
I don't understand the 12. d5 comments, the line given on this site as a refutation--I spent the money on the book for nothing?--involves Anand v. Bruzon. But didn't Anand play d5 on the 14th (not 12th)move? Is this really a refutation?
Actually, Davies mentions the plan adopted by Anand, saying that black's 22....Nd7 is correct, planning on Be5 and Nd7 to f6.
G.M. Renet doesn't give any analysis on this (on the index page), but states that Nxh7 kills black. I was browsing this site, wondering if I should subscribe, but I'm skeptical...On the other hand, 22. ...h6 loses on the spot and all the games I could find with Bh4 from black is losing for him. None of them saw Nd7 from black on the 22nd move, though. I couldn't find anything after Kxh7 that looks convincing...O.K. so don't spill the beans on Renet's analysis, but is it convincing after Nxh7? I'd like to know...It looks like after Kxh7 by black, 24.f6 Nxf6 25.Rxf6 black plays Be5 (Qxf6 loses to the discovered I guess). I just don't see it.
Davies analysis isn't refuted because he didn't give any in his book, he only gave 22. ...Nd7 with Be5 and Nf6 coming up, no further info apparently needed. He also said there needed to be further tests. You know, the traditional fallback...