Markovich wrote on 02/24/09 at 19:23:42:



No it does not.  

It is not about free expressions.  Making threats is not protected speech, nor is advocating the death of other people.



British and US laws are very clear about this. 


Nazi's and pedophiles should never be welcome anywhere as they have but one shared goal, and that is to satisfy their abnormal lust.


And please, I do not need respect from anyone, am not looking for it, and refuse it from someone that would tolerate a Nazi for any reason.


That is what The Roman Catholic Church did when they helped these people escape to S America and I had hoped you were not that type of person.

I am sorry to see I was wrong and remain optimistic that you talk to someone that puts some common sense back into you because I like what your offer in chess, but now will not even be able to enjoy that aspect of you.

Let me be clear:  I have no respect at all for your position.

You?  Yes, a little, but only because I hope you come to your senses as your powerful and skillful rhetoric could help solve problems instead of allowing them to live on and be empowered by your inactivity and unwillingness to do what is right.

You have convinced me I need not be here, there is no reason to spend any more $$ here and I will likewise try to influence others to do likewise.

If that makes me a slave and a tyrant, I can sleep well tonight and each ensuing evening with that new definition attached to me knowing from whence it came.

I am sure I will not be missed and I equally sure I will not miss anything really significant to me.

Good luck with your own latent hatreds.

Sincerely,

~ drkodos

drkodos wrote on 02/24/09 at 19:15:22:


I have the greatest respect for you, but I hope you will pardon me, because this goes to liberty and free expression.  If you ban someone's presence or rights of expression based only on your detestation of his views, you become a tyrant to him and a slave to your presently held opinions.

Also I don't want to belittle what you said, but sloughter hasn't brutally murdered anyone, so far as I know.

This is my last post to this thread, which has become an arena for hysteria and insanity.

Roger Williamson wrote on 02/24/09 at 16:35:21:


Coals to Newcastle.

But seriously, I don't think that sloughter's politics, however detestable they may be (I have no idea of there is any truth to these allegations), should be at issue here.  While I fully respect drkodos sensibilities, sloughter wasn't spouting this stuff here: someone had to go looking for it.

What I do think is relevant is that, as you can see from his Einstein article  and his other creations, he is utterly contemptuous of received truth across a wide range of intellectual endeavor.  In once sense that is admirable, truth could never advance without people to challenge what's taken for granted.  But when you set yourself up in field after field as a natural genius whose insights are profoundly revolutionary, you are either God's gift to humanity or something pretty close to a lunatic.  I rather think that sloughter is the latter.

If you read his Einstein piece, for example (http://www.aulis.com/albert_einstein.htm), you see that he not only accuses Einstein of stealing ideas (whether he did or not is nothing but a footnote to the history of modern physics, it would seem to me), but he seriously maintains that Eddington's work done later and validating general relativity was a hoax.  Eddington allegedly promulgated fraudulent results merely for the purpose of elevating Einstein.  I am not entirely sure whether sloughter doubts general relativity, but it's worth nothing that it has been amply verified since Eddington.  So it would not seem entirely surprising that Eddington's observations were consistent with Einstein's theory.

In any case I fail to see why this forum should be a regular venting-place for whatever dark aspects of sloughter's character lead always to the conclusion that he is the Sole Possesser of the One Truth.

Unlike drkodos, I would suffer a Nazi here so long as he didn't tout his Nazi ideas, but I would not suffer an obnoxiously vocal Mad Hatter whose insights into chess would be just as good if they had been obtained with the assistance of a telescope and an astrolabe.

AlanG wrote on 02/24/09 at 17:13:42:



Are you serious?  


So, do you hang out with Nazis and put their stuff on your website and attend their meetings as a guest lecturer?

Connect the dots he himself has drawn. 

If you are unwilling to do that honest work, then allow one who has to tell you what really is going on lest you be complicit in aiding and abetting the goals of these truly nefarious people, whose history of inhumanity is well documented.  

Do some homework on these folks:

Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party


Google that. 

AlanG wrote on 02/24/09 at 16:58:56:



Would you post those words on your site and defend them? 

Just wondering.

Another DIRECT QUOTE from Moody's work:

"Niggers in Africa wouldn't even accept this degenerate kike as a role model.  Why should our Christian children be forced to?"

His user name is an inside reference on what he thinks should be done to those people he has identified above.


Quite frankly, if Nazis are allowed to post here and use this site to generate more members of the cult of hatred, I will make sure to not renew and to tell my other friends likewise.  It is come to that.

A lot of members of the Tribe play chess and would not appreciate this guy being protected because of ignorance to what are his real goals.


If Nazis are at the party I am sure I will not attend.