Quote: 2.c3 Nf6! Is well known and I found no way
Please excuse a novice question, for my enlightenment only:
Are you saying that if white enters the Alapin black can still compel white instead to play the Najdorf? Here are 2 other brief, partial quotes (with my emphasis) from your 1st post:
1.
Quote:I found no way/advantage against it.
2.
Quote: Now I tried different ways to avoid the Najdorf…
So, are you saying the Alapin offers no *advantage* ? Or that black can *compel* the Najdorf, even if white tries to enter the Alapin? Again, no 'dis to you. Just hungry for knowledge. If my questions are not clear I can offer this quote from Sveshnikov's own recent book, "Sveshnikov vs. the Anti-Sicilians" pg.8 ;
Quote:E) 2.c3. This solid move is the second or third strongest after 2 .Nf3 . I myself have
played this regularly since the mid- l970s and recently produced a substantial book
on it. Of course, there is not much sense in repeating myself, but so the reader can
get a complete repertoire against all White's ways of avoiding the main lines, in this
book I present a relatively recent and quite good new continuation for Black.
I suggest the most solid plan 2 ... Nf6!, which gives Black equal play. Admittedly,
he needs to know quite a lot, and I have no desire to copy out my earlier book, so I
have limited myself to the most important games and variations. The critical position
arises after 3.e5 Nd5 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nf3 4Jc6 6.cxd4 d6 7.Bc4.{also in the same paragraph,..}
In the earlier book, I analyzed 7 . . . Nb6 ! , which is the strongest move, requiring
deep knowledge from both players. In this new work, I recommend the more forcing
7. ..dxe5 ! ? , where Black also gradually equalizes.
So, he seems to say black can equalize after 2.c3, but not that there is "advantage" for black, or that he can still compel the Najdorf regardless.
And BTW, if I have made a colossal novice mistake, my apologies in advance.