(UTC)
  ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › Nimzo and Benonis › QID › Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
(Moderator: proustiskeen)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Curiousity in the Queen's Indian (Read 115433 times)
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #68 - 03/31/13 at 15:32:08
Post Tools
Girkassa wrote on 03/30/13 at 17:23:22:
I thought the general opinion about the Budapest was that White is slightly better in pretty much all major lines. Which does not mean that it is refuted, but it gives White a pleasant choice. The Aronian-Ivanchuk game fits well with that view, I think.


Ah, sorry, refuted is a too strong word.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Girkassa
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 433
Joined: 04/07/07
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #67 - 03/30/13 at 17:23:22
Post Tools
I thought the general opinion about the Budapest was that White is slightly better in pretty much all major lines. Which does not mean that it is refuted, but it gives White a pleasant choice. The Aronian-Ivanchuk game fits well with that view, I think.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TicklyTim
Senior Member
****
Offline


can I take that back,
please...

Posts: 274
Location: England
Joined: 05/29/09
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #66 - 03/30/13 at 15:07:15
Post Tools
Is it considered refuted?
I had quite a look at most of Whites lines and found it hard to find anything more that a small advantage. I thought there would be something more somewhere but failed to find it...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #65 - 03/30/13 at 13:17:15
Post Tools
Girkassa wrote on 03/30/13 at 12:25:04:
Unless he has some improvement ready, I strongly doubt he would take such a chance.


I kinda agree, but who knows? Apparently Ivanchuk had enough trust in the Budapest gambit to play it in the Candidates tournament, despite it being considered almost refuted.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Girkassa
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 433
Joined: 04/07/07
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #64 - 03/30/13 at 12:25:04
Post Tools
Unless he has some improvement ready, I strongly doubt he would take such a chance.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #63 - 03/30/13 at 11:29:21
Post Tools
BobbyDigital80 wrote on 03/29/13 at 23:45:34:
Michael Adams recently played this line as black. It's interesting that he didn't know it was refuted.


How do you know that he didn't know, maybe he took a chance?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BobbyDigital80
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 357
Joined: 05/15/08
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #62 - 03/29/13 at 23:45:34
Post Tools
Michael Adams recently played this line as black. It's interesting that he didn't know it was refuted.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3191
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #61 - 03/02/13 at 14:09:01
Post Tools
tony37 wrote on 03/02/13 at 12:44:14:

still I think this is no fun for black to play, but better than taking the pawn

I agree, the Sargissian game looked very convincing for White.
  
Back to top
WWWFacebookTwitter  
IP Logged
 
tony37
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Joined: 10/16/10
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #60 - 03/02/13 at 12:44:14
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 03/02/13 at 12:24:05:
tony37 wrote on 03/01/13 at 22:58:35:
but in the game Sargissian-Socko the move 9.e4!! wasn't played so I guess he simply didn't read this thread.

After 9...d6 isn't this likely to transpose?

I supposed it didn't, but now I see you're right
still I think this is no fun for black to play, but better than taking the pawn
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3191
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #59 - 03/02/13 at 12:24:05
Post Tools
tony37 wrote on 03/01/13 at 22:58:35:
but in the game Sargissian-Socko the move 9.e4!! wasn't played so I guess he simply didn't read this thread.

After 9...d6 isn't this likely to transpose?
  
Back to top
WWWFacebookTwitter  
IP Logged
 
tony37
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Joined: 10/16/10
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #58 - 03/01/13 at 22:58:35
Post Tools
I see John Emms talks about this "5...c5!?" move in his update, he also mentions 7.cxd5 but in the game Sargissian-Socko the move 9.e4!! wasn't played so I guess he simply didn't read this thread. But he's not the only one who doesn't know about this because 2 of my correspondence chess opponents walked right into this line (games ongoing)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #57 - 10/12/12 at 15:32:41
Post Tools
Well, the Bogo-Indian has been a major alternative to the Queen's Indian since approximately forever, and as I recall 3...b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Bb4+ was a favorite of Capablanca.  Sometimes I have to wonder how far the apparent current tendencies of hyperspecialization and recent-publication-ism can go ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #56 - 10/12/12 at 08:32:13
Post Tools
In the latest Yearbook there is an article on 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ (Bogo) 4.Bd2 Bxd2, which i see it an a nice short-cut of theory if you want to complete a repertoire with Black using the Nimzo. Maybe you can consider this if you don't want to bother with the QID!  Smiley Btw, i like this idea (Bb4+ followed Bxd2) in the QID after 3...b6 4.g3 Bb7 as Marin analysed in a couple of CBM articles.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BobbyDigital80
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 357
Joined: 05/15/08
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #55 - 10/07/12 at 03:18:59
Post Tools
I've started studying 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7, which is a Tiviakov recommendation. I hope it's fully sound, because I don't want to learn the main line with 4...Ba6 or the old classical line with 4...Bb7 5.Bg2 Be7.  Tongue
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BobbyDigital80
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 357
Joined: 05/15/08
Gender: Male
Re: Curiousity in the Queen's Indian
Reply #54 - 09/28/12 at 09:05:59
Post Tools
What a shame! I liked playing this variation as black. Time to find something else.   Angry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge