Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) This is an odd one. (Read 12978 times)
H-HH
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 95
Location: Brasil
Joined: 03/18/06
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #15 - 05/20/06 at 10:51:31
Post Tools
"The point of 1.d4 e6 is usually to avoid the Trompowsky whilst allowing Black to aim for his favourite Nimzo-Indian or Modern Benoni."
i'm happy because i played 1..e6 against a tromp player and manage to enter a nimzo so your point makes sense Smiley
  

French defence forever, Fide 2035.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1947
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #14 - 05/30/05 at 17:52:25
Post Tools
I see what you mean about the F-B, Paul -- but from where I sit at the chessboard (i.e. on a lower board than you!) things are perhaps a bit different. If I were entering a F-B it'd be via 1 e4 e6 2 d4 c5, and in my circles 2 d4 is much the commonest. As an Owen's player I'd be happy to play 3 ...b6 if White avoids 3 d5, and if I were scheming say a Taimanov, Kan or Scheveningen Sicilian I might be happy to have avoided lines like 2 Nc3 (and regular 2 c3 lines, though here I admit I'd probably choose 2 ...b6 anyway!).

What I'd love to see is a detailed diagnosis of the F-B itself, though this is probably not the forum for that. I haven't yet tried it in a serious game, but I've found in casual games that it has considerable surprise value, which doesn't count for nothing ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Cumbers
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 175
Location: Grantham
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #13 - 05/30/05 at 14:18:36
Post Tools
Quote:
I am one of those Dutch players, who prefer 1.d4 e6. On 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 I came to about the same conclusions as Paul Cumbers. But I had one question: what if White does not play e4? Say 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Bg5 and what are Black's options?

I probably overreacted slightly in my previous post about the importance of 2.Nc3. I forgot that one of the main objectives of the Veresov is to play e4, otherwise the knight on c3 looks misplaced and merely hinders White's c-pawn. Hence, it looks artificial for White to avoid transposition into a French if Black plays an early ...e6. I was worried that 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Bg5 might be a bit dull for Black, but I've realised that sometimes you just have to be patient. 4...Be7! is a sensible reply. If White doesn't play for e4, Black has an easy game with ...0-0, ...c5, etc.. But 5.Qd3 0-0 6.e4? dxe4 7.Nxe4 Nxe4 8.Bxe7 Qxe7 9.Qxe4 Qb4+ is no good for White, so the only consistent follow-up is 5.Bxf6 Bxf6 6.e4. Now 6...0-0 7.Bd3 c5 8.e5 Be7 gives Black a decent French-type set-up (with two bishops for the future).

I notice that Nigel Davies' recent book on the Veresov has a section on 1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 e6 (transposing to the above line). I wonder what he recommends for White here... I should get the book really! Also, does he mention 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 at all (including 2...Bb4!?)?

Some further thoughts on the Franco-Benoni:
I've never really been attracted to this Opening for the simple reason that it just seems too easy for White to refuse to enter the line. After 1.d4 e6, most White players continue naturally with 2.c4 or 2.Nf3 (partly because they think Black is itching for a French with 2.e4 d5, and many 1.d4 players wouldn't want to transpose to a 1.e4 Opening). Alternatively, after 1.e4 e6, you might have to face anti-French ideas like 2.d3, 2.Nc3, or 2.Nf3 (which might turn out to be not so anti-French after all, e.g. 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4!). And if you do get as far as 2.d4 c5, there's a good chance that White would have been ready to play an Open Sicilian or a c3-Sicilian anyway (two of the most popular responses to 1...c5), in which case he'll happily play 3.Nf3 or 3.c3. The upshot is that it'll probably be quite a rare occurence that you actually get 1.d4/e4 e6 2.e4/d4 c5 3.d5!. It just seems like a tricky guessing game to me, or a nasty minefield, depending on your point of view! Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1947
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #12 - 05/30/05 at 03:44:54
Post Tools
Interesting thoughts, Paul -- thanks.

I guess Black might want to enter an Owen's via this unusual move order, and/or avoid a Sicilian when one seemed to beckon, if and only if he saw himself as specialising in the Franco-Benoni, really wished to reach that as Black and saw the other lines as subsidiary. Which brings us back to the question that you raise, namely, can the F-B be any good when it's so rarely played? I suppose one might ask the same question of the Owen's, but then, comparatively rare though it is too, it has at least achieved a mini-vogue which the F-B hasn't! Can a less common opening turn out actually to be perfectly good? As a Nimzowitsch Defence (or more properly Kennedy Defence: 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5) player I'd argue that it can, but obviously it's by analysis that any line finally stands or falls. Anyone else got any views/analysis on the Franco-Benoni? -- my feeling is that, unless the GMs really know it to be bad, theory on it is in a rather undeveloped state.

I think 3 c3 a6 4 Nf3 b5!? is interesting and it seems to score OK. Similarly 3 Nf3 a6 4 Nc3 b5!? as you suggest. Both these lines seem to be played by some surprisingly strong players, and I was surprised to find the latter so often being reached by 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 a6, which I'd always thought dubious because of 3 c4! ...!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Cumbers
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 175
Location: Grantham
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #11 - 05/24/05 at 17:35:27
Post Tools
Quote:
Is it clear that non-Sicilian options for Black after 3 c3 and 3 Nf3 are inferior? This might depend on what you think of Owen's Defence, of course, and I'd like to ask you, Paul, why you think the Owen's isn't so great (it's discussed/defended on various threads on the 1 e4 ... forum, esp. the one started by MarkPharoah ...).

Michael - I must apologise for jumping to conclusions about the Owen's! I'm ashamed to say my comments were based more on ignorance than anything else. Embarrassed After scanning through some of the material on this site, it appears that it's reputation as a second-rate Defence could be undeserved. Even so, if Black wanted an Owen's [after 1.d4 e6 2.e4], he'd probably play 2...b6 straight away rather than waiting for 2...c5 3.c3/Nf3 b6. Or better still, 1...b6!

Quote:
But besides recourse to a possible Owen's (can or should White avoid this?) after 3 c3 b6 or 3 Nf3 b6, there are other choices for Black -- offbeat-looking admittedly, but are they clearly bad? How about:

3 c3 a6!? (4 Nf3 b5 or ...d5)?

3 Nf3 a6!? 4 d5 (or 4 c3 as above) d6?

I suppose my point is that [following 1.d4 e6 2.e4 c5] the position after either 3.Nf3 or 3.c3 is already one you'd expect to get from a Sicilian move order. Putting it another way, why would Black want to avoid the Sicilian after reaching a position that already comes under the umbrella of the Sicilian? If 3...a6!? was any good against 3.c3/Nf3, you'd expect to see it more often via 1.e4 c5 etc.. A similar point could be made about the Franco-Benoni itself - if it really was a quality Opening, wouldn't you expect to see it more often via 1.e4 e6 2.d4 c5 (i.e. the French move-order)? Nevertheless, 3.c3 a6!? 4.Nf3 b5!? might be playable (not 4...d5?! 5.e5! with an Advance French where ...a6 looks wasted). On the other hand, 3.Nf3 a6 4.Nc3! would tempt Black into an Open Sicilian once again (yes I know - 4...b5!? Roll Eyes).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
M.Nb
Guest


Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #10 - 05/11/05 at 20:54:34
Post Tools
I am one of those Dutch players, who prefer 1.d4 e6. On 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 I came to about the same conclusions as Paul Cumbers. But I had one question: what if White does not play e4? Say 1.d4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Bg5 and what are Black's options?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1947
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #9 - 05/08/05 at 20:00:25
Post Tools
I took a brief look at the Franco-Benoni recently -- I bought Paul Fields' (1991) book at the recent Durham Congress -- and was surprised at how little-explored this opening seems to be. Theory doesn't appear to have moved on since Bohm--Konikowski, Dortmund 1981!

Is it clear that non-Sicilian options for Black after 3 c3 and 3 Nf3 are inferior? This might depend on what you think of Owen's Defence, of course, and I'd like to ask you, Paul, why you think the Owen's isn't so great (it's discussed/defended on various threads on the 1 e4 ... forum, esp. the one started by MarkPharoah ...).

But besides recourse to a possible Owen's (can or should White avoid this?) after 3 c3 b6 or 3 Nf3 b6, there are other choices for Black -- offbeat-looking admittedly, but are they clearly bad? How about:

3 c3 a6!? (4 Nf3 b5 or ...d5)?

3 Nf3 a6!? 4 d5 (or 4 c3 as above) d6?







  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Cumbers
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 175
Location: Grantham
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #8 - 05/08/05 at 12:32:29
Post Tools
Quote:
Sorry to have to contradict you, M.Nb, but there is also the Franco-Benoni : 1.d4, e6 2. e4, c5. But you do not have to dislike the french to play that.

If you play the Franco-Benoni, you have to be ready for an Open Sicilian with 3.Nf3 or a c3-Sicilian with 3.c3. Also, after 3.c3 d5 4.e5 Black would find himself in a French anyway. The only good way to avoid this would be 3...Nf6 when 4.e5 Nd5 transposes to a variation of the c3-Sicilian with 2...Nf6. Nevertheless, if White has played 1.d4 he probably won't want to transpose into a 1.e4 opening.

In practice, the Franco-Benoni doesn't seem to be very popular (maybe partly due to these tricky transpositions), and 1.d4 e6 players are happy to enter a French with 2.e4 d5. The point of 1.d4 e6 is usually to avoid the Trompowsky whilst allowing Black to aim for his favourite Nimzo-Indian or Modern Benoni. Some Dutch players also like it (i.e. 1.d4 e6 2.c4/g3/Nf3 f5!) as it avoids certain awkward variations (e.g. 1.d4 f5 2.Bg5/e4). And of course 1.d4 e6 2.c4 b6 is the English Defence.

1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ is quirky but hardly a reason for White to avoid 2.c4. Even so, 2.Nf3 is popular with 2...c5!? being an interesting idea [see Eric Prie's section at ChessPublishing.com, but watch out for that Open Sicilian again with 3.e4!]. Or, if you play the Dutch, go ahead with 2...f5, but I wouldn't recommend 2...b6 on account of 3.e4! with an Owen's Defence which isn't that great for Black.

2.Nc3!? has some independent significance. Black must be careful, e.g. 2...f5?! 3.e4! with a bad Dutch (i.e. after 1.d4 f5 2.Nc3, Black would avoid 2...e6?! in favour of 2...d5 or Nf6). Also, 2...c5 3.dxc5 Bxc5 4.Ne4! transposes to a good line for White normally reached via 1.d4 c5. The threat of Nxc5/Nd6+ gives White the bishop-pair, although Stefan Bucker thinks 4...Bb4+! 5.c3 d5 6.cxb4 dxe4 7.Qxd8+ Kxd8 is fine for Black. Finally, 2...b6 3.e4 is Owen's Defence again.

The safest answer to 2.Nc3 is either 2...Nf6 or d5. But then the game reaches a Veresov-type position with Black having restricted his options by committing himself to an early ...e6 (e.g. there's no 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.Bg5 c5!?). Also after, say, 2...Nf6 3.Bg5 (or 3.e4 d5) 3...d5 4.e4, Black finds himself in a Classical French which might not suit fans of the Winawer! Glenn Flear suggested 2...d5 3.Nf3 c5!? to me, but 4.e4 dxe4 (or 4...Nf6 5.Bg5) 5.Nxe4 cxd4 6.Qxd4 seems to give White a useful lead in development. Maybe the best bet is 2...d5 3.Nf3 Nf6, but an early ...e6 and ...d5 looks like the sort of thing a QGD enthusiast would play, not devotees of the Nimzo-Indian / Modern Benoni!

One final thought: is 2.Nc3 Bb4!? playable? Undecided Obviously Black would be happy with 3.e4 d5 (the Winawer!), but can White take advantage of the fact that he hasn't played e4 yet? Any thoughts much appreciated.

P.S. Check out the 1.d4, e6; thread for a similar discussion:
http://altmax.com/cgi-local/cpf/YaBB.cgi?board=dpawnspecials;action=display;num=...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
HgMan
God Member
*****
Offline


Demand me nothing: What
you know, you know

Posts: 2330
Location: Up on Cripple Creek
Joined: 11/09/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #7 - 05/04/05 at 13:27:12
Post Tools
I think the bigger point here is that Black would not be playing 1 ... e6 without having some plan in response to 2 e4.
  

"Luck favours the prepared mind."  --Louis Pasteur
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
elspringer
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 170
Location: Gent
Joined: 03/26/04
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #6 - 04/28/05 at 06:31:44
Post Tools
Sorry to have to contradict you, M.Nb, but there is also the Franco-Benoni : 1.d4, e6 2. e4, c5. But you do not have to dislike the french to play that.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #5 - 08/30/04 at 07:13:09
Post Tools
Nobody who dislikes the French, will ever play 1.d4 e6. It just makes no sense.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patrick
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Play chess!

Posts: 15
Location: England
Joined: 08/28/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #4 - 08/29/04 at 09:07:04
Post Tools
They might do if they're not happy to play a french.
  

Gower Power
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #3 - 07/23/04 at 08:48:11
Post Tools
Any Black player (like me) playing 1.d4 e6 will not mind 2.e4 of course.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #2 - 07/23/04 at 07:29:37
Post Tools
I'd definitely consider 1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ 3.Nd2 as okay for white (I don't know exactly for which side it is advantageous that the moves 2...Nf6 3.Nf3 have been left out in comparison to a well-established sharp Bogo Indian variation). Also there's the the question of what one would do instead of 2.c4 anyway, 2.e4 might lead to positions one doesn't want to play and 2.Nf3 might be non-ideal after either 2...c5 or maybe even 2...b6!?.

I just had a look at TWIC and indeed after 3.Bb4+ the move 3.Bd2 doesn't score well for white (49%), but not primarily because of 3...Bxd2+ 4.Qxd2 after which black has swapped off his dark-squared bishop while at the same time having set up his pawns (well, the one he's moved anyway) on the white squares. The main move seems to be rather 3...a5, which is sort of similar to some Bogo-Indian variations. The move 3.Nd2 scores 58% for white.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10757
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: This is an odd one.
Reply #1 - 07/23/04 at 05:23:18
Post Tools
<2. c4 would work out advantageously for white>
Uh? 2...d5, 2...Nf6 and 2...f5 are respectable moves.
What about 1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ 3.Nbd2!?
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo