Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Falkbeer 3...exf4! (Read 14902 times)
Jonathan Tait
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 616
Location: Nottingham
Joined: 07/11/06
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #20 - 02/13/07 at 20:56:57
Post Tools
Alesab wrote on 02/12/07 at 13:36:12:
2...exf4 move order is imo less precise, because White could play 3. Ac4! avoiding d5.


Black can still play 3...d5 there, no problem
  

blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #19 - 02/13/07 at 20:36:26
Post Tools
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #18 - 02/13/07 at 13:22:16
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 02/13/07 at 13:14:05:
TalJechin wrote on 02/13/07 at 13:01:05:
Look around the forum, we've discussed 3...Nc6 several times since the FKG came out in January 2005. At the moment, I don't find much to comment on as it's extremely rare as far as I know.
- I can only find one game since 2005...



I don't think Alesab will find anything.  I looked and couldn't. 



Did you forget to choose "all posts" in the drop down field?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #17 - 02/13/07 at 13:14:05
Post Tools
TalJechin wrote on 02/13/07 at 13:01:05:
Look around the forum, we've discussed 3...Nc6 several times since the FKG came out in January 2005. At the moment, I don't find much to comment on as it's extremely rare as far as I know.
- I can only find one game since 2005...



I don't think Alesab will find anything.  I looked and couldn't. 
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #16 - 02/13/07 at 13:01:05
Post Tools
Look around the forum, we've discussed 3...Nc6 several times since the FKG came out in January 2005. At the moment, I don't find much to comment on as it's extremely rare as far as I know.
- I can only find one game since 2005...


Btw, from the latest TWIC, here's something for Oliver to look at, white gives three pieces to mate!  Smiley

Papp,G (2335) - Pilgaard,K (2412) [C37]
FSGM February Budapest HUN (3), 05.02.2007

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.d4 Bg7 5.Nc3 d6 6.g3 g4 7.Nh4 f3 8.Be3 c6 9.Qd2 Qa5 10.0-0-0 Ne7 11.Bh6 Rg8 12.Kb1 Bh8 13.Qf4 b5 14.Nf5 Rg6 15.Nxd6+ Rxd6 16.Qxd6 b4 17.Na4 Qxa4 18.Bg5 f6 19.h3 fxg5 20.hxg4 Bg7 21.Rxh7 Bf8 22.Bc4 Nd7 23.Bf7+ Kd8 24.Rh8 Qxc2+ 25.Kxc2 b3+ 26.Kb1 bxa2+ 27.Ka1 1-0
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Alesab
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 36
Location: Rome, Italy
Joined: 11/17/06
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #15 - 02/13/07 at 11:55:28
Post Tools
Thanks to all for ideas and links
It looks that after 3...exf4 White can exploit the particular move order avoiding 4. Nf3 Nf6
and playing 4. Bb5+!? or 4. Bc4 delaying for Nf3...

I'm not no more worrying about Modern Variation but now i've another problem...

After 2...exf4 3. Bc4 Nc6! how can i continue??

- 4. Nf3 g5 is a terribly theoretical line ok the King's Knight gambit (and now not 5. h4 g4 6. Cg5 Ce5! but 5. d4 Ag7!)
- 4. d4 Nf6! White has some problem

Do you know a sure line for white, without ugly sacrifices and big theory???
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #14 - 02/13/07 at 01:31:47
Post Tools
[quote author=Willempie link=1171277123/0#9 date=1171290125][quote author=Markovich link=1171277123/0#5 date=1171288170]Actually if followed up with 4. Nf3 Nf6, this simply transposes into the "Modern Defense," about which there is a very substantial theory.  Since this is one of the best defenses to the Knight's Gambit, it is a little frustrating for a player of the Bishop's Gambit to have to play into it. Fortunately however, White has the option of 4. Bb5+ instead of 4. Nf3. Then 4...c6  5. dxc6 Nxc6  6. d4 is quite different and, I suspect, a little better for White than it is with both king's knights out.
  [/quote]
Disagree here:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6 4.dxc6 Nxc6 5.Bb5 exf4 6.d4 and now 6..Qa5+ 7.Nc3 Bb4 and to me black looks much better.[/quote]

Well, it seems we do disagree since after 7...Bb4, I think 8. Bxc6+ bxc6  9. Qf3 Ne7  10. Ne2 is promising for White.  Yeah, and I did sort of recall discussing this before.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #13 - 02/12/07 at 15:42:15
Post Tools
The lord of the links strikes again Wink
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #12 - 02/12/07 at 15:07:45
Post Tools
[quote author=Markovich link=1171277123/0#10 date=1171291594][quote author=Willempie link=1171277123/0#9 date=1171290125][quote author=Markovich link=1171277123/0#5 date=1171288170]Actually if followed up with 4. Nf3 Nf6, this simply transposes into the "Modern Defense," about which there is a very substantial theory.  Since this is one of the best defenses to the Knight's Gambit, it is a little frustrating for a player of the Bishop's Gambit to have to play into it. Fortunately however, White has the option of 4. Bb5+ instead of 4. Nf3. Then 4...c6  5. dxc6 Nxc6  6. d4 is quite different and, I suspect, a little better for White than it is with both king's knights out.
  [/quote]
Disagree here:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6 4.dxc6 Nxc6 5.Bb5 exf4 6.d4 and now 6..Qa5+ 7.Nc3 Bb4 and to me black looks much better.[/quote]

Hmm.  Maybe I'm wrong about 4. Bb5+.  I thought I recalled looking at this and thinking it was pretty good for White.  I'll look at this some more and come back.[/quote]


We've discussed it already: [url]http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1080450197/18#18[/url]
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #11 - 02/12/07 at 14:58:22
Post Tools
[quote author=Alesab link=1171277123/0#0 date=1171277120]i'd like to play king's gambit as white and now i'm studying it...

i've completed a good repertoire agianst every black's plan, based on 2...exf4 3. Ac4
2...Ac5?! doesn't look dangerous and i dont worry about 2...d5!? 3. exd5 e4 or 3...c6

My problem is 2...d5 3. exd5 exf4! and now i dont know a good line for white...
i know its not a very populare line , but i'd like to know almost a playble line for white.
i would be happy to obtain only equality in this line but i dont' know anything good enaugh.

DO YOU KNOW A LINE AT LEAST EQUAL FOR WHITE AGAINST FALKBER WITH 3...exf4 ?

Thanks, Alesab[/quote]


After 1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Nf3 Nf6 either play 5.Bc4 Nxd5 6.Bxd5 Qxd5 7.Nc3 which has gathered some theory to digest or try the less common 5.Be2!? which is easier to play 'with your hands'.


For the record, nowadays this would be called the Modern defence, while the Falkbeer begins after 3...e4 and Nimzowitsch's counter gambit is 3...c6. But those weren't known back when Falkbeer invented his gambit.
« Last Edit: 02/12/07 at 16:27:13 by TalJechin »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #10 - 02/12/07 at 14:46:34
Post Tools
[quote author=Willempie link=1171277123/0#9 date=1171290125][quote author=Markovich link=1171277123/0#5 date=1171288170]Actually if followed up with 4. Nf3 Nf6, this simply transposes into the "Modern Defense," about which there is a very substantial theory.  Since this is one of the best defenses to the Knight's Gambit, it is a little frustrating for a player of the Bishop's Gambit to have to play into it. Fortunately however, White has the option of 4. Bb5+ instead of 4. Nf3. Then 4...c6  5. dxc6 Nxc6  6. d4 is quite different and, I suspect, a little better for White than it is with both king's knights out.
  [/quote]
Disagree here:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6 4.dxc6 Nxc6 5.Bb5 exf4 6.d4 and now 6..Qa5+ 7.Nc3 Bb4 and to me black looks much better.[/quote]

Hmm.  Maybe I'm wrong about 4. Bb5+.  I thought I recalled looking at this and thinking it was pretty good for White.  I'll look at this some more and come back.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #9 - 02/12/07 at 14:22:05
Post Tools
[quote author=Markovich link=1171277123/0#5 date=1171288170]Actually if followed up with 4. Nf3 Nf6, this simply transposes into the "Modern Defense," about which there is a very substantial theory.  Since this is one of the best defenses to the Knight's Gambit, it is a little frustrating for a player of the Bishop's Gambit to have to play into it. Fortunately however, White has the option of 4. Bb5+ instead of 4. Nf3. Then 4...c6  5. dxc6 Nxc6  6. d4 is quite different and, I suspect, a little better for White than it is with both king's knights out.
 [/quote]
Disagree here:
1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 c6 4.dxc6 Nxc6 5.Bb5 exf4 6.d4 and now 6..Qa5+ 7.Nc3 Bb4 and to me black looks much better.
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tafl
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: Norway
Joined: 05/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #8 - 02/12/07 at 14:10:49
Post Tools
Yes, Marcovich, our posts crossed.

I hope I understand your last post correctly, because I still believe my points are essentially correct.
It is possible that point 3) about 4.Bc4 analytically is fairly unimportant compared to your 4.Bb5+, but ChessBase 2006 statistics to some extents supports 4.Bc4:
- It has been played more frequently (40 games compared to 20)
- It has better practical results (50% vs. 35%)
- It has been played by stronger players (Adams, Shirov, J.Polgar vs. a couple of 2100+ players).

This of course proves little in analytical terms, but is quite important from a practical viewpoint. I apologize if I have missed some transpositional trick and would appreciate being corrected.
  

A computer once beat me at chess but it was no match for me at kick boxing - Emo Philips
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #7 - 02/12/07 at 13:57:49
Post Tools
tafl wrote on 02/12/07 at 13:50:45:
I am no King's Gambit expert, but I think this sums up the essential points:
1) As Willempie points out, the position after 2...d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Nf3 more frequently arises after 2...exf4 3.Nf3 d5 4.exd5.
2) The Falkbeer move-order (2...d5) to some extent eliminates the Bishop gambit 2...exf4 3.Bc4!?
3) This is to some extent compensated by White's extra option pointed out by Alesab 2...d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Bc4 which could also arise after 2...exf4 3.Bc4 d5 4.exd5. But it's worth noting that with this move-order White generally prefers 4.Bxd5.



I assume our posts crossed and that you didn't see mine.  But I disagree with your understanding here for the reasons I pointed out. 

Also the pawn on d5 and the bishop on c4 is quite ugly.  It seems a terrible waste of the first move to play into such a position.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tafl
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: Norway
Joined: 05/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: Falkbeer 3...exf4!
Reply #6 - 02/12/07 at 13:50:45
Post Tools
I am no King's Gambit expert, but I think this sums up the essential points:
1) As Willempie points out, the position after 2...d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Nf3 more frequently arises after 2...exf4 3.Nf3 d5 4.exd5.
2) The Falkbeer move-order (2...d5) to some extent eliminates the Bishop gambit 2...exf4 3.Bc4!?
3) This is to some extent compensated by White's extra option pointed out by Alesab 2...d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Bc4 which could also arise after 2...exf4 3.Bc4 d5 4.exd5. But it's worth noting that with this move-order White generally prefers 4.Bxd5.

  

A computer once beat me at chess but it was no match for me at kick boxing - Emo Philips
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo