BobbyDigital80 wrote on 08/24/18 at 00:16:47:
I would play the 6...Bb7 Archangel if it weren’t for 7.d3. That kills all the fun out of the opening. If this line were good for Black, then the line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5.d3 b5 6.Bb3 Bb7 would be played. And maybe even 5.0-0 Be7 6.d3 b5 7.Bb3 Bb7.
I understand your argument. I too thought the
answer to ...Bb7 was d3.
There is a new Ebook at ForwardChess:
The Original Arkhangelsk by Tibor Karoly, Dec 16, 2025
He includes a sample game which starts:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3 Bb7 7. d3 Bd6!?
Frankly, the bishop looks ugly to me on d6. However in subsequent play black plays ...0-0 ...h6 ...Re8 and ...Bf8. Black gets the same positioning of pieces as in the Zaitsev.
I don't know how much the author relies on ...Bd6 as one of his sample games has black playing ...Bc5 instead.
The author explains his book better than I can. However, I'll mention my thoughts as they are the only ones I have. After ...Bb7 and d3, the bishop "bites on granite." ok. On the other hand, d3 never struck me as being as good as d4. Yet the chess world has come to accept d3 in the Ruy Lopez and Italian game.
Perhaps ...Bd6-f8 adds to the discussion. The bishop initially supports the e-pawn then proceeds as in the Zaitsev and Breyer variations. On d6, the bishop is less vulnerable to d4 than would be the case if it were on c5.
Time and practice will tell. For the moment, anyone who liked the original Archangel should be interested in this Ebook.