SWJediknight wrote on 02/20/10 at 00:18:59:
1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 dxe4 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.Qe2 is also closely related to an Englund Gambit line (1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 Qe7 4.Qd5 b6). The major difference is that Black has locked in the queen's bishop with ...e6 (in the aforementioned Englund Gambit line, 5.e3?! is hardly critical) and so can't play ...Bg4 encouraging f2-f3 at an inopportune moment. As a result White has full compensation here.
I recall that the b2-b3 approaches in the 1.e4 d5 2.Qe2 Scandinavian line don't work, because Black can play ...Nc6-d4 before White gets the chance to castle queenside- again the key is in the omission of ...e6, a tempo that Black can spend more wisely.
In the first line, is 5...Be7 6.Ne4 Ne4 7.Qe4 Bf6 meant to be the equaliser? This is a serious question, by the way.
I agree with you on the second point, although my comments on 2.Qe2 and 2.Ne2 were not meant to be taken seriously.
PS: My post is far too serious. Apparently I need to lighten up a bit.
__________________________________________________
A chess master died - after a few days, a friend of his heard a voice; it was him!
"What's it like, where you are now," he asked.
"What do you want to hear first, the good news or the bad news."
"Tell me the good news first."
"Well, it's really heaven here. There are tournaments and blitz sessions going on all the time and Morphy, Alekhine, Lasker, Tal, Capablanca, Botvinnik, they're all here, and you can play them."
"Fantastic!" the friend said, "and what is the bad news?"
"You have Black against Capablanca on Saturday."