Here are some quick notes by me and one of my friends after we looked at this game a couple of weeks ago at chespro.ru. It seems to us that some evaluations are too optimistic.
- 18. ... Kc6 is an error after which Black is lost, better is 18. ... Kd8 and White is "only" better.
- 15. ... Nf7 seems to be better than 15. ... Kd7 (as in the game) with 16.fxe3 g6! 17.Nxg6 hxg6 18.Qxg6 Qxe3+! 19.Kh1 Qg5! and White is better but not as in the game
- 14. ... Be3?! looks suspicious to us. In variation 14. ... g6!? we can not agree with the evaluation of "White is better" after 20.Rac1 because we are not sure that White is better at all. White has 3:2 kingside pawn majority but his pawns are weak and there are opposite coloured bishops on the board. White is slightly better with 19.Bxc5 (instead of 19.Rfe1) leaving queens on the board, but we cannot say how promising that advantage is.
This is only a quick analyse we made at that time and of course it might have a holes. But White's idea and the game are quite interesting and deserve serious attention.