Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6? (Read 219351 times)
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #131 - 02/05/09 at 12:08:28
Post Tools
Sloughter knows that the 2Knights is refuted, and he knows that God exists, but he can't prove anything, but still, he knows Smiley

I will stop spending my time to reply to his 80%wrong analysis by now, my lesson is finished, I don't know if it helped him to learn something.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #130 - 02/05/09 at 11:58:49
Post Tools
Sure we're doing analysis and it is no shame to go back at will.
But given that your analysis has not hold up until now, your bold claims at refutation are annoying.

The bolder the claim, the more justified it has to be.
If I said I found a counterexample to the laws of gravity, my proof had better be solid.
Otherwise you would say I just want some publicity.

I'd be happy to test your 9.Bc6:+ (just next week), but give up on the "I know White is winning".
It is not worth anything until you have gained some respect for your analytical skills.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #129 - 02/05/09 at 11:20:49
Post Tools
Dear Uruk,

You seem to feel in analysis, if one line is a bust, that this refutes the opening. I know White is winning here, so it is just a question of stringing together the right concepts I had a lapse in pattern recognition at the start of the sequence, which was a huge mistake i.e. thinking that there was not a substantial difference between the 8...Rb8 lines and the 8...Be7 lines. The differences are huge. White should just grab the second pawn with a clearly better position. If you wish to believe that we are playing a "game" please let me know because I was under the impression that this was a discussion of theory.

If you really want to play an analysis game let's now call this a "game" so I know we are on the same page.

8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bxc6ch! Your move.Uruk wrote on 02/05/09 at 03:39:04:
Summing up:
- you claimed an edge with 9.Be2, there was none;
- you claimed an edge with 9.Bd3, there was none;
- now you want to try 9.Bf1...

Give me a break. The line you give is cooperative, Black won't play these aimless Queen moves.

Not that you proved anything against Arkhein either.
Sorry, your "refutation of the Two Knights" is really hot air.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #128 - 02/05/09 at 03:39:04
Post Tools
Summing up:
- you claimed an edge with 9.Be2, there was none;
- you claimed an edge with 9.Bd3, there was none;
- now you want to try 9.Bf1...

Give me a break. The line you give is cooperative, Black won't play these aimless Queen moves.

Not that you proved anything against Arkhein either.
Sorry, your "refutation of the Two Knights" is really hot air.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #127 - 02/05/09 at 02:36:57
Post Tools
8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bf1!? (A Berliner Idea) O-O 10.d3 Ng4 11.Nh3 Qd4 12.c3 Qd5 13.Nd2 Rd8 14.Be2 Nb7 15.O-O Nc5 16.Ne4 Nxd3?! 17.Bg5! +/=Uruk wrote on 02/04/09 at 23:21:07:
In the variation 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 0-0, you suggest 10.Nc3, which is fine. Now ...g6 is risky because of h4.

So I play 10...h6 11.Nge4 Nd5, which is similar to your game with ArkheiN, but the Bishop is a more serious test on d3.

After 12.Ng3 Nb4 13.Nf5 Bg5 (idea g6) 14.h4 Nd3: 15.cd3: Be7, can you prove an advantage ?

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #126 - 02/04/09 at 23:21:07
Post Tools
In the variation 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 0-0, you suggest 10.Nc3, which is fine. Now ...g6 is risky because of h4.

So I play 10...h6 11.Nge4 Nd5, which is similar to your game with ArkheiN, but the Bishop is a more serious test on d3.

After 12.Ng3 Nb4 13.Nf5 Bg5 (idea g6) 14.h4 Nd3: 15.cd3: Be7, can you prove an advantage ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #125 - 02/04/09 at 22:50:03
Post Tools
@Meat and spectators of "game 1", you can see my point now. I played a dubious line (5..Bg4?! 6..Qc8?!) and I knew it, but I strongly felt that sloughter would fall into the big anti-computer trap ( 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Fb5+ c6 10.gxf3 Qh3 which is in fact strong for Black despite computer say for a long time, and there sloughter "resigned" and then want to take back again), and that worked. Your suggestion of 8.fxg4, more human, is also stronger, and stronger than is last mentionned move, 8.Nxe5.

@sloughter, "game 1" is finished now, I saw what I wanted to see, you and your computed falled into the only real trap (8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Fb5+ c6 10.gxf3 etc). Even simple human move as 6.f3 followed by 7.Qe2 is strong to White without letting any complication to Black. I hope you learned something from that little lesson. Now Iam waiting the refutation of the "game 2", where I believe you won't because this time I chose a serious defense.
Chess is not always easy, you can't refute in one hour what has been played for 100 years, even with fritz 8. I hope you begin to understand something new now.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #124 - 02/04/09 at 16:35:06
Post Tools
Let's say I stepped into a small trap without thinking i.e. that anything wins. It's trickier than it looks, but just 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxe5 takes the wind out of Black's sails.ArKheiN wrote on 02/04/09 at 15:15:55:
Game 1: 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Fb5+ c6 10.gxf3 Qh3 let's continue.

Sloughter, why do you always want to play bad moves for Black? After 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6! 13.Qg3, Why would I play that bad move 13..Bg5 when I say I would play something like castle or Nd4?

So: 

Game 2: 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6! 13.Qg3 Nd4 and my next move will be 14..0-0 after most of your moves.

13.Qg3 Nd4 14.Bd1 O-O 15.h3 Bh4 16.Qh2 Re8 17.O-O Bg5 18.Nd2 Bf4 19.g3 Bg5 20.Nce4 Be7 21.g4 Qd5 22.Nf3 f5 23.gxf5 Bxf5 24.Re1


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #123 - 02/04/09 at 15:15:55
Post Tools
Game 1: 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Fb5+ c6 10.gxf3 Qh3 let's continue.

Sloughter, why do you always want to play bad moves for Black? After 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6! 13.Qg3, Why would I play that bad move 13..Bg5 when I say I would play something like castle or Nd4?

So: 

Game 2: 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6! 13.Qg3 Nd4 and my next move will be 14..0-0 after most of your moves.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #122 - 02/04/09 at 12:58:20
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 02/04/09 at 12:40:29:
sloughter wrote on 02/04/09 at 10:57:37:
White must improve earlier. 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 Bg4 10.Qe3 Nd7 11.Nf3 Bc5 12.Qg5 Bxf3 13.Qxd8ch Rxd8 14.gxf3 g6 15.Be2 f5 16.d3


Ok, 9.Bd3 should be better than Be2. But what a strange line do you offer... don't you know I want to castle ?

9.Bd3 0-0, and if you also castle, I propose ...g6, which could serve a later ...f5.
10.Nc3 Qd4 11.Be2 Bg4 12.Qe3 Nb7 13.d3 Bb4 14.Bd2 Rae8 15.Bxg4 Qxg4 16.Qg3 e4 17.Ncxe4 Bxd2ch 18.Kxd2
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #121 - 02/04/09 at 12:40:29
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 02/04/09 at 10:57:37:
White must improve earlier. 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 Bg4 10.Qe3 Nd7 11.Nf3 Bc5 12.Qg5 Bxf3 13.Qxd8ch Rxd8 14.gxf3 g6 15.Be2 f5 16.d3


Ok, 9.Bd3 should be better than Be2. But what a strange line do you offer... don't you know I want to castle ?

9.Bd3 0-0, and if you also castle, I propose ...g6, which could serve a later ...f5.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #120 - 02/04/09 at 12:39:09
Post Tools
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3 9.Bb5ch c6 10.gxf3

ArKheiN wrote on 02/04/09 at 11:29:11:
@Meat, you may understand my point later, we will speak about it, for the moment, we will just look at sloughter's refutations because it's for the first interest of the whole theory of the 2Knights defense, because now it seems in great danger.

8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6 13.@sloughter, warning, long variation= wrong variation. I think it's from Tartakower, and it's still right when the variation isn't any forced.
Now let's look to your refutations here: Quote:
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8

8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2


Now my response, 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8, nice, you reached the test 2 with success, congratulation. Now I play:
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3. Let's continue the refutation, I want to learn everything I can from you.

Now the more serious line for Black.
"8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2", long variation, wrong variation, isn't it? First, 11.Nec3 looks really strange for someone who speak about "knight tango", tempo and development. 11.Nbc3, more natural, looks stronger too. Now let's look at Black's improvments, 11..0-0 a natural move and probably a good move, but ok, 11..Nf4 still looks ok. 12.d3 and no, I won't take that bishop e2, that's not very good, my "tango knight" has something better to do, I play 12..Ne6 aiming for the d4-square. Now I want to castle and to put my knight on d4 and continue my development/attack, and I wait your improvments.

So, let's continue "just for fun" both:

Game1: 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3

Game2: 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6!
13.Qg3 Bg5 14.Bxg5 Qxg5 15.Nd2 Nd4 16.O-O-O Be6 17.Rde1
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #119 - 02/04/09 at 11:29:11
Post Tools
@Meat, you may understand my point later, we will speak about it, for the moment, we will just look at sloughter's refutations because it's for the first interest of the whole theory of the 2Knights defense, because now it seems in great danger.

@sloughter, warning, long variation= wrong variation. I think it's from Tartakower, and it's still right when the variation isn't any forced.
Now let's look to your refutations here: Quote:
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8

8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2


Now my response, 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8, nice, you reached the test 2 with success, congratulation. Now I play:
5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3. Let's continue the refutation, I want to learn everything I can from you.

Now the more serious line for Black.
"8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Nxe2 13.Nxe2 O-O 14.O-O Qd6 15.b3 Re8 16.Bb2", long variation, wrong variation, isn't it? First, 11.Nec3 looks really strange for someone who speak about "knight tango", tempo and development. 11.Nbc3, more natural, looks stronger too. Now let's look at Black's improvments, 11..0-0 a natural move and probably a good move, but ok, 11..Nf4 still looks ok. 12.d3 and no, I won't take that bishop e2, that's not very good, my "tango knight" has something better to do, I play 12..Ne6 aiming for the d4-square. Now I want to castle and to put my knight on d4 and continue my development/attack, and I wait your improvments.

So, let's continue "just for fun" both:

Game1: 5.exd5 Bg4 6.Nxf7 Qc8 7.f3 Nd4 8.Nxh8 Bxf3

Game2: 8.Qf3 h6 9.Ne4 Nd5 10.Be2 Be7 11.Nec3 Nf4 12.d3 Ne6!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #118 - 02/04/09 at 10:57:37
Post Tools
White must improve earlier. 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 Bg4 10.Qe3 Nd7 11.Nf3 Bc5 12.Qg5 Bxf3 13.Qxd8ch Rxd8 14.gxf3 g6 15.Be2 f5 16.d3 Uruk wrote on 02/04/09 at 07:17:21:
Phew, this line is too long! No surprise there is an early improvement.

16...Bg5! instead of Bf6.
Giving a piece, but asking if you also like your King in the middle!

17.Bg5: Qg5: 18.Qa5: Qg2: 19.Rf1 Rbe8 20.Nd5: Re2:+! 21.Ke2: Bg4+
and White is probably fried chicken.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: refutation of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6?
Reply #117 - 02/04/09 at 07:17:21
Post Tools
Phew, this line is too long! No surprise there is an early improvement.

16...Bg5! instead of Bf6.
Giving a piece, but asking if you also like your King in the middle!

17.Bg5: Qg5: 18.Qa5: Qg2: 19.Rf1 Rbe8 20.Nd5: Re2:+! 21.Ke2: Bg4+
and White is probably fried chicken.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo