@Moreno : If I compared my "pal" idea with your kid's idea, it is only because he liked to close early center with c4...no more....

If you believe I cannot assume a kid (yours or another) can have an interesting idea about one chess position, I am sorry, but it's not the case....the truth is I prefer everybody gives his assessment of moves with some arguments  in chess language.

Thanks Keano for giving the benefit of doubt to my kid's idea, obviously she is only 13 and most probably her analysis would have some holes, it is not like your VMC friend DOM, it is not the same situation because you are comparing a kid that is improving and practices chess in the high level competition with your pal who probably is happy playing the weekend's tournaments, it is a different approach, obviously she never played that line in official tournaments because her attitude to chess is different than me for example, but her idea was not that bad as some of you point out, read the following:
Another defence by
the knight, 7...Ng6, was one of
several barricade methods à la Petrosian. I
don’t know if it is playable, but a clear refutation is yet to be found: 8.h4!? h5! 9.Qg3
Qa5!? (un fortunately the idea 9...b6? is not
play able be cause of 10.Bd3!) 10.Bd2 Nc6
11.Bd3 Nce7 12.dxc5! (12.Nf3 c4!=)  12...Nf5!N ( 12...Qxc5 13.Nf3+= was
seen in Liberzon- Petrosian, Moscow 1964)
13.Bxf5! exf5
This could be the new key position of this
line. Black is still very solid here.

VIKTOR MOSKALENKO IN HIS NEW BOOK WONDERFUL WINAWER
Maybe some of you because I said that it was my kid's idea took that very light and even some like DOM went off the point comparing my daughter's idea with his club pal, but now that Moskalenko thinks that the line is solid for black many of you would have a different approach to this line, or even better if the former world champion Petrossian would tell you that this line is playable I do not think DOM would compare Petrossian's idea with his VMC pal.
Finally, my kids coach was somewhat impressed with the line and he analyzed that for more than one week, for him the plan for white was not as easy as some of you thought, but after week he found a refutation which involves an early f4, I do not remember well the line that he showed me but I will ask him to show me that refutation again and I will let you know over the weekend.

7 .. Nf5 perhaps a better implementation of much the same idea. As I remember thats meant to be more or less acceptable, although not at all fashionable for whatever reason(s).

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. Qg4 Ng6 8. h4
h5 9. Qg3 c4 10. Ne2 Nc6 11. Bg5 Qa5 12. Qe3 Nce7 13. Ng3 Bd7 14. Be2 O-O-O 15.
Nxh5
looks quite convincing for white.

Hello, as I told you my kids practice chess and my daughter is a Frenchie as me, the other day I was showing her the possibilities in the Winawer besides the poisining pawn variation, as showing her 7)..., 0-0; 7)...,Kf8 even 7)...,g6 and suddenly she said "Dad I like 7)..., Ng6 ", my first reaction was to tell her that her option is bad and she should forget about it, but I remembered a friend of mine who told me not to break my kid's creativity, so I decided to show her that the variation was not good with concrete analysis, so I told her that the knight will be in problems after 8)h4, she answered 8)...,h5 then I went 9)Qg3 and she answered 9)...,c4 ; then I realized her point, she said that the light square white bishop never will reach the square d3, and that if 7)...Kf8 or 7)...g6 are playable then 7)...Ng6 must be playable as well. So we start researching in the database and we found a game played by Petrosian!! in the sixties which lost after: 1)e4,e6; 2)d4,d5; 3)Nc3,Bb4; 4)e5,c5; 5)a3,Bc3; 6)bc,Ne7; 7)Qg4,Ng6!?; 8)h4,h5; 9)Qg3,Qa5!?; 10)Bd2,Nc6; 11)Bd3,Nce7; 12)dc5,Qc5; 13)Nf3,Bd7; 14)00,Bb5; 15)Be3 1-0
We think (me and my daughter) that is very important not to allow Bd3, so after 10)Bd2 Petrosian should have played 10)...c4 and then follow the same plan Nc6 -e7; get the black light square bishop to a4 aiming towards the weak c2 pawn and move the queen back to the kingside.
This variation I played against FRITZ12 which beat me but I think I came out of the opening well, I use this variation in blitz games with a plus score so far.
What do you think about this line?? Is there any work regarding 7)...Ng6!?; please let me know your thoughts regarding this line which I am about to use it in FIDE rated tournaments soon.

Thanks in advance for your answers.