Normal Topic C05: Tarrasch: Why 8...g5 rather than 7... g5? (Read 3081 times)
Mikejrw
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 17
Joined: 09/02/09
Re: Tarrasch: Why 8...g5 rather than 7... g5?
Reply #3 - 10/21/09 at 22:21:31
Post Tools
Move order appears to be very important here as the resulting positions can be very different.

I was focusing specifically on MNb's second move order with g5 being played.

I understand the former contributor, Neil McDonald, in his e4 book suggests that second move order.

It is at that point, 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.c3 c5 6.Ngf3 Nc6 7.Bd3  when 7...g5 looks interesting. I can't find many long-play games on it though, although I have lost a rapidplay game on the white side of it.

I was wondering if anyone had any experience in that? Possible moves for white I understand are 8 0-0 and 8 g4, although 8 g4 might be answered by 8... h5
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Tarrasch: Why 8...g5 rather than 7... g5?
Reply #2 - 10/21/09 at 09:50:19
Post Tools
iirc 7....g5 on that move order even got reccomended on Zeigler's DVD?

There's also the same idea via either 3..a6, or 3..h6 4 Ngf3 etc - both mentioned in chapters of Watsons DW French book. Either changes the position a slightly surprising amount.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10779
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Tarrasch: Why 8...g5 rather than 7... g5?
Reply #1 - 10/21/09 at 01:16:22
Post Tools
Assuming that you are thinking of 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.c3 c5 the answer is simple: White does not have played the knight to f3 yet. 6.f4 and 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.Ne2 are more popular. After the gambit 6.Ngf3 Nc6 7.Bd3 (cxd4 8.cxd4 Qb6 "wins" a pawn) your proposal ...g5 has been tried a few times indeed.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mikejrw
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 17
Joined: 09/02/09
C05: Tarrasch: Why 8...g5 rather than 7... g5?
10/20/09 at 22:13:26
Post Tools
IM Kevin Goh Wei Ming has looked at 8... g5 in the 3... Be7 Tarrasch this month.

The positions certainly appear dynamic and white has good chances to gain the initiative.

One question I had is that 3... Be7 can be omitted so that black plays 7... g5 with the bishop sitting on f8.

I am surprised this isn't played more often because if white now plays dxc5, black can contemplate playing Bxc5 in one move.

Does anybody know why black players insist on having the bishop on e7 before playing g5? It seems to me that playing g5 straight away gives black more options...

Huh
« Last Edit: 07/24/11 at 08:46:31 by dom »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo