Smyslov_Fan wrote on 06/14/12 at 15:40:02:
The Slav does involve a tremendous amount of theory. I guess I was lucky in that I started playing it seriously just a couple years before it became high fashion among the GM elites so I was able to keep up with the theory in my pet lines.
As White, most GMs think 1d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 dc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.Ne5 is the sharpest and best way to play the mainline Slav
That means that you will probably have to play 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 lines against the Semi-Slav and other Queen's Gambit lines. (I stand firmly on the side that the Slav and Semi-Slav are part of the Queen's Gambit discussion from another thread.)
Against 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 a6, the Chebanenko, you have a wider choice. For me, the two main continuations are 5.c5 and 5.a4 e6 6.Bg5.
You'll have to follow the games of the big boys to keep up in all of these lines. But since that's one of the joys of chess rather than a chore, I don't see that as a negative at all.
If you want to play main lines, you will have to study chess. If you want to succeed in the long run, you will pretty much have to play main lines. So, bite the bullet and enjoy!
Thanks for this Smyslov-fan. Wasn't Smyslov a great payer indeed.
I've already done some serious work on the Semi-Slav and go for 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bf6: Qf6: 7.Qc2 with e4.
Against the a6 Slav I go for 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 a6 5.Bg5!? Ne4 6.Bf4 Nc3: 7.bc3: dc4: 8.e3 b5 9.Ne5!? a razor sharp interesting sideline.
But against the Slav accepted I'm a bit at a loss. After 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 dc4 5.a4 Bf5 I have been playing 6.Nh4 for a long time but I don't like it any more in particular after 6. ... Bg4.
I looked at 6.Ne5 but black has several equalizing lines there by the looks of it starting with Pert's 6. ... Nbd7 7.Nc4: Nb6!? The piece sac after 6. ... e6 7.f3 Bb4 8.e4 also seems to lead to equality nowadays?
Can you guys recommend a good recent book for white about the Slav?