(UTC)
  ChessPub Forum › General › General Chess › Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
(Moderators: proustiskeen, trw, RoleyPoley)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-( (Read 15823 times)
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #26 - 04/29/12 at 22:04:42
Post Tools
I think the difference with Sokolov's case and mine is that I regularly had lost positions before move 20 with 1. e4 Smiley
  
Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1839
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #25 - 04/29/12 at 08:47:54
Post Tools
Its actually possilbe to lose as white with 1 d4 under 20 moves even for GMs! GM Sokolov played a risky line vs GM Aronian in Nimzo Indian game with Qc2 and was forced to resign at move 19! And Sokolov is leeding white player in both Qc2 and e3 Nimzo Indian! The point is that its risky to play sharp mainlines if one does not know or has forgotten theory!
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #24 - 04/29/12 at 00:11:14
Post Tools
I switched from 1. d4 from 1. e4 when I spent more than one hour on the first 15 moves of a 6. Bg5 Najdorf whilst playing against an IM, and almost lost on time.

And yes, the Petroff is annoying to play against. The Berlin Wall is probably even more annoying to play against. And then I had a lost position around move 15 against Magesh Panchanathan when I played against the Chigorin Spanish.

So one of the reasons I never play 1. e4 again is that I usually do not have lost positions within the first 20 moves after 1. d4.
  
Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10778
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #23 - 04/28/12 at 16:44:19
Post Tools
Since I switched from 1.e4 to 1.d4 my games have become significantly sharper and I myself have become much happier. I will only consider to take up 1.e4 again if I know what to do against the dreaded Russian/Petrov Defence. No, 5.Nc3 isn't very attractive either. Of course I might change my mind if confronted with fascinating lines.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bragesjo
God Member
*****
Offline


CCE at ICCF 2021 and CCM
at ICCF 2023

Posts: 1839
Location: Eskilstuna
Joined: 06/30/06
Gender: Male
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #22 - 04/28/12 at 15:54:52
Post Tools
About sharpness in 1 e4 vs e d4, I agree that after 1 e4 the play becomces more direct after 1 d4. But about sharpness, there are ultra sharp lines even in solid openings like Nimzo Indian. It depends on what white plays and on blacks reply to it etc.  Botvinnik Semi Slav is a so sharp opening that not even computers have a idea of how to evalute the positions! Dutch can also leeds to extremly sharp play. I also think that Topalov once said something like "1 d4 leeds to more romantic play than 1 e4 these days".
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #21 - 04/28/12 at 05:29:44
Post Tools
Probably, but when I played 1. e4 I played 3. Nd2 against the Caro-Kann whilst never knowing why.
  
Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #20 - 04/28/12 at 03:10:52
Post Tools
What MarkG said is what I always thought too.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MarkG
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 103
Joined: 01/30/08
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #19 - 04/28/12 at 02:22:39
Post Tools
Gilchrist is a legend wrote on 04/27/12 at 20:13:43:
I forgot exactly why 3. Nd2 is played instead of 3. Nc3, but I was taught that it was because of 3. Nc3 b5 4. exd5 b4, but I am not sure this is a major reason. That line is annoying to play against in blitz, though.


Didn't Tal produce a famous crush against that line? It is in his book of best games (greatest chess book ever?)  I don't have it to hand right now but I recall he simply played 4.a3 when his opponent could think of nothing better than 4...dxe4 5.Nxe4 when black would have been much better off if he could put the a and b pawns back on their original squares.

I thought the reason to prefer 3.Nd2 in the Caro was that it was more flexible if black avoided 3...dxe4. Specifically, if black tries to switch to a Gurgenidze formation with 3...g6 then white still has the option of reinforcing his center with c3. Also, he can consider arranging his knights with Ne2 and Ndf3.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #18 - 04/27/12 at 20:13:43
Post Tools
I forgot exactly why 3. Nd2 is played instead of 3. Nc3, but I was taught that it was because of 3. Nc3 b5 4. exd5 b4, but I am not sure this is a major reason. That line is annoying to play against in blitz, though.

But there have been very high-level repertoire books for 1. d4, 1. c4, or 1. Nf3, most based on main lines and theoretical variations: Avrukh, Schandorff, Marin, Ippolito/Hilton, Kaufman, etc. Maybe since 1. d4 (Closed games) and 1. c4/Nf3 (Flank games) are less forcing generally than 1. e4? Apart from the Botvinnik Semi-Slav and King's Indian Mar Del Plata, is really 1. d4/1. c4/1. Nf3 comparable to 1. e4 in sharpness?
  
Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wolfsblut
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 111
Joined: 06/02/06
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #17 - 04/27/12 at 19:32:11
Post Tools
Hi,

I`m sure that it will be 3.Nd2 against both the French and the Caro! For sure!
3.e5 against the Caro and 3.Nc3 against the French are the moves for Aagaard in his GM-Rep.  Wink

greetings

wolfsblut
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby
Senior Member
****
Offline


The night is dark and
full of terrors.

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/09/12
Gender: Female
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #16 - 04/27/12 at 14:40:49
Post Tools
gwnn wrote on 04/27/12 at 14:24:34:
Fllg wrote on 04/27/12 at 12:34:43:
Markovich wrote on 04/27/12 at 11:51:41:
I would like to see a strong partisan of the white pieces write about 3.Nc3!.


This will most likely be the choice of Jacob Aagaard in his forthcoming GM Repertoire books.

As for the GM Guides by John Shaw about 1.e4 I don´t think he will recommend the Advance vs. French but instead 3.Nd2 vs. both the French and the Caro-Kann.


Yes, to clarify: all that John Shaw revealed was that he will meet both defences with the same (second and) third move. It is safe to say that it is d4 and either e5 or Nd2.



Does not 3. Nc3 also qualify as a candidate move??
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gwnn
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 472
Joined: 03/21/11
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #15 - 04/27/12 at 14:24:34
Post Tools
Fllg wrote on 04/27/12 at 12:34:43:
Markovich wrote on 04/27/12 at 11:51:41:
I would like to see a strong partisan of the white pieces write about 3.Nc3!.


This will most likely be the choice of Jacob Aagaard in his forthcoming GM Repertoire books.

As for the GM Guides by John Shaw about 1.e4 I don´t think he will recommend the Advance vs. French but instead 3.Nd2 vs. both the French and the Caro-Kann.


Yes, to clarify: all that John Shaw revealed was that he will meet both defences with the same (second and) third move. It is safe to say that it is d4 and either e5 or Nd2.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #14 - 04/27/12 at 12:34:43
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 04/27/12 at 11:51:41:
I would like to see a strong partisan of the white pieces write about 3.Nc3!.


This will most likely be the choice of Jacob Aagaard in his forthcoming GM Repertoire books.

As for the GM Guides by John Shaw about 1.e4 I don´t think he will recommend the Advance vs. French but instead 3.Nd2 vs. both the French and the Caro-Kann.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #13 - 04/27/12 at 11:51:41
Post Tools
Gilchrist is a legend wrote on 04/27/12 at 07:20:49:
I wonder how much work it would require to write 1. e4 repertoire, with one volume on Sicilians:

Najdorf: 6. Bg5
Kan: 5. Nc3 with 7. Qg4
Sveshnikov: 9. Nd5 Be7 10. Bxf6 Bxf6 11. c3
Taimanov: 6. Be2
Classical: 6. Bg5
Scheveningen: Keres
Dragon: Yugoslav
Accelerated Dragon: Maróczy Bind
Four Knights: 7. a3



Good and sharp.  I would like to have that book in my hand.  I might like to see sharper play in a few cases, though.

@gwnn:  Advance French?  How wearisome.  I would like to see a strong partisan of the white pieces write about 3.Nc3!.
  
The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
battleangel
Ex Member
*
Re: Well 1.d4 players are happy but 1.e4 players :-(
Reply #12 - 04/27/12 at 11:47:10
Post Tools
I can recommend the 2 Sam Collin's repertoires,
one is book, the other one dvd
they differ that one has Scotch, French Advance and the other has Italian and French Nd2, I recommend the later,
but it's only a DVD so, it's not really the same as a book.
If you want a middle ranged opening with white with not too much theory I would go for this kind of repertoire.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge