Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) KG convert (Read 35239 times)
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: KG convert
Reply #8 - 02/27/07 at 17:14:36
Post Tools
Dragonslayer wrote on 02/27/07 at 15:48:34:
I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect opening. But for me it is the perfect opening.



Everyone is in love with his own systems.  Lately I have this obsessive relationship with Alekhine's.  I have no doubt that 2. f4 is positionally well-founded and probably doesn't lose.  It's just that White weakens the kingside dark squares so much that this tends to negate his advantages.  I think, at least with 3. Bc4, it's a good system for club level play.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dragonslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 248
Location: Odense
Joined: 06/13/04
Re: KG convert
Reply #7 - 02/27/07 at 15:48:34
Post Tools
I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect opening. But for me it is the perfect opening.

Suggesting a book is difficult. If you want to play the Bishop's gambit then get Johansson's book. If you prefer 3.Nf3 there really aren't any books that are both good and up to date.
This Forum is a good place to begin your studies. What you need to know first is:
- what to do against the patzer defences e.g. 2...exf4, 3...d6 4...Nf6/4...Bg4.
- How to use the f-file.
- How to avoid Black defending pawn-f4 (e.g. in the classical) and prevent the opening of the f-file.
- Avoid a few traps. I.e. don't play fxe5 early on.
- What to do if Black checks with the bishop on h4.
- What to do in the centre. Allowing Black to block with d7-d5 is a concession and should normally be prevented by exd5 (or exd6 e.p.)
- and the concepts get more sophisticated as you progress. E.g. When is e4-e5 good? Which endgames are good? When is d4-d5-d6 good. Should White break on the kingside with g2-g3 or h2-h4?

After that you can find a line against each Black defence. Not necessarily the best one, but one you feel comfortable with. Play some blitz games with different variations to decide, which one warrants further study.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JonHecht
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/17/07
Re: KG convert
Reply #6 - 02/27/07 at 01:22:10
Post Tools
Smiley You make it sound like the perfect opening, so what material should I read to learn to play it?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dragonslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 248
Location: Odense
Joined: 06/13/04
Re: KG convert
Reply #5 - 02/27/07 at 00:02:16
Post Tools
JonHecht wrote on 02/24/07 at 23:52:41:
I used to play Queen's gambit, getting tired of it and wanted to switch to an aggressive e4 repertoire not that I played d4 for a year, and dabbled in Nf3. Maybe Italian game?


If you are 1800 don't worry about it! Fedorov got to 2680 before he had quit the KG.

I have an Elo of 2130 and have only lost two games in the last 5 years with the KG. One where I blundered in a completely winning position and the other against IM Kim Pilgaard, where I also had a big advantage (Pilgaard switched variations after that game!).
Most people don't dare play 1...e5 against me, even if they have never played anything else their whole life. One club-mate (Elo 2150) who does play 1...e5 has twice come to the game prepared to his teeth with a secret variations against the KG, while I had no idea what he was going to play beyond 2.f4. He got two draws and was very pleased.
Even the scary 2...exf4 3.Nf3 g5 lines are ok to play because most people don't know what to do and if they do they will get a draw at most.
In my experience people are so scared of the KG that they will play something else. So play the KG if you really like the Caro-Kann  Wink

Play the KG - you will not be disappointed.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tragonchino
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2
Joined: 02/03/07
Re: KG convert
Reply #4 - 02/26/07 at 22:03:07
Post Tools
I suppose that these kind of openings are bad are unveliable, they aren´t agressive, they are just bad. I recomend you to study the evans, or the Spanish, and just play agressive and good chess.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JonHecht
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/17/07
Re: KG convert
Reply #3 - 02/24/07 at 23:52:41
Post Tools
I used to play Queen's gambit, getting tired of it and wanted to switch to an aggressive e4 repertoire not that I played d4 for a year, and dabbled in Nf3. Maybe Italian game?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10777
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: KG convert
Reply #2 - 02/24/07 at 20:49:34
Post Tools
JonHecht wrote on 02/24/07 at 06:48:17:
Decided I am gonna play 1. e4 and don't feel like learning both Petrov and Ruy, and the reason I am playing e4 is to try to be more aggressive... therefore I am going to play King's Gambit. I am 1700 USCF and 1800 strength, though much stronger at attacking (which is why I am playing more aggressive openings). So... any repertoire recommendations?


The KG is quite positional these days. After eg 1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd4 exf4 4.Nf3 White very often strives not for an attack, but for an advantegeous endgame. It is more or less the same with 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 c6.

So you might consider forming a repertoire around 1.d4 d5 2.c4. If Black plays ...dxc4, White can answer e2-e4, allow b7-b5 and continue in KG-spirit. If Black declines, there are also a few aggressive options for White. It is more difficult after 1...Nf6 to play attacking chess, but certain not impossible.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: KG convert
Reply #1 - 02/24/07 at 17:17:18
Post Tools
JonHecht wrote on 02/24/07 at 06:48:17:
Decided I am gonna play 1. e4 and don't feel like learning both Petrov and Ruy, and the reason I am playing e4 is to try to be more aggressive... therefore I am going to play King's Gambit. I am 1700 USCF and 1800 strength, though much stronger at attacking (which is why I am playing more aggressive openings). So... any repertoire recommendations?


Yes, after 2...exf4, play 3. Bc4.  A couple of King's Gambit verities are, (1) when checked early along the e-file, Kf2 is often good and (2) with pawns on d4 and e4, the queen very often belongs on d3.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JonHecht
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/17/07
KG convert
02/24/07 at 06:48:17
Post Tools
Decided I am gonna play 1. e4 and don't feel like learning both Petrov and Ruy, and the reason I am playing e4 is to try to be more aggressive... therefore I am going to play King's Gambit. I am 1700 USCF and 1800 strength, though much stronger at attacking (which is why I am playing more aggressive openings). So... any repertoire recommendations?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo