Quote:Its the other way around isnt it?
"Modern line against the alekhine"...
4.Nf3 for sure is a good move (and nothing more) but it wont scare me away from the alekhine.
I think the most solid way is to play the modern;) way:
4..dxe5 and Kengis (5..g6)
or Miles (5..c6)
I would agree that those are among the most solid ways of playing it, but if you play that way you are really playing something rather similar to a Scandinavian, which perhaps isn't to everyone's taste. The old 4...Bg4, followed usually by 4...c6, appears to be the choice of the very few current GM Alekhine practitioners, notably Baburin and, on occasion, Krasenkow.
Lately I've been putting together an extensive set of notes on Alekhine's, and I think this latter system, named for Salo Flohr, is playable. In all honesty, I think that in this and in all Black's ways of dealing with the Modern (and possibly in the Four Pawns Attack as well, for that matter) Black fails to equalize if White plays well. But I think, at least in the Flohr, Kengis and Miles variations, he can at worst obtain good chances to draw.
One line of particular interest, not considered in the books, is 4...Bg4 5.Be2 c6 7.0-0 Bxf3 8.Bxf3 dxe5 9.dxe5 e6 10.Re1 Nd7 11.Nd2 Qc7 12.Nc4 Be7!? (theory considers 12...Nbd6 13.Qd4 Nxc4 15.Qxc4 and soon ...0-0-0, with pawn assaults on opposite flanks; the text is much more conservative) 13. Nd6+ Kf8. I have an analysis from here which I won't bother to share. While the knight's early appearance on d6 is impressive, I'm not sure that White can sustain it or prove advantage. I've had this twice against reasonably strong opponents and each has failed to demonstrate any advantage for White.
Somewhere on my project list is to analyze 4...Nc6, but one thing disuading me is that 5. exd6 pretty well compels 5...exd6, when Black's early ...Nc6 is suboptimal. The other thing, of course, is that I doubt the soundness of Black's position after 5. c4 Nb6 6. e6.