MNb wrote on 07/23/06 at 13:22:05:
b)11.h4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Rh3 b4 14.Na4 (14.Ne2 a5 and 15...Ba6) Bxd4 15.Qxd4 a5 16.Bb5 Qc7 17.Kb1 Qb7 18.Bd3 Qc6 19.b3 Ba6 and White has made some undesirable concessions.
I looked at some alternatives to White's 18th move in this line:
18.Qd3 can be met by 18...Rb8 and White has accomplished nothing.
18.Bxd7 Bxd7 19.Nc5 Qc6 20.Nxd7 Qxd7 looks pretty lifeless (and this method of play looks soulless).
18.c4 looks like a reasonable possibility, and it might be a slight improvement; then 18...bxc3 19.Nxc3 has to be examined. This might be worth a look, and I will try to dig a little deeper.
Note: 11.h4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 13.Rh3 b4 14.Na4 Bxd4 15.Qxd4 a5 16.Bb5 is a main line, and 16...Rb8 (given in Watson's book) also looks like a good move for Black.
15...Qa5 is an promising alternative on Black's previous move.
From the look I've had so far, it seems that White might have a bit of trouble proving more than a tiny advantage (or even that much!) in the 11.h4 lines. If there are no improvements for White in MNb's line (18.c4 above looks marginal, if it's even an improvement) then it looks like 11.h4 will not be my choice.
11.g3 was played in at least one important game (Enders-Knaak, Bundesliga 1999/0-1 (42), but this move doesn't seem consistent with White's general plan of attacking kingside and the game that I found does nothing to raise the status of this move.
11.Qf2 (currently the frontrunner), 11.Nb3 are still likely choices and I haven't ruled out 11.Kb1 (yet).
If anyone has an idea to make 11.h4 more attractive than it looks right now, I'd love to hear it. 18.c4 seems unlikely to be strong enough to resurrect the line, but I will look a bit deeper at this before discarding it.