mistakes of others. You can never live long enough to make them all yourself.”  - Groucho Marx
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo