Hello there.
I have been going through The Safest Grunfeld by Delchev and Agrest and I think it really is a fantastic book so far. I have been typing it in, engine-checking and coming up with improvements. Most of the improvements so far have been minor, but I think I have actually run into a problem which ruins the whole line for me. I personally have that you prove me wrong.
The line that I speak of is: 1.d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Bc4 c5 8.Ne2 0-0 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Be3 Qc7 11. Rc1 Rd8 12. Bf4 Qd7 13.dxc5 Qe8 and now the move is 14.Qc2.
This line is basically passed off in 'The Safest Grunfeld' and 'Chess Developments: The Grunfeld' as harmless, but I think it is pretty killer actually. Both books missed a simple idea and gave the line as 14...Bd7 15. Rfd1 Rac8 with good play based on ...Na5.
To be completely honest, the more and more I analyse the more hope I lose. I also analysed earlier deviations, such as 12...Be5, which is a little better but still not very good. Also please note that this is just a stub of my analysis - a condensed version.
So, is it just me or will I have to switch systems? I hope you prove me wrong, but I am pretty sure this analysis is accurate. Any improvements for Black are greatly appreciated
Thanks.