Bibs wrote on 03/13/15 at 11:08:21:
Not impressed? Care to share specifics of your concerns...?
Bibs wrote on 03/13/15 at 11:08:21:
Not impressed? Care to share specifics of your concerns...?
Well 3 major chapters on the Main line. He gives lots of data on ...a5 saying, he doesn't play it any more because it's basically busted.
He then gives another major chapter on ...Qe8 saying that he doesn't rate it and that he has a 0/4 score with it.
He then gives a chapter on ...Nc6 saying it's dubious but a good surprise weapon.
All that I could possibly t
live with but does not inspire me to take up the Dutch.
Also the book is very thick. But most of it is not analysis but overloaded with needless diagrams. Analysis not so deep.
I need to read it a bit more and I may change my mind, it's just personal taste but compared to say a Quality Chess book it doesn't cut it.
I am sure others may like it. Me personally didn't
This pretty well sums it up. It's nowhere near as comprehensive as Tony's Killer Sicilian book and its surprising its in the same series. It's also not as good as his book on the french.
I found it odd that so much of the book is given over to lines that he thinks are dubious or busted. Its not even just the mainlines but also the 2. bg5 line where he gives an early Rh7.
Still after all that criticism i enjoyed reading it (i'm a fairly weak player) and maybe the classical dutch is in relatively poor shape and he is just being fair in his assessment..