5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Bb5ch c6 10.gxf3
@Meat, you may understand my point later, we will speak about it, for the moment, we will just look at sloughter's refutations because it's for the first interest of the whole theory of the 2Knights defense, because now it seems in great danger.
8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6 13.@sloughter, warning, long variation= wrong variation. I think it's from Tartakower, and it's still right when the variation isn't any forced.
Now let's look to your refutations here:
Quote:5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8
8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2
Now my response, 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8, nice, you reached the test 2 with success, congratulation. Now I play:
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3. Let's continue the refutation, I want to learn everything I can from you.
Now the more serious line for Black.
"8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7
11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2", long variation, wrong variation, isn't it? First, 11.Nec3 looks really strange for someone who speak about "knight tango", tempo and development. 11.Nbc3, more natural, looks stronger too. Now let's look at Black's improvments, 11..0-0 a natural move and probably a good move, but ok, 11..Nf4 still looks ok. 12.d3 and no, I won't take that bishop e2, that's not very good, my "tango knight" has something better to do, I play 12..Ne6 aiming for the d4-square. Now I want to castle and to put my knight on d4 and continue my development/attack, and I wait your improvments.
So, let's continue "just for fun" both:
Game1: 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3
Game2: 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6!