Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
Excuse me, Mr. Coward, but my responses have a point.
Not that I - and with me a few others - have noticed. FYI: Coward is not the English translation for Nieuweboer. As that one is probably too long, just call me Mr. MNb.
Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
First, you guys seem to frigging worship the computer
Not as much as you seem to worship your backside, which pops up in your posts in and out of season. And we already know that silicon analysis scares you the pants off. No need to remind us.
Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
Second, I have no idea what Diemer wrote in 1943. Care to translate the article and post it here?
No, but I might in your Confederacy thread. If you learn some manners.
Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
Third, I suggested, and others agreed, that after 4...c6 5 Nxe4 was best. Then 5...Nxe4 6 fxe4 e5 7 Bc4 is what Diemer used to play.
But that has been discussed here.
And also has been discussed that 5...Bf5 is superior. Again fully in the spirit of Diemer you don't care to give Black's best.
Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
Fourth, after 5...Bf5 6 Ne5 e6 7 g4 Bg6 8 g5 Nd5 9 Qf3 White has the edge.
See Third.
Gambit wrote on 03/10/09 at 12:56:25:
Fifth, I'll try to post the 1997 article if I can.
Now that would be nice. Not the whole article, I am not going to waste my time going over dozens of irrelevant lines, just a couple of main lines.
I'm not interested in computer analyses because as I stated earlier, men should use their own heads, not the computer! Simple as that.
seems okay for White. Unless you mean
No, you worship the computer and kiss my backside. Your own backside is sitting on a cactus, by which a broken chess engine stands. Too much analyses!!
And, OK, I will see what I can do to repost the 1997 article.