Normal Topic An unknown line in Evans Gambit (Read 3698 times)
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: An unknown line in Evans Gambit
Reply #4 - 01/08/07 at 20:09:14
Post Tools
Don't know - I don't have Pinski!
I don't agree with you on the Ingo Schwartz files - the data are often wrong or incomplete. But it is true, there are quite a few old games (pre 1950) which are not in Chessbase. So history buffs should have it.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
photophore
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 203
Location: Montesson
Joined: 09/25/04
Gender: Male
Re: An unknown line in Evans Gambit
Reply #3 - 01/08/07 at 15:54:39
Post Tools
Thanks to you both !
At end , I could find this line in the DB of Ingo Schwatz : 2 games , both drawn , as I could win mine
you can download this DB at icofy.com : it's very big ( 3 million games in 5 files corresponding to ECO ) and very good
Friendly Yours
Claude Le Page
PS I have not Palkovi on Evans Gambit : Isit better than Pinski ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: An unknown line in Evans Gambit
Reply #2 - 01/07/07 at 20:09:52
Post Tools
Palkovi prefers 8...Ne5 9.Nxf7 Nxf7 10.Bxf7+ Kxf7 11.Qh5+ and 8...d5 9.exd5 Ne5 10.Qd4. According to his analysis - which I have not checked - White gets a nice initiative.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
micawber
God Member
*****
Offline


like many sneaks and skunks
in history he's a poet

Posts: 852
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 09/07/05
Gender: Male
Re: An unknown line in Evans Gambit
Reply #1 - 01/07/07 at 13:52:48
Post Tools
I agree with you about Rd1 being stronger than either Ba3 or Ne4.
However I also have a question. To me it appears that black's safest course is:

10.Bb3,0-0 (instead of 10.dxc)
and now

11.Nxh7, Kxh7 12.Qh5,Kg8 13.Qxe5,Nf5 14.Bd2 (Short-Adams, Sarajevo 2000) when I think
14....Re8 is at least as strong as Adam's 14...c5.

or

11.cxd4, (first played in Andersen-Mieses, Breslau 1867)
when black can choose between 
11...... Ng4 !? (a bit risky) 12.Ba3, Nxd5 !? 13.Bxf8, Qxg5 14.Bxd5,Qxd5 with sufficient compensation (Anderssen-Mieses)
or
11......N5g6 (safer) 12.h4,h6 (VandenDriesse-Froeyman, Belgium, 2003).

Any novelties in these lines ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
photophore
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 203
Location: Montesson
Joined: 09/25/04
Gender: Male
An unknown line in Evans Gambit
01/03/07 at 17:55:56
Post Tools
I just played this game in AJEC accession Tournament :
White : Claude Le Page
Black : Jean-Pierre Merot
Result : 1-0 (55) 
1 e4 e5
2 Nf3 Nc6
3 Bc4 Bc5
4 b4 Bxb4
5 c3 Ba5
6 d4 exd4
7 O-O Nge7 ( Panov's line )
8 Ng5 d5
9 exd5 Ne5
10 Bb3 dxc3
11 Qe2 f6  Here Pinski gives only 12 Ne4 and 12 Ba3 , without conclusive results
The move I played is not quite new ( I have 2 games in my DB , but it's seldom played , I ignore why ) 
12 Rd1 Bg4
13 f3 Bf5
14 Ne6 Qd6
15 Nxg7+ Kd8
What do you think about this line , that looks better for White than either 12 Ne4  ,  or 12 Ba3   ?
Happy New Year!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo