Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) C57-C59: What to do against 4.Ng5 in 2 knights? (Read 104133 times)
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #26 - 02/21/11 at 19:17:04
Post Tools
ArKheiN wrote on 02/21/11 at 18:27:28:
Matemax, the GM is not sure about equality for White or for Black with 4.Ng5?

About the quality for Black to play 3...Nf6 and so allowing 4.Ng5 - GM Gusti therefore opts for 3...Bc5 stating that he is not sure of equality for Black after 4.Ng5
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #25 - 02/21/11 at 18:27:28
Post Tools
Matemax, the GM is not sure about equality for White or for Black with 4.Ng5?

Sloughter, there is other way to play the Black side of the position, for example starting with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 O-O 10.Nc3 Rb8 11.O-O h6 12.Nge4 Nd5 13.Ng3 Nb4 .
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
NeverGiveUp
Full Member
***
Offline


Never despair in a lost
position

Posts: 221
Joined: 11/18/09
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #24 - 02/21/11 at 16:53:53
Post Tools
What's the verdict on 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.ed5: Na5 6.Bb5+ Bd7? That's a very reasonable reply if followed up by 7.Qe2 Be7! rather than Bd6. Anyone agrees?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #23 - 02/21/11 at 16:52:23
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 02/21/11 at 02:52:29:
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 15:23:23:
GM Gustafsson is also not sure, if there is really equality after 4.Ng5 on his DVD


For players of the Black pieces the 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 is an excellent theoretical choice because Fritz 12 likes Black's chances after the main line 6.Bb5ch c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2? Players of the Black pieces should welcome this move; that is why I prefer 8.Qf3. Here are the best plans for Black.

1) It is critical that you play 8...h6 so that White cannot play 9.d3/Ne4,

2) Hit the Knight retreat to h3 with g5 (the Steinitz Defense), or hit the Knight if it retreats to f3 immediately with e4 to provoke Ne5,

3) After White plays Ne5, then Bc5/Bd6 is too nuanced; play Bd6,

4) Regardless whether White plays f4 or d4, capture en passant to open lines,

5) Castle and centralize your Rooks; your Queen belongs on c7 so that the battery against h2 forces White to waste a tempo on h3,

6) Look for targets of opportunity,

7) If none appear then play c5/Nc6/c4 to pry open the position.

Whether you play against either 8.Bd3 or 8.Qf3, the general rule of thumb is that you should try to force White to capture a Black Knight on d5 with a Knight or Bishop so that you wind up with pawns on d5/e5/f5. If you acquire that pawn phalanx in the center, then Black is usually better.

To repeat my statement: GM Jan Gustafsson, rated 2.652, is not sure - WITH an engine on his side. You think Fritz12 WITHOUT a GM does better?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #22 - 02/21/11 at 02:52:29
Post Tools
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 15:23:23:
GM Gustafsson is also not sure, if there is really equality after 4.Ng5 on his DVD


For players of the Black pieces the 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 is an excellent theoretical choice because Fritz 12 likes Black's chances after the main line 6.Bb5ch c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2? Players of the Black pieces should welcome this move; that is why I prefer 8.Qf3. Here are the best plans for Black.

1) It is critical that you play 8...h6 so that White cannot play 9.d3/Ne4,

2) Hit the Knight retreat to h3 with g5 (the Steinitz Defense), or hit the Knight if it retreats to f3 immediately with e4 to provoke Ne5,

3) After White plays Ne5, then Bc5/Bd6 is too nuanced; play Bd6,

4) Regardless whether White plays f4 or d4, capture en passant to open lines,

5) Castle and centralize your Rooks; your Queen belongs on c7 so that the battery against h2 forces White to waste a tempo on h3,

6) Look for targets of opportunity,

7) If none appear then play c5/Nc6/c4 to pry open the position.

Whether you play against either 8.Bd3 or 8.Qf3, the general rule of thumb is that you should try to force White to capture a Black Knight on d5 with a Knight or Bishop so that you wind up with pawns on d5/e5/f5. If you acquire that pawn phalanx in the center, then Black is usually better.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #21 - 02/21/11 at 02:31:14
Post Tools
fling wrote on 02/20/11 at 09:21:05:
sloughter wrote on 02/19/11 at 12:50:55:
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 17:23:42:
Jonathan Tait wrote on 02/14/11 at 16:26:00:
OTB play 4...Bc5 and watch your opponent's face fall Wink

... and hope that they don't have the "2 knights" DVD from Trent - dark clouds for Mr. Traxler there...


I have beaten Fritz 8 with White in the Traxler and got a completing winning endgame against Fritz 12. Here is the simplest cook of the Traxler:

4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Bxf7ch Kxf7 6.Bb3! (Bd5 is a red herring; Bb3 is just winning) 6...Rf8 (Qf8 is also +/- Nb4 7.c3 Nxb3 8.Qxc3 & Here Fritz plays Qg8. White can enter a slightly better endgame with 9.Qxg8 or stay in a highly favorable middle game with  9.Qc2) 7.d3 d6 8.Be3 Bg4 9.Nf3 Bxe3 (This just loses; Black cannot allow me to contest the f-file) 10.fxe3 Qd7 (You will note that Black cannot walk his King East) 11.Nbd2 (+-) Rae8 12.Qe2 Kd8 13.O-O-O Kc8 14.h3! Be6 15.g4! Kb8 16.Kb1! Bxb3 17.Nxb3 h6 18.Rdf1 g5?? (This is a horrible positional blunder) 19.Rf2 Re7 20.Rhf1 Ref7 21.Nh2! a5 22.Nd2 Qe6 (Trying for a cheap shot) 23.a3 Nd7 24.Rxf7 Rxf7 25.Rxf7 Qxf7 26.Qf3 Qg7 (Basically useless but Black has no moves) 27.Ndf1 (Heading for the f5 square) Nc5 28.Ng3 b6 29.Nh5 Qe7 30.Qf6 Qxf6 31.Nxf6 Ne7 32.Nf1 Kc8 33.Ng3 Nd7 34.Nxd7 Kxd7 35.Nf5 Ng8 & Black is in zugzwang. I created connected passed pawns on the Kingside and a passed pawn on the a-file but blew the ending and only drew.


But how can Black play 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7? Did I miss something?


It's a typo---Ke7 is the correct move. I try to edit before posting but missed that; I'll try to be more careful in the future.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #20 - 02/21/11 at 02:29:09
Post Tools
ArKheiN wrote on 02/20/11 at 12:15:21:
About Sloughter, we have played 5 games in the chess.com website where I won 5-0 as Black with Na5 against Qf3. Ok that doesn't mean Black is winning. But Black is at least equal, I am pretty sure about that.

MNb: some times ago we discussed about the Fritz-Ulvestad again http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1256554731/30

where I did refresh my previous thoughts, and nothing have changed for me since. We have to say that serious practice on the subject is needed, for example strong corr games. I think 10.0-0 exd4 11.Bc6 instead of 11.d3 is more precise (this is already what I have said in the past). And now after the forced 11..Rb8 12.d3, we have reached the same position as 10.0-0 Rb8 11.Bc6 exd4 12.d3 where we quickly looked at 12..Nf4 and 12..Qf5. 

Against 12..Nf4 there is 13.Na4! so the little conclusion seemed to be 12..Qf5 as one of the best try to get a playable game. Computer still prefer White (almost +/-) to it but I agree that in practice, Black may have chances against the king. Note that the Kd8 is not very happy too.

 
Point taken---the variation I'm playing against Fritz 12 is the critical line 8.Qf3 Be7! (ArKein--why not show the nubbies why don't you, why 9.Bxc6ch is a bad idea?) variation I'm trying now is the variation 8.Qf3 Be7 9.Bd3 O-O 10.Nc3 h6 11.Nge4 Nd5 12.Ng3 g6 (Played by Fritz 12 after several minutes of thought)13.Be4!with complications. This is geared towards a piece sacrifice where White winds up with three passed pawns for the piece and an unbalanced game. A major attribute of Be4 is that it allows d3 with a hit on the h6 pawn and avoids the crippling Nb4/Nxd3 with at least equality.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AlanG
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 159
Joined: 10/16/08
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #19 - 02/20/11 at 14:36:41
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 02/20/11 at 14:15:39:
It would be a very great service to everyone if you would put the first nine moves.  Having checked the link, I still can't figure out that you're talking about.

I believe it's this line:

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 b5 6.Bf1 Nd4 7.c3 Nxd5 8.cxd4 Qxg5 9.Bxb5+ Kd8
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #18 - 02/20/11 at 14:15:39
Post Tools
ArKheiN wrote on 02/20/11 at 12:15:21:

MNb: some times ago we discussed about the Fritz-Ulvestad again http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1256554731/30

where I did refresh my previous thoughts, and nothing have changed for me since. We have to say that serious practice on the subject is needed, for example strong corr games. I think 10.0-0 exd4 11.Bc6 instead of 11.d3 is more precise (this is already what I have said in the past). And now after the forced 11..Rb8 12.d3, we have reached the same position as 10.0-0 Rb8 11.Bc6 exd4 12.d3 where we quickly looked at 12..Nf4 and 12..Qf5. 

Against 12..Nf4 there is 13.Na4! so the little conclusion seemed to be 12..Qf5 as one of the best try to get a playable game. Computer still prefer White (almost +/-) to it but I agree that in practice, Black may have chances against the king. Note that the Kd8 is not very happy too.


It would be a very great service to everyone if you would put the first nine moves.  Having checked the link, I still can't figure out that you're talking about.

Personally I think that 5...Na5 is not only the best practical choice, but also a fully adequate rejoinder to 4.Ng5.  I would reject 5...Nxd5 not only on practical grounds, but also because I think that after 6.d4, Black is much worse.  This, notwithstanding sloughter's contrary opinion.  The Ulvestad is a great system for scholastic players and if I recall MNb's able analysis of it here correctly, leads with best play to a position where White has only a miniscule structural advantage.  I wasn't aware that 8.cxd4 was as strong as Arkhein says, so perhaps that's the death of the Ulvestad.

A great many words have been wasted in this forum about the Traxler.  To me it looks pretty bad after 5.Bxf7+ followed by 6.Bb3.  I like to get castled, you know?

A great coffeehouse move is 4...Nxe4?!, but like the Traxler, it fails to 5.Bxf7+.

But Black's lucky if White goes in for 4.Ng5 these days.  You always see 4.d3, after which you can take your pick between 4...Be7 and 4...Bc5 (4...d5 is not quite sound).  To me, 4...Bc5 seems much more ambitious.  So while learning the Two Knights is a great education, at higher levels, it turns out that the only real reason for playing it is to avoid the Evans Gambit and the 5.c3 Guioco (and to be able to play a timely ...Nf6 against the infrequently seen Scotch and Urusov gambits). 
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #17 - 02/20/11 at 14:06:21
Post Tools
micawber wrote on 02/19/11 at 17:46:06:
Moderators! Allert
I see sloughter is back on his old game.
If I am not mistaken he was banned from this forum after spamming a two-knights thread on Chesspub two years back.

My comments refer to this thread,
which actually had to be closed because it totally got out of hand
http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1230634273


If sloughter is banned, it's up to Tony to enforce it, so I suggest you message him.  I assume sloughter is not banned, since he is able to post.  If you have any complaints about his conduct recently, please message me about it.

Problematic posters like sloughter and Gambit are a great deal of trouble for moderators because they have to be watched so closely.  However I prefer to let such people participate so long as they do so responsibly (@sloughter: a word to the wise).
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ArKheiN
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 728
Location: Belgium
Joined: 03/30/05
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #16 - 02/20/11 at 12:15:21
Post Tools
About Sloughter, we have played 5 games in the chess.com website where I won 5-0 as Black with Na5 against Qf3. Ok that doesn't mean Black is winning. But Black is at least equal, I am pretty sure about that.

MNb: some times ago we discussed about the Fritz-Ulvestad again http://www.chesspub.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1256554731/30

where I did refresh my previous thoughts, and nothing have changed for me since. We have to say that serious practice on the subject is needed, for example strong corr games. I think 10.0-0 exd4 11.Bc6 instead of 11.d3 is more precise (this is already what I have said in the past). And now after the forced 11..Rb8 12.d3, we have reached the same position as 10.0-0 Rb8 11.Bc6 exd4 12.d3 where we quickly looked at 12..Nf4 and 12..Qf5. 

Against 12..Nf4 there is 13.Na4! so the little conclusion seemed to be 12..Qf5 as one of the best try to get a playable game. Computer still prefer White (almost +/-) to it but I agree that in practice, Black may have chances against the king. Note that the Kd8 is not very happy too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #15 - 02/20/11 at 09:21:05
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 02/19/11 at 12:50:55:
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 17:23:42:
Jonathan Tait wrote on 02/14/11 at 16:26:00:
OTB play 4...Bc5 and watch your opponent's face fall Wink

... and hope that they don't have the "2 knights" DVD from Trent - dark clouds for Mr. Traxler there...


I have beaten Fritz 8 with White in the Traxler and got a completing winning endgame against Fritz 12. Here is the simplest cook of the Traxler:

4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Bxf7ch Kxf7 6.Bb3! (Bd5 is a red herring; Bb3 is just winning) 6...Rf8 (Qf8 is also +/- Nb4 7.c3 Nxb3 8.Qxc3 & Here Fritz plays Qg8. White can enter a slightly better endgame with 9.Qxg8 or stay in a highly favorable middle game with  9.Qc2) 7.d3 d6 8.Be3 Bg4 9.Nf3 Bxe3 (This just loses; Black cannot allow me to contest the f-file) 10.fxe3 Qd7 (You will note that Black cannot walk his King East) 11.Nbd2 (+-) Rae8 12.Qe2 Kd8 13.O-O-O Kc8 14.h3! Be6 15.g4! Kb8 16.Kb1! Bxb3 17.Nxb3 h6 18.Rdf1 g5?? (This is a horrible positional blunder) 19.Rf2 Re7 20.Rhf1 Ref7 21.Nh2! a5 22.Nd2 Qe6 (Trying for a cheap shot) 23.a3 Nd7 24.Rxf7 Rxf7 25.Rxf7 Qxf7 26.Qf3 Qg7 (Basically useless but Black has no moves) 27.Ndf1 (Heading for the f5 square) Nc5 28.Ng3 b6 29.Nh5 Qe7 30.Qf6 Qxf6 31.Nxf6 Ne7 32.Nf1 Kc8 33.Ng3 Nd7 34.Nxd7 Kxd7 35.Nf5 Ng8 & Black is in zugzwang. I created connected passed pawns on the Kingside and a passed pawn on the a-file but blew the ending and only drew.


But how can Black play 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 Bc5 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7? Did I miss something?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #14 - 02/20/11 at 03:05:08
Post Tools
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 15:23:23:
GM Gustafsson is also not sure, if there is really equality after 4.Ng5 on his DVD


As far as the main line---the 5...Na5 is about equal to 5...Nxd5 theoretically, but unless you are a good defender you will get better practical results with 5...Na5. An unprepared Black player might try 6.Bb5ch c6 7.dxc6 Nxc6?? 8.Bc4! (The toughest move in chess to see is the retreat of the Bishop; GM Lev Alburt missed this when we analyzed the variation together; Fritz finds it in a split second). There is no defense to the threat of Nxf7 with a super charged Fried Liver.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #13 - 02/20/11 at 02:45:33
Post Tools
Matemax wrote on 02/14/11 at 15:23:23:
GM Gustafsson is also not sure, if there is really equality after 4.Ng5 on his DVD


Theoretically sound and practically sound are totally different. Black gets excellent play against a poorly prepared player of the White pieces, but must not fall prey to inadequate preparation when playing the variation. For instance if you play 5...Na5 you must not play the tempting 11...Bxg2 when White is clearly better e.g. 8.Qf3 cxb5 9.Qxa8 Qe7 10.Qf3 Bb7 11.Qe2 Bxg2? 12.Qxe5ch! (White can ignore the threat of O-O/Re8; it is too slow) Be7 14.d3 O-O 15.Nc3 Bd6 16.Qxb5 Qxb5 17.Nxb5 Bxh2 18.Rf1 h6 19.Bd2! a6 20.Nd4 Nc6 21.Ngf3 +-
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: What to do against 4.Ng5 in the two knights?
Reply #12 - 02/20/11 at 02:22:50
Post Tools
If you want a "trappy" variation of the TKD where you will get good tactical/practical play, then just play in response to 5...Na5 6.Bb5ch c6 7.bxc6 dxc6 8.Qf3 cxb5?! Theoretically not sound but an excellent practical choice. It took me 30 moves to consolidate my advantage against Fritz 12. All it takes is for White to make even one small mistake and Black gets excellent play. In this variation for example, if White tries to hold the g2 pawn with Qh3 after Bb7, the Queen is a target on h3 and Black is better. If White plays the logical 14.Nf3, then Black is at least equal. If White misses 13.c3 Black is close to winning.

Here is a complex maneuvering game against Fritz 12 which eventually cracked under the pressure.

8.Qf3 cxb5 9.Qxa8 Qd7 10.Qf3 Be7 11.O-O Bb7 12.Qe2 Nc6 13.c3 h6 14.Nh3! a6 15.f3 O-O 16.Nf2 Nd5 17.d3 Re8 18.Qd1 Bc5 19.Kh1 Rd8 20.Qc2 Rc8 21.Qe2 f6 22.Ne4 Be7 23.Rd1 f5 24.Nf2 b4 25.a3 bxc3 26.bxc3 Bc5 27.Ra2 Qf7 28.Rc2 Re8 29.Re1 Rb8 30.Rb2 Qf6 31.Qe2 Qe7 32.d4! exd4 33.Qxe7 & Black will pick up a center pawn but White will pick up the a-pawn with a clear advantage.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo