Before the trolls take over (my own fault, I guess), I'll give my [intended] solution. The members have done a fairly good job, correctly identifying Paul Morphy as the "winner". A bit surprising that Napoleon Bonaparte got more votes. The so-called "Napoleon Complex" must still resonate with many. It seems that (see Wikipedia & elsewhere) it was part of the British propaganda that Napoleon was a small man.
Napoleon had about the same height as
Karpov: 1.70m, or five feet seven inches. The earlier confusion (French "feet" differered from the English; the autopsy was done by a French doctor, on English territory) was settled when his body was exhumed. The dead Kaiser was measured as 1.68m, and so the younger Napoleon must have been as tall as Karpov. With 1.70 he was just average for his time. Contemporary sources are saying that he was worried more about his weight than about height.
Paul Morphy was shorter.
The American Phrenological Journal and Repository of Science 1859 gives the following as part of a longer article:
Quote:His head measures twenty two and three quarter inches in circumference, his height is about five feet six inches, and his weight, as he informed us, is only one hundred and twelve pounds. If his head were as much too large for his body as at present, and he weighed one hundred and seventy-five pounds, the head would measure as large as Daniel Webster's, which was about twenty-four and a half inches.
(Height highlighted by me in bold type; Daniel Webster was an American politician and Foreign Minister.)
So it seems sure that Morphy was somewhat shorter than the other two; those feet and inches translate to
1.67 or
1.68m. According to Edge, Paul Morphy was even 5 cm shorter. But I am inclined to trust the "scientists" more. Whatever you think about phrenology, they were used to measure bodies.