Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit (Read 192132 times)
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #26 - 01/21/12 at 09:54:26
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 01/21/12 at 08:58:28:
derdudea wrote on 01/21/12 at 08:10:37:
1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Bg4 3.Bg2 Nd7 looks like a decent, non-transposing option. Kramnik, Shirov and Scherbakov (!) used to play it some years ago and some other strong players (Rublevski, Wang Hao) still play it.

I´m playing Scherbakovs repertoire for years (and very succesfully in correspondence chess) but I´m not an expert on this line, since I play the French and therefore will be happy with 1.Nf3 e6 2.e4. If White plays 2.g3 d5 3.Nf3 dxc4 4.Qa4 is acceptable and will not transpose to Catalan mainlines.

Derudea, I'm not following your last line. When does White play c4, on move 1?

Presumably on move three...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #25 - 01/21/12 at 08:58:28
Post Tools
derdudea wrote on 01/21/12 at 08:10:37:
1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Bg4 3.Bg2 Nd7 looks like a decent, non-transposing option. Kramnik, Shirov and Scherbakov (!) used to play it some years ago and some other strong players (Rublevski, Wang Hao) still play it.

I´m playing Scherbakovs repertoire for years (and very succesfully in correspondence chess) but I´m not an expert on this line, since I play the French and therefore will be happy with 1.Nf3 e6 2.e4. If White plays 2.g3 d5 3.Nf3 dxc4 4.Qa4 is acceptable and will not transpose to Catalan mainlines.

Derudea, I'm not following your last line. When does White play c4, on move 1?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
derdudea
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 176
Location: Germany
Joined: 10/03/08
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #24 - 01/21/12 at 08:10:37
Post Tools
1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Bg4 3.Bg2 Nd7 looks like a decent, non-transposing option. Kramnik, Shirov and Scherbakov (!) used to play it some years ago and some other strong players (Rublevski, Wang Hao) still play it.

I´m playing Scherbakovs repertoire for years (and very succesfully in correspondence chess) but I´m not an expert on this line, since I play the French and therefore will be happy with 1.Nf3 e6 2.e4. If White plays 2.g3 d5 3.Nf3 dxc4 4.Qa4 is acceptable and will not transpose to Catalan mainlines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Seth_Xoma
God Member
*****
Offline


FM with 2 IM Norms - (2381)

Posts: 558
Location: Lansing
Joined: 11/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #23 - 01/21/12 at 02:31:52
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 01/08/12 at 13:33:08:
It may be worth noting that Shulman, a major Triangle practitioner, only plays it after 3.Nc3. If 3.Nf3, he plays 3...Nf6, allowing the Catalan, and if then 4.Nc3, he plays 4...dxc4, which usually turns into a Vienna.

Secondly, if anyone plans to use the Triangle move order to avoid the Catalan, after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.g3, he has to play 4...dxc4. Because 4...f5 becomes the main line  of  Stonewall, and if he allows that, he might just as well play the Stonewall in the first place and forget the Triangle. Personally I think that most Catalan players would be happy to see 4...dxc4. I faced it as White once and won fairly easily from a position that my books claimed was equal.


What if White enters the Catalan from a 1.Nf3 move order and Black doesn't want to play against 1...f5 2.d3?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #22 - 01/21/12 at 02:05:48
Post Tools
Fllg wrote on 01/20/12 at 16:39:35:
It seems Scherbakov does indeed suggest a transposition to a Stonewall in some lines after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 without 4.Nc3 as can be seen in the video introduction to the book: http://www.everymanchess.com/chess/books/The_Triangle_System%3A_Noteboom%2C_Mars...

4.g3 isn´t mentioned specifically but I expect coverage in the last chapter "White doesn´t protect c4".



Well yes, but I think that if you're going to use the Triangle as something more than a way of reaching a Meran, you'll have to react to 3.Nc3 c6 4.e3 with 4...Bd6 and next 5...f5.  4...Bd6 is an important finesse, btw, since 4...f5 runs into 5.g4. Black waits for White's next move, and 5.Bd3 f5 6.g4 is nothing much.

4...Nf6 is there, but if you play that, all your Noteboom preparation is just to support a certain move-order preferance.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ghenghisclown
God Member
*****
Offline


Pedicare Vestri Latin

Posts: 1022
Location: HollyWeird
Joined: 07/19/06
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #21 - 01/20/12 at 19:48:22
Post Tools
  

"Experience is a dim lamp, which only lights the one who bears it."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #20 - 01/20/12 at 16:39:35
Post Tools
It seems Scherbakov does indeed suggest a transposition to a Stonewall in some lines after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 without 4.Nc3 as can be seen in the video introduction to the book: http://www.everymanchess.com/chess/books/The_Triangle_System%3A_Noteboom%2C_Mars...

4.g3 isn´t mentioned specifically but I expect coverage in the last chapter "White doesn´t protect c4".

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #19 - 01/20/12 at 13:01:07
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 01/08/12 at 13:33:08:


Secondly, if anyone plans to use the Triangle move order to avoid the Catalan, after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.g3, he has to play 4...dxc4. Because 4...f5 becomes the main line  of  Stonewall, and if he allows that, he might just as well play the Stonewall in the first place and forget the Triangle. Personally I think that most Catalan players would be happy to see 4...dxc4. I faced it as White once and won fairly easily from a position that my books claimed was equal.


Well, what's the harm in seeing if White will play an e3-setup before going Stonewall? Besides, the Stonewall variation is probably the Catalan bishop's worst enemy - while all those different variations of taking on c4 is exactly what Bg2 wants...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
najdorfslayer
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 156
Joined: 05/08/09
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #18 - 01/08/12 at 16:49:26
Post Tools
I sort of agree with Markovich

I would probably be quite happy playing 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 as after 4.Nf3 you would get the Noteboom 4.e4 the Marshall Gambit or 4.cxd5 a pretty tame Exchange QGD when the Black bishop can come to f5. 

However after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 I am not too happy playing 3...c6 as it allows like lots of Anti-Triangle lines such as:

a) 4.Qc2 when you get positions similar to a QGD. 
b) 4.g3 when you have positions similar to a Closed Catalan.
c) 4.e3 (very popular in my league!) when you can follow up with the Queen's Knight to d2 and follow Avrukh's repertiore in GM1.
d) 4.Bg5 when again Black can play 4...Nf6 with positions similar to that of a QGD/Semi-Slav or 4...Be7 which for me looks pretty dull!

Personally I quite like playing 3...c6 against 3.Nc3 and 3...c5 against 3.Nf3. 
But that means learning two defences, and one could argue why not play 3...c5 against both 3.Nc3 & 3.Nf3.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #17 - 01/08/12 at 13:33:08
Post Tools
It may be worth noting that Shulman, a major Triangle practitioner, only plays it after 3.Nc3. If 3.Nf3, he plays 3...Nf6, allowing the Catalan, and if then 4.Nc3, he plays 4...dxc4, which usually turns into a Vienna.

Secondly, if anyone plans to use the Triangle move order to avoid the Catalan, after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 c6 4.g3, he has to play 4...dxc4. Because 4...f5 becomes the main line  of  Stonewall, and if he allows that, he might just as well play the Stonewall in the first place and forget the Triangle. Personally I think that most Catalan players would be happy to see 4...dxc4. I faced it as White once and won fairly easily from a position that my books claimed was equal.

More peaceable Catalan players will just play 4.Qc2 instead of 4.g3, and get pretty much the game they want.
« Last Edit: 01/21/12 at 01:57:35 by Markovich »  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gramsci
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 210
Joined: 11/11/09
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #16 - 01/07/12 at 20:38:32
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 01/07/12 at 20:27:42:
gramsci wrote on 01/07/12 at 07:50:06:
to allow the Slav Exchange and the Botwinnik/Moscow/Anti-Moscow

How does Black allow the (Anti-)Moscow if he/she only plays ...Nf6 after White's e2-e3? As far as I understand that's the whole point of the Noteboom.

that's my idea: to avoid the (Anti-)Moscow and the Slav Exchange playing the Noteboom, the Meran Semi-Slav after e3, the Catalan, the Marshall Gambit and a good vesion or the QGD Exchange.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10778
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #15 - 01/07/12 at 20:27:42
Post Tools
gramsci wrote on 01/07/12 at 07:50:06:
to allow the Slav Exchange and the Botwinnik/Moscow/Anti-Moscow

How does Black allow the (Anti-)Moscow if he/she only plays ...Nf6 after White's e2-e3? As far as I understand that's the whole point of the Noteboom.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #14 - 01/07/12 at 18:01:25
Post Tools
Oh yes very fine, but its still not trivial to do much if whites organise and after a draw. Which is a very silly thing to be scared of really Smiley (but is the only reason to be truly perturbed by the Slav exchange.).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jonathan Tait
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 617
Location: Nottingham
Joined: 07/11/06
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #13 - 01/07/12 at 16:38:41
Post Tools
gramsci wrote on 01/06/12 at 15:05:04:
So what's the meaning of the title "(...) and other Semi-Slav Triangle lines"?


Anti-Noteboom lines like 4 Qc2, 4 Qb3, 4 Nbd2 are also Semi-Slavs if Black plays ...Nf6. Not the most testing lines maybe, but Black still has to know what to do.
  

blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Scherbakov Book on Noteboom,Marshall Gambit
Reply #12 - 01/07/12 at 16:06:37
Post Tools
saubhikr wrote on 01/07/12 at 15:33:20:
fling wrote on 01/07/12 at 11:14:17:
Yeah, I'd be more afraid of the QGD exchange rather than the Slav exchange. The QGD seems to give White more chances for an edge, and also to play for a draw if suitable. But I agree, varying move orders is a good idea. Also, it is of course good and fun to play different pawn structures.


That is true in proper QGD exchange where black plays Nf6 and then white (with Nc3) exchanges on d5 and then plays Bg5. Here black has not played Nf6 and had an useful c6 move supporting d5 which allows him to play Bf5 faster. Resulting positions are unbalanced enought to give enough winning chances. More than that of exchange slav.


True, my mistake. The plan ...c6 and ...Bf5 is fine for Black.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo