Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Stonewall dutch (Read 23334 times)
brabo
God Member
*****
Offline


Welcome chessfriend

Posts: 1068
Joined: 02/02/07
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #24 - 05/17/13 at 13:59:54
Post Tools
kandido wrote on 05/17/13 at 13:13:57:
Albeit, de really Stonewall interested chessfans should ofcourse follow the recent games of GM Sadler. His latest game against Ivanchuk showed his love for this recently found opening. But then again, the guy lives in Holland for over 10 years now.

That wasn't a stonewall. I even made a post about it on chesspub: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1368034968
I assume you are joking as there is no such thing as openings being played more by a nationality due to the name of the opening.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
kandido
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 3
Location: Netherlands
Joined: 12/03/08
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #23 - 05/17/13 at 13:13:57
Post Tools
Albeit, de really Stonewall interested chessfans should ofcourse follow the recent games of GM Sadler. His latest game against Ivanchuk showed his love for this recently found opening. But then again, the guy lives in Holland for over 10 years now.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2533
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #22 - 04/10/13 at 18:24:49
Post Tools
The good-natured humor is fine, what I meant was that I'd prefer it be confined to relevant threads, like the "Is the Albin any good?" thread. 

I don't think that anyone wants to see years-old threads resurrected for no reason other than to mock the subject matter.  If attactics had asked a relevant question or contributed something to the discussion, that would have been great.  He did a similar thing in the "My interesting Stonewall game" thread. 

Sorry that my tone is harsh, I hope attactics ends up fitting in and participating.  I'm glad that he finally found the Albin thread!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Eclectico
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 99
Joined: 04/10/08
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #21 - 04/06/13 at 22:57:39
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 04/06/13 at 07:47:33:
attactics wrote on 04/06/13 at 07:20:00:
make it stop! make it stop!

trying to learn the albin countergambit so i can at least break some of my stonewall addiction


As far as I can tell, this discussion had stopped--four years ago.  That's years.

Quite the way to introduce yourself to the forum.


Erm... this poster just demonstrated his vast superiority to 90% of the new posters... he can use the search tools! 

Quite the way to introduce unnecessary antagonism to a new poster.

To the OP,  I think what Eric meant was "We tend to prefer posts here with chess content.  Please share your good natured humor in the chit-chat forum."
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2533
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #20 - 04/06/13 at 07:47:33
Post Tools
attactics wrote on 04/06/13 at 07:20:00:
make it stop! make it stop!

trying to learn the albin countergambit so i can at least break some of my stonewall addiction


As far as I can tell, this discussion had stopped--four years ago.  That's years.

Quite the way to introduce yourself to the forum.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
attactics
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 20
Joined: 04/06/13
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #19 - 04/06/13 at 07:20:00
Post Tools
make it stop! make it stop!

trying to learn the albin countergambit so i can at least break some of my stonewall addiction
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Glenn Snow
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Franklin
Joined: 09/27/03
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #18 - 05/19/09 at 03:55:08
Post Tools
Quote:
Bogojump wrote on May 11th, 2009, 11:11am:
I possibly could find interesting is  Nh3-system but then black often plays the bishop back to e7 and the knight just look stupid on h3.

The idea of the Nh3-system is to transfer it via f4 to d3, which is perfectly possible after ...Be7. The manoeuvre is not a loss of tempo compared to Ng1-f3-e1-d3.


I think what Bogojump meant is that in the variation with Nh3 and Bf4 in response to ...Bd6, Black often plays ...Be7 to attempt to leave the White pieces in a bit of a tangle.

I looked for the thread discussing Cox's method versus the Leningrad but I can't seem to find it now.  I did find this very short thread suggesting one possible problem to his method: http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1232030008

Regarding the above variation where Black pulls the Bishop back to e7, in the thread I can't find I mentioned a variation where White first plays b3 "threatening" Ba3 which induces Qe7, then White plays Bf4 (with Nh3 already played) when obviously Black's queen is in the way of a retreat to e7.  I haven't really looked into this to know whether this is any good.

I'm actually looking forward to the new book(s) due to come out on the Stonewall.

In the thread "New Stonewall book, the table of contents gives
"Lesson 2 The Critical 7 b3 Qe7 8 Ne5!" so perhaps this is the way to go?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #17 - 05/14/09 at 06:21:54
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 05/14/09 at 05:53:26:
I won't dispute your general comments - I am just curious why you rate 5.Bd2 higher than 5.Nbd2.
a) 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ 6.Nbxd2 0-0 7.e4 fxe4 8.Nxe4 Nc6 9.Be2 Qe7 10.0-0 e5 and Black has achieved his/her main goal ...
b) 5.Nbd2 0-0 6.e3 b6 and I feel the bishop on b4 worse than on e7, but me knowing zilch about the MNb5 might be wrong.
Of course this demands flexibility if the Stonewall is Black's main defence. It isn't mine.
Another question: what about 1.Nf3 e6 (or d6) intending 2...f5 ? Now 2.d3 is not very attractive anymore, is it?


In a) is there anything to the idea of 0-0-0 for white at some point, instead of the quieter Be2/0-0? Even perhaps just 11.d5 followed up by c5 before black can get ...d6 in? *shrug* That'd make for an interesting discussion, but the fact 4...b6 equalizes quickly almost makes it pointless.

I only rated it higher because it was more common, I didn't give much thought to 5.Nbd2, honestly. Maybe it's worth looking into as well, it could be fertile ground. It just seems white does well enough after 5.Bd2 statistically that I didn't see a reason to look for more. I should know better than relying on statistics...  Smiley

1. Nf3 e6 2.c4 f5 and black will have to deal with annoying d3/e4 anti-Stonewall plans after 3.g3. On the upside, at least he'll have avoided the set-up earlier that can't be avoided via the Semi-Slav move order, and 1...f5 is easy enough to side-step by itself. The huge upside to the Semi-Slav move order is that white has committed himself to d4, if I remember correctly. However, as we've seen, black has to either deal with that set-up that scores really well for white, or be denied the Stonewall altogether because of 5.Bg5!?

Last time I checked the Stonewall doesn't fare so hot against English structures, but admittedly I have no access to theory on that area. If anyone has anything of relevance, I'd be happy to see it.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #16 - 05/14/09 at 05:53:26
Post Tools
I won't dispute your general comments - I am just curious why you rate 5.Bd2 higher than 5.Nbd2.
a) 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ 6.Nbxd2 0-0 7.e4 fxe4 8.Nxe4 Nc6 9.Be2 Qe7 10.0-0 e5 and Black has achieved his/her main goal ...
b) 5.Nbd2 0-0 6.e3 b6 and I feel the bishop on b4 worse than on e7, but me knowing zilch about the QID might be wrong.
Of course this demands flexibility if the Stonewall is Black's main defence. It isn't mine.
Another question: what about 1.Nf3 e6 (or d6) intending 2...f5 ? Now 2.d3 is not very attractive anymore, is it?
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #15 - 05/14/09 at 00:08:55
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 05/13/09 at 14:32:30:
BPaulsen wrote on 05/13/09 at 11:32:39:
It's safe to say 4...Bb4+ is not very good for black after 5.Bd2.


Why? 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ and cannot Black reach an IZ with the bishops of the dark squares exchanged? That improves Black's chances considerably as the thematic ...e6-e5 becomes easier. Or is 6.Nbxd2 followed by 7.e4 that strong? If yes then 5...Qe7 should be good enough.
As a general rule I fear x...Bb4+ y.Nbd2 more. White develops rapidly, gets the pair of bishops so ...e6-e5 will favour him and will initiate a pawn storm on the queenside. It's often very hard to develop counterplay.


5...Qe7 would likely have to be played, maybe it's okay. Otherwise 6.Nbxd2 followed by e4 is += as far as I can tell. Anyway, 5...Qe7 6. Bxb4! Qxb4 7.Nbd2 (followed by a quick a3 and e4) and black has let white achieve his aims.

I think black equalizes after 4...b6 anyway, since white can't achieve his goals and is left with an impotent version of a QID where black has achieved ...f5 without resorting to ...Ne4.

Against 1...f5 move orders white has other things he can do to avoid getting Stonewalled if he doesn't feel like it, anyway, so my post was mostly about the Semi-Slav Stonewall. The specifically Dutch move orders aren't as big a deal, heck they don't even seem to be the most popular route.

(For the record, I play 1.Nf3 so the Semi-Slav Stonewall is after transpositions, and against 1...f5 I just play 2.d3 because it takes zero effort to prepare, and still offers some chances of an edge even after the most accurate 2...Nc6).
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Bibs
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2338
Joined: 10/24/06
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #14 - 05/14/09 at 00:01:40
Post Tools
I think it is commonly understood at a certain level that 2 c4 is sub-optimal against the dutch because of ...Bb4 check lines.

Choose to believe me or not.
Simply look at high class move-orders. Always 2Nf3, 3g3 etc. This is the reason.

Presume this must be written somewhere.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #13 - 05/13/09 at 14:32:30
Post Tools
BPaulsen wrote on 05/13/09 at 11:32:39:
It's safe to say 4...Bb4+ is not very good for black after 5.Bd2.


Why? 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ and cannot Black reach an IZ with the bishops of the dark squares exchanged? That improves Black's chances considerably as the thematic ...e6-e5 becomes easier. Or is 6.Nbxd2 followed by 7.e4 that strong? If yes then 5...Qe7 should be good enough.
As a general rule I fear x...Bb4+ y.Nbd2 more. White develops rapidly, gets the pair of bishops so ...e6-e5 will favour him and will initiate a pawn storm on the queenside. It's often very hard to develop counterplay.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #12 - 05/13/09 at 11:38:53
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 05/13/09 at 04:26:24:
Well, 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 c6 4. Qc2 Nf6 often doesn't become a Closed Catalan, though it certainly could.


True, there's some other 5th move deviations aside from attempts at playing the Catalan via 5.Nbd2/5.g3

5.Bg5 and 5.Nbd2 can both lead to different positions entirely.

Whatever the case, those aren't Stonewalls, and white players that use 4.Qc2 aren't going to be kept up at night worrying about 4...Nf6 since it is most common anyways.  Grin
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #11 - 05/13/09 at 11:32:39
Post Tools
tafl wrote on 05/13/09 at 06:29:47:
@BPaulsen:
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e6 4.Qc2 is very rare and looks risky after 4...dxc4. I therefore assume you mean 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2. This is only an option if you also meet 2...e6 with 3.Nf3, something many consider a minor consession. Anyway, this isn't much of a problem for a Slav Stonewall player after 4...Bd6 followed by 5...f5.


Yes, 3.Nf3.

It isn't a "minor concession", it's a common tool to transpose directly into the Catalan. It's only a "minor concesssion" if white intends to play QGD lines exclusively.

If 4...Bd6!? then 5. Bg5!? and no Stonewall. If someone is a Semi-Slav/Stonewall player, then he's not going to have fun in that line.

Quote:
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2!? is quite rare but has been played by Tregubov among others. 4...Bb4+ looks interesting but 4...b6 is the most logical (it's not always so easy for Black to develop his queenside in the Dutch) and scores very well. 5.g3 Bb7 6.Bg2 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 O-O 9.O-O Qe7 (9...c5 also seems fine) 10.Rad1 d6 11.Ne1 Bxg2 12.Nxg2 Nbd7 13.e4 fxe4 14.Nxe4 e5 15.Rfe1 Nxe4 16.Rxe4 Qf7  looked very comfortable for Black in Tukmakov-Vaisser, Moscow 1989 which is one of very few high level games in the line.


It's safe to say 4...Bb4+ is not very good for black after 5.Bd2. 4...b6 is probably best.

Either way, black is forced out of his Stonewall, and that's an entirely different line to address.

There's always other things that can be used to deal with Stonewalls arising from 1...f5 anyway, and my post was mainly focused on the Semi-Slav Stonewall.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
tafl
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 380
Location: Norway
Joined: 05/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: Stonewall dutch
Reply #10 - 05/13/09 at 06:29:47
Post Tools
@BPaulsen:
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e6 4.Qc2 is very rare and looks risky after 4...dxc4. I therefore assume you mean 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2. This is only an option if you also meet 2...e6 with 3.Nf3, something many consider a minor consession. Anyway, this isn't much of a problem for a Slav Stonewall player after 4...Bd6 followed by 5...f5.

1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nf3 e6 4.Qc2!? is quite rare but has been played by Tregubov among others. 4...Bb4+ looks interesting but 4...b6 is the most logical (it's not always so easy for Black to develop his queenside in the Dutch) and scores very well. 5.g3 Bb7 6.Bg2 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 O-O 9.O-O Qe7 (9...c5 also seems fine) 10.Rad1 d6 11.Ne1 Bxg2 12.Nxg2 Nbd7 13.e4 fxe4 14.Nxe4 e5 15.Rfe1 Nxe4 16.Rxe4 Qf7  looked very comfortable for Black in Tukmakov-Vaisser, Moscow 1989 which is one of very few high level games in the line.
  

A computer once beat me at chess but it was no match for me at kick boxing - Emo Philips
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo