BPaulsen wrote on 08/31/11 at 00:52:11:
Post was directed at Nikita76, not you.
I know; I still took the liberty to answer. That's what a forum is for.
BPaulsen wrote on 08/31/11 at 00:52:11:
The problem with 3. Nc3 Nf6 is winning chances, not so much anything particularly dangerous white has. By the time black solves his problems there is typically very little left to play for in the critical variations.
Even though one game began with 4.e5 and another with 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e5 Nfd7 6.Bxe7 I lost twice in similar ways: I played a la the Sicilian with ..a6 and b5, White castled short, I had equalized, thought I could initiate more counterplay on the Queenside and got mated. That was very depressing.
At the other hand in my last four games with the Winawer I equalized, did not get too much counterplay but did not get mated either.
Now I wonder what this tells about my (lacking) chess skills, because I realize very well this is more or less contrary to the general view on 3...Nf6 and 3...Bb4. So this makes me quite insecure. Do I understand zilch about the French? But why do I have such fine results against the Tarrasch and the Advance then? If it weren't for this (and because I want to play 1.d4 e6) I would have given up the French long ago.
At least I understand that I'm not a typical Frenchie, whatever that may mean.
Note: I do know now what I did wrong in those two 3...Nf6 games. That doesn't solve the mystery though: I am tempted to return to 3...Nf6
in order to create more winning chances as Black! Note 2: my memory deceives me for the zillionth time. I actually lost three games with 3...Nf6. In an older one White castled Queenside and still my counterplay came too late.