Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 19
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit (Read 182226 times)
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 916
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #152 - 03/02/09 at 20:01:44
Post Tools
Taking a look at the Alchemy line (which upon closer inspection is more interesting than I first thought), indeed what does White have after 11...0-0?  The sacrifices on e6 don't work (though after 12.Bxe6 Black has to find 12...h6!) After 12.Qd2 Nbd7 White has some compensation but it looks doubtful whether it's enough.

How about the immediate sacrifice on e6?  I haven't seen any references to it in that article or in this thread so far.  (8.Ng5 Bg6) 9.Bxe6 fxe6 10.Nxe6 leaves Black a piece up for a pawn, but Black will be forced to forgo castling rights.  After 10...Qd7, White can try 11.Qe2 Kf7, though here Black can retreat the king to the fairly safe g8-square.  Alternatively 11.Bg5 Kf7 (11...Qxe6 12.Re1 Ne4 13.Qf3 Nxg5 14.Qg4 leaves Black with a rook and two pieces for the queen, but White maintains an attack; 13...Kd7 will leave Black's king exposed on the queenside) 12.d5 Be7 13.Qf3 is likely to net a second pawn for the piece, with unclear attacking chances.  Fritz doesn't think White has full compensation, but Black's position will be difficult to play at least.

The other sacrifice- 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bxe6- is less impressive in view of 10...Bd6 11.Re1 Qc7 when White doesn't have enough for the piece, and the king will eventually escape to the kingside.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OldGrizzly
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 61
Joined: 07/16/08
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #151 - 03/02/09 at 18:58:23
Post Tools
@Stefan Buecker: 12.h4 is very interesting after 11...Nd5. 
But I don't see any reason for Black to delay castling. After 11...0-0! 12.h4?! is met by 12...h6! Now a sac gives nothing. White has to go back with the Knight and Black is better. Any other thoughts?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 916
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #150 - 03/02/09 at 18:28:05
Post Tools
My problem is that I could potentially end up with this position via one of my main responses to the Caro-Kann: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.f3, and in practice my opponents have invariably replied with 4...exf3, 4...e5 or 4...e3, but there is always 4...Nf6 transposing.  (Many players play 4.Bc4 instead, but then 4...Nf6 5.f3 transposes).

Having seen the line 5.Nxe4 e5 (5.fxe4 e5 is similar) I am inclined to agree with Stefan Buecker- I'm happy to take a dynamically equal position, but not a sterile one (hence why I only took up the Goring Gambit when I found ways for White to generate dynamic equal play against 4...d5).  Thus it would be fruitful to search for the soundest way to continue in gambit style.

So if the Alchemy Variation is dubious for White, what are we left with?  I think if 5.Bg5, then I take the point that Black can argue that 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 Bg4 gives an improved version of the ...Bg4 lines as White's bishop does not normally go to g5.  However, White may be able to get some play with the continuation 7.Qd2 e6 8.Bd3 (or 7.Bd3 e6 8.Qd2) Nbd7 9.Ne5.  I don't think developing the bishop to c4 works as well; after 7...e6 8.Qd2 (8.Qe2 Bb4 9.a3 Bxc3+ 10.bxc3 Qa5 11.Bd2 =+) 8...Nbd7 and I see no way forward.

5.Be3 is rather passive (simply 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 Bf5 looks good) so that leaves Gambit's suggestion of 5.Bf4.  Then if 5...exf3 6.Nxf3 Bg4, White can consider 7.Qd2 Nbd7 8.Bd3 e6 9.Ne5 with similar play, but the bishop may be better placed on f4 than on g5.  Or simply 9.0-0-0.

I'm not convinced that any of these lines objectively give White enough, but they might be no worse than the Alchemy line.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #149 - 03/02/09 at 13:04:21
Post Tools
No, I was responding to SWJK's post.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #148 - 03/02/09 at 08:43:32
Post Tools
There is a third alternative: not to play the BDG at all. Are you saying that in the Alchemy you prefer maneuver (12.Bc1) to attack (12.h4)?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #147 - 03/02/09 at 04:50:10
Post Tools
Sometimes you have to settle for equality when no attack is possible. Unless you want to maneuver around?
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #146 - 03/01/09 at 13:41:55
Post Tools
SWJediknight wrote on 03/01/09 at 11:45:24:
I think the positions after 5.Nxe4 Nxe4 6.fxe4 e5 7.Nf3 exd4 are quite nice for White


7...exd4 8.Bc4 Bb4+ 9.c3! dxc3 10.Bxf7+ was Diemer's trick. In my correspondence with Volker Hergert I recommended instead 7...Be6, which leads to a situation similar to 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.f3 dxe4 4.fxe4 e5 5.Nf3 Be6!, with the difference that Ng8 and Nb1 are exchanged. I claimed that this exchange rather favored Black. Some participants of the thematic corr. tournament later organized by Hergert preferred 5...Bf5, the move recommended by Hergert. Hergert's book "Die O'Kelly-Verteidigung im Blackmar-Diemer-Gambit" (Düsseldorf 1993) has the games of that tournament. The general conclusion was that 4...c6 5.Nxe4 was equal, that alternatively 5.fxe4 e5 6.Nf3 exd4 7.Qxd4 = could be played, and that other 5th moves seemed to be worse. 

These "equal" lines are not what a BDG player is hoping for, and to claim that the BDG doesn't lose is not so sensational by itself. Both 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.c3 and 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 (Ignaz von Popiel) offer reasonable chances, but they are not popular. The real task (in my view) is to find a sound way in the spirit of the BDG, preferrably including an attack on the open files f and e.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 916
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #145 - 03/01/09 at 11:45:24
Post Tools
I think the positions after 5.Nxe4 Nxe4 6.fxe4 e5 7.Nf3 exd4 are quite nice for White, and even after 5...Bf5 and 5...Nbd7 I would be equally happy to take either colour.  (I prefer 5...Bf5 6.Nxf6+ to 6.Ng3).  5.f3 in the Caro-Kann does have some points, it helps support g2-g4 and increases White's control over the e4-square.  Correspondingly White will generally aim to castle on the queenside.

Gambit, what do you suggest after 5.Nxe4 e5?  I doubt that White has better than to go into a very barren ending.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #144 - 03/01/09 at 05:08:49
Post Tools
Big deal. So you have a Caro-Kann. It's not like White can't equalize here after 1. d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 c6 5.Nxe4 Bf5 6 Ng3.
Sounds like the White players did not play their openings properly if they lost from a simple position like this.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10777
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #143 - 02/28/09 at 13:06:52
Post Tools
I have written it before and I write it again: 1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 c6 5.Nxe4 is very poor. Of course Black will not help White with 5...Nxe4?!, even though that move is playable. After 5...Bf5 Black has a superior Caro-Kann. No conductor of the white pieces plays f2-f3 voluntarily after 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Bf5 or 4...Nf6. According to my database Black wins about half of the games.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Hadron
Full Member
***
Offline


Doctor, Doctor, Doctor..When
will you ever learn?

Posts: 195
Location: Levin, New Zealand.
Joined: 03/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #142 - 02/28/09 at 10:26:45
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 02/28/09 at 06:24:31:
Hadron wrote on 02/27/09 at 21:57:05:
ArKheiN wrote on 02/27/09 at 14:47:16:
But a3 is not thematic in the BDG...

Maybe not. I will be the first to say I am not a big fan of Lev's waffling but I have read some of his detailed analyses on various chess subjects and the puffery a side, his analysis was pretty good. I don't know really but maybe a3 in the circumstances he mentioned might be worth a look?
Undecided


Why, thank you! Yes, it is not a standard move in the BDG. But whoever said I made standard moves? My moves are all unorthodox!
So how about reading the article?

Sure, why not...
HTH
Angry
  

I'm reminded again of something Short wrote recently, approximately "The biggest fallacy in chess is the quasi-religious belief in the primacy of the opening."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #141 - 02/28/09 at 07:05:41
Post Tools
I must note I'm a bit puzzled with the annotations out there.
...c6 + ...Be6 is standard for this structure (Alekhin, Caro...)

Proper annotations should be:

6.Ne5?!
Misplacing the knight. It is only subject to exchange there,
as demonstrated in the Candidates Final Sokolov-Karpov.

6...c6 7.g4?!
Tal's plan of harassing the bishop with g4-h4 works only after ...e6

7...Be6
The bishop is forced on its optimal square. The knight is far from g5...

Here is an effortless draw:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1068564

And a decade earlier, a famous game;
pay attention to the waiting move 8.c3 !!
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1058000

Could it be that BDG players lack general chess knowedge?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #140 - 02/28/09 at 06:24:31
Post Tools
Hadron wrote on 02/27/09 at 21:57:05:
ArKheiN wrote on 02/27/09 at 14:47:16:
But a3 is not thematic in the BDG...

Maybe not. I will be the first to say I am not a big fan of Lev's waffling but I have read some of his detailed analyses on various chess subjects and the puffery a side, his analysis was pretty good. I don't know really but maybe a3 in the circumstances he mentioned might be worth a look?
Undecided


Why, thank you! Yes, it is not a standard move in the BDG. But whoever said I made standard moves? My moves are all unorthodox!
So how about reading the article?
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #139 - 02/27/09 at 23:55:10
Post Tools
I remembered about something: 5..Bf5 6.Ne5 c6!? 7.g4 Be6!? has been suggested by Bonsai in the forum somes years ago, and Patrik Shoupal defended the White side. Again a copy and past from Rajmund's page: http://www.mujweb.cz/www/rajmunde/gunde.htm

Gunderam var. with 6...c6 [D00]

1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 (Gunderam variant) 6.Ne5 c6!? Diagram


Advise pursuit on ChessPublishing forum. [Classical and mainly used pursuit is 6...e6 7.g4 , where White has indeed some activity.] 7.g4 [7.Bc4 e6 8.g4  (8.0-0 Bg6 9.Bg5 Be7! see ) 8...Nfd7! -/+ (8...Bg6 9.Bg5!?)  7...Be6 This stand-by cost position Black, with pawn in addition, is numerous adversary BDG enough preferred. 8.g5 Nd5 [8...Nfd7 9.Nd3 g6 10.Bg2 Bg7 11.Be3 0–0 12.0–0 Qb6 unclear (Leisebein - peber, remoteschach.de, 2005)] 9.Ne4 Nd7 10.Nxd7 Qxd7 11.Nc5 Qd6 12.Bg2 Nf4 13.Be4 Bd5 14.Qf3 Ng6 15.0–0 b6 16.c4 Ne5 17.Qf4 Nxc4 18.Bxd5 Qxd5 19.Na6 e5 20.Nc7+ Kd8 21.Qxf7 Qxf7 22.Rxf7 Nd6 23.Ne6+ Ke8 24.Rc7 Nb5 25.Rb7 Nd6 26.Rc7 Nb5 27.Rb7 Nd6 = (Schoupal - Bonsai, 1/2:1/2, ChessPublishing.com, forum, 2005) 

Who is able to find promising ways for white?

8.Bc4!?N Perhaps the only way how to obtain black fort...

Etc.

EDIT: I have found that old thread about 6..c6 7.g4 Be6 with the game Sevenviolets(Shoupal) vs Bonsai. 

http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1117050810/0
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Antidotes to the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
Reply #138 - 02/27/09 at 23:37:08
Post Tools

(1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3) 4...c6 5.Bc4 exf3 6.Nxf3 Bf5 7.0-0 e6 8.Ng5. The Alchemy Variation. 8...Bg6! 9.Ne2! Bd6 10.Nf4 Bxf4 11.Bxf4 Nd5 A few replies ago, MNb had kindly informed me about the site http://www.mujweb.cz/www/rajmunde/IntroEN2.htm , which gives an excellent overview over the state of the art of Alchemy. That site gives 12.Bc1 as the best continuation for White, but White's compensation appears dubious. - The move which I'd clearly prefer is 12.h4!.
 
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

Apparently a relevant position for the Alchemy Variation 8.Ng5. Now the main threat is 13.Bxd5 Qxd5 14.h5 Bf5 15.g4, and of course the motifs 13.Bd3 or 13. h5 also play a role. Black might try:

12...h6

(a) 12...h5? 13. Bd3! and White is better. 
(b) 12...0-0 13.Bxd5 followed by 14.h5 and 15.h6 looks interesting. For the moment, let's call it unclear.
(c) 12...Nxf4 13.Rxf4 Qe7 14.Qg4 should not be underestimated, for example 14...Nd7 15.Re1 Qb4 16.Qe2 Qd6 17.Qf2 0-0 18.h5! Bxh5 19.Qh4 Bg6 20.Rxf7! Rxf7 21.Rxe6 Qb4 22.Rxg6 =.

13.Nxe6 fxe6 14.Qg4 Bf5 15.Qxg7.

White's attack may be sufficient for a draw, for example: 

15...Rh7 16.Qg8+ (Qg3) 16...Kd7 17.Qg3 Nxf4 18.Rxf4 Na6 19.Rxf5 exf5 20.Be6+. 

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *

The resulting endings remind me of a Muzio Gambit. Black is better, so this should not be your choice in a corr. game. But for an OTB game, and considering the fact that Black has to find a few good moves, before he enters the second diagram, the "Alchemy" may well be White's best try against 4...c6. It isn't clear that Black can force a win. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 19
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo