Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 40
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) C11: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd (Read 344334 times)
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #106 - 07/24/06 at 01:39:33
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 07/23/06 at 13:22:05:

b)11.h4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Rh3 b4 14.Na4 (14.Ne2 a5 and 15...Ba6) Bxd4 15.Qxd4 a5 16.Bb5 Qc7 17.Kb1 Qb7 18.Bd3 Qc6 19.b3 Ba6 and White has made some undesirable concessions.

I looked at some alternatives to White's 18th move in this line:

18.Qd3 can be met by 18...Rb8 and White has accomplished nothing.

18.Bxd7 Bxd7 19.Nc5 Qc6 20.Nxd7 Qxd7 looks pretty lifeless (and this method of play looks soulless).

18.c4 looks like a reasonable possibility, and it might be a slight improvement; then 18...bxc3 19.Nxc3 has to be examined.  This might be worth a look, and I will try to dig a little deeper.

Note: 11.h4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Rh3 b4 14.Na4 Bxd4 15.Qxd4 a5 16.Bb5 is a main line, and 16...Rb8 (given in Watson's book) also looks like a good move for Black.

15...Qa5 is an promising alternative on Black's previous move.

From the look I've had so far, it seems that White might have a bit of trouble proving more than a tiny advantage (or even that much!) in the 11.h4 lines.  If there are no improvements for White in MNb's line (18.c4 above looks marginal, if it's even an improvement) then it looks like 11.h4 will not be my choice.

11.g3 was played in at least one important game (Enders-Knaak, Bundesliga 1999/0-1 (42), but this move doesn't seem consistent with White's general plan of attacking kingside and the game that I found does nothing to raise the status of this move.

11.Qf2 (currently the frontrunner), 11.Nb3 are still likely choices and I haven't ruled out 11.Kb1 (yet).  

If anyone has an idea to make 11.h4 more attractive than it looks right now, I'd love to hear it.  18.c4 seems unlikely to be strong enough to resurrect the line, but I will look a bit deeper at this before discarding it.
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #105 - 07/23/06 at 22:06:54
Post Tools
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bc5 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0-0 a6


current position

MNb: 

The lines you gave for 11.Qf2 were very good 'food for thought' and did much to reinforce my inclination that this is a good way to go.  In youre line 12...b5 13.Be3 b4 14.Na4 a5 15.Nc5 Nxc5 16.Bxc5 Re8 17.Bb5, the move 15.Nc5 looks like it might be a new idea.  I've seen 15.h4 (which I like) and 15.Bb5 (which I'm not so sure about) played here, and I think your move looks like a good alternative.

11.Nb3 is also interesting, but I must admit that I don't understand the ideas behind this move (unless there is just one - to avoid exchanges!).

I have a bit of work to do before I understand 11.h4 well enough to decide whether I like this move enough to try it - or dislike it enough to reject it (the lines you gave weigh in on this side).

woofwoof:

Your suggested 11.Nxc6 looks like a new move, and an interesting one to consider.  It's a radical solution to the threat of ...b5, that's for sure!  But it's not without its potential drawbacks (opening the b-file for Black and giving him a stronger center).

Thanks for the suggestions!
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
woofwoof
God Member
*****
Offline


chess is like life

Posts: 929
Location: Singapore
Joined: 07/04/05
Gender: Male
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5
Reply #104 - 07/23/06 at 18:15:06
Post Tools
My 1st impression on looking at the posn was 11. NxN. Ya, it forces a few exchanges, but the thing is it can prevent b5 which isnt too pleasing to face at least for me,(depending on black's responses) or at least blunts/subdues its effects somewhat.

It may be a mistake, i dunno. i didnt really examine it deeply, but i'm also a bit mentally numb at the moment. But black's b5 is a source or concern, at least for me. And it does look, at least by 1st impressions, that black is better developed/coordinated for Q-side play compared to White on the K-side.
  

"I don't make mistakes. I make prophecies which immediately turn out to be wrong." - Murray Walker
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #103 - 07/23/06 at 13:36:01
Post Tools
MNb said, 

Quote:
I can't help wondering, why Black's position should be better compared to 7...a6 etc. Black has already castled, while after 7...a6 his king often stays on e8 for a while.


To be honest, this may simply be a matter of taste.  Black has to make some sort of commital move at move 7.  He can play 7...Qb6, 7...cd4, 7...a6, or 7...0-0.  But Black already has to decide the contours of the battle.  Looking at old databases, it appears to me that Black has been doing better than fine in the position on the board.   

Unfortunately, Bad Pritt has made the very timely comment that theory is changing dramatically.  White's score in all variations that I just mentioned has been improving in the last three years or so, and it seems that it's Black's turn to come up with something useful.

My move order, as I mentioned, is the most popular.  It doesn't mean it's best or optimal or anything else.  I like it because it is quite a bit more subtle than the once-subtle 7...a6.  Black has actually given himself some flexibility and better attacking chances (at least in theory) than in the 7...a6 line. 

My statements shouldn't be read as the final word by any stretch.  As I said at the beginning, I think this is almost purely a matter of taste (except that 7...Qb6 and 7...0-0 may have been proven to be premature).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10779
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #102 - 07/23/06 at 13:22:05
Post Tools
I can't help wondering, why Black's position should be better compared to 7...a6 etc. Black has already castled, while after 7...a6 his king often stays on e8 for a while. As White also has castled, it is his task to prove that Black has brought his king into unsafety.
a)Regarding 11.f5 I don't see it after Ndxe5 12.Nxc6 Bxe3 13.Qxe3 Nxc6.
b)11.h4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Rh3 b4 14.Na4 (14.Ne2 a5 and 15...Ba6) Bxd4 15.Qxd4 a5 16.Bb5 Qc7 17.Kb1 Qb7 18.Bd3 Qc6 18.b3 Ba6 and White has made some undesirable concessions.
c)After 11.Nb3 I don't like b6 nor Bb4. As White's knight are quite far from the kingside and it looks, if he has lesser control of e5, I wondered if 11.Nb3 Be7 12.Bd3 f6 13.exf6 Nxf6 was playable. 14.Rhe1 b5 15.Kb1 Bd6 16.Nd4 Bd7 17.Nxc6 Bxc6 18.Bd4 might still be somewhat better for White. That leaves 11.Nb3 Bxe3 12.Qxe3 b5 13.Bd3 b4
c1)14.Na4 a5 15.Qh3 h6 (is f5 that bad? 16.g4 Nb6)16.g4 Ba6 17.g5 with a strong attack.
c2)14.Ne4 a5 15.Qh3 a4 16.Nd6 h6 17.Nd2 does not look good.
d)11.g3 is not consequent. Bxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 and where is White's play?
e)11.Kb1 also looks slow. Waht about Bxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Qe3 b4 14.Na4 Nxd4 15.Rxd4 Qa5 16.Qb3 Rb8 17.Be2 Nxe5 18.fxe5 Bd7 ? And 12...Nxd4 13.Qxd4 b5 14.Bd3 Qb6 looks like some efficient vacuum cleaning again. Note, that the same position, but with the king on c1, might arise after
f)11.Qf2, when I suggest Bxd4 12.Bxd4 Nxd4 13.Qxd4 b5 14.g4!? Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.Bg2. 12...b5 13.Be3 b4 14.Na4 a5 15.Nc5 Nxc5 16.Bxc5 Re8 17.Bb5 and White has two active bishops.
I hope, that I have offered some food for thought. There are some difficult decisions ahead. It would probably take me a week to make the wrong ones!
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #101 - 07/23/06 at 07:53:36
Post Tools
I am really tired, and I'm sure I've never seen the move tried, but I just thought of 11.f5.  The tired lines I'm seeing that make it interesting includes the ideas that either Nxe5 runs into some sort of shot.   

11...Nce5 12.fe6 fe6 Ne6!   

11...Nde5 12.Nc6!?

11...ef5 12.Nd5


Which leaves moves such as 

11...Nxd4 12.Bd4 Bd4 13.Qd4 14.ef5 Qd5+

I am positive I'm missing something really simple but my tired brain won't let me see it.  What do you all think?  Is 11.f5 a candidate move?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #100 - 07/23/06 at 03:34:22
Post Tools
10.g3 was a major option last move, but I don't know if 11.g3 has been played or suggested here.  I will take a look.
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #99 - 07/23/06 at 03:09:35
Post Tools
I don't remember,  but isn't 11.g3 a move here?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #98 - 07/22/06 at 19:56:41
Post Tools
I'll adopt Smyslov_Fan's style for opening the discussion on White's next move (just call me Smyslov_Fan_Fan... Wink).

I'm going to wait until Monday evening to see what my allies have to say.

My main choices are: 

  • 11.h4 (intending Rh3)
  • 11.Qf2 (intending Bd3 and Qh4)
  • 11.Nb3 (a relatively unexplored Nijboer 'patent' that Khalifman seems to like)
  • 11.Kb1 (a useful waiting move in many 0-0-0 positions)
  • 11.Something else.  (Please explain what that may be!)


Thanks for your help!  Let's get some discussion going before Willempie fetch's that cow... Grin
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BadPritt
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 36
Joined: 07/13/06
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #97 - 07/22/06 at 14:11:14
Post Tools
Indeed Khalifman gives Svidler-Bareev, Elista 1997 as his main line. Black has, however, a better continuation at 2 points. After 10)...Qe7 11)Kb1 Nxd4 12)Bxd4:

A) 12)...Nb6 13)Bxc5 Qxc5 14)Nb5 Bd7 15)Nd4 Na4 16) Nb3 Qb6 17)Qd4 Rac8 18)Qxb6 Nxb6 19)g3 Rc7 20)Nd4 Nc8 21) Bd3 +=     Khalifman-Korchnoi, Drammen 2005;

B) 12)...b6 13)h4 Bb7 14)h5 Rad8 15)Qe3 Nb8 16)h6 g6 17)Nb5 Nc6 18)c3 a6 19)bxc5 bxc5 20)Nd6 f6 21)Re1 c4 22)Nxb7 Qxb7 23)exf6 Rxf6 24)g3 Qa7 25)Bh3 Qxe3 26) Rxe3 Kf7 27 Rhe1 Rd6 28)b3 +=

Yes Smyslov_Fan, theory is  changing fast. For example, the Kings Indian seems to have lost a lot of its popularity due to the Bayonet attack. Now here I have John Nunn's 1990 book The Classical Kings Indian. It has 110 pages devoted to the study of the position after 1)d4 Nf6 2)c4 g6 3)Nc3 Bg7 4)e4 d6 5) Nf3 0-0 6)Be2 e5 7)0-0 Nc6 8)d5 Ne7. 
Have you ever wondered what people were thinking about 9)b4 Nh5 10)Re1! before 1990? The answer is that nobody ever thought of 10)Re1! at all!
Now if you come to think about it, isn't it amazing that all these great players that have been analyzing this position for hours and hours never ever seriously considered 10)Re1? Of course it is, but it also shows how complicated and surprising our game still can be. Makes you wonder how many strong moves are still waiting to be discovered in all these variations that supposedly are almost analyzed to death!  Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #96 - 07/22/06 at 13:45:36
Post Tools
(And the cow goes "mooooo".)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
OstapBender
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no spoon.

Posts: 1491
Location: not in Kansas anymore
Joined: 10/16/04
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #95 - 07/22/06 at 06:33:19
Post Tools
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bc5 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0-0 a6


current position


Fetch the cow? Huh  I'm not sure, but I have a strange feeling that we may have landed in a King Arthur tale gone awry...  Undecided  (Oh, dear!)
  

"If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates."  -Jay Leno
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #94 - 07/22/06 at 05:36:25
Post Tools
Aside, to Willempie:  

Fetchez la vache!

Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #93 - 07/22/06 at 05:32:45
Post Tools
The concensus from my allies and my own desires is to play the most popular move.

Therefore, after
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bc5 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0-0

I will play:

10...a6

And try to uphold the honor of the French.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Steinitz:  1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd
Reply #92 - 07/22/06 at 05:24:54
Post Tools
The game between Svidler and Bareev was played in the Russian Championship in 1997.  However, this was a knock-out game.  Officially (that is, according to ChessBase) it was in a "normal" time control.  But this appears to have been the 5th game in the match.  That would make it either a blitz game or a very fast one depending on the rules at the time.  I'll try to find out more later.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 40
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo