Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Why is the Scotch so strange? (Read 16025 times)
ChessMonkey
Full Member
***
Offline


You may ask yourself,
well, how did I get here?

Posts: 110
Location: NYC
Joined: 04/10/08
Re: Why is the Scotch so strange?
Reply #2 - 01/22/10 at 16:33:06
Post Tools
Sharpplay,

I cracked up when I saw your post Grin  That's exactly the way I feel.  A few weeks ago I ordered Barsky's book (having watched in December some of Andy's Martin's DVD on Kasparov's Scotch (Foxy) which I had purchased for my son 2+ years ago) to try to have something else to play beside the Ruy, but having been through a few chapters and then having tried some of it on ICC, I find the positions really weird to play!  Same thing happened when I "experimented" with the Sveshnikov Sicilian  Cheesy

I'm now trying to learn more about the Ruy Lopez since at least I have a feel for what I'm "supposed" to be doing in the opening phase in the Spanish instead of floundering around in the Scotch. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
zoo
Ex Member


Re: Why is the Scotch so strange?
Reply #1 - 01/22/10 at 15:32:53
Post Tools
Most people play the Scotch because they don't want to bother with the intricacies of the Spanish, or because they don't fancy to meet some Spanish lines on a particular day (but here the Italian is perhaps more suitable, as you can keep it simple with Bb3-d3-c3). Since it is Black who chooses the system, White has to be ready for a variety of mainlines, while Black has to be ready for a variety of deviations ; Black quite often has homefield advantage.
In your variation of the Scotch, White plays for long term advantage (better pawn structure, bishop pair) and Black has early activity due to faster development. White has to negociate some early pitfalls, and must solve the problem of its pieces (Bishop to g2, f4 to sustain e5, how to develop the queenside, which move order depending if you want to allow an imbalanced ending). The position becomes very tense, sometimes White is happy to let go of the e pawn in order to complete development and start playing on Black's weaknesses.
in a sense I feel that White is the good guy in the Scotch, whereas it is the opposite in the Spanish. But that is just the view of a Scotch player Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sharpplay
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 72
Joined: 03/24/08
Why is the Scotch so strange?
01/22/10 at 14:34:57
Post Tools
On the surface, it seems that by being the most open open game, the Scotch should be simple.  It's cousin, the Scotch 4 knights, is a fairly simple open game.  When I look at the mainline Scotch though, especially the Mieses, it looks like the open games on some kind of mind-altering drugs.  White is playing b3 and g3, Bb2 and black is often fianchettoing with g6, Bg7.  The queens on the e-file block their light bishops and both sides get focused on the c4 pawn.  It seems strange that such basic moves as 1 e4, 2 Nf3 and 3 d4 would lead to such a sophisticated opening.  I don't mind playing against it as black but I have never felt right trying to "drive" the white side of it.  Is there anyone out there who plays the Scotch as white who can explain to me why they like it?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo