Keano wrote on 02/11/10 at 16:32:25:
I think everyone is getting a bit carried away here - there are advantages and dis-advantages to all move-orders and to start saying one is better than the other at this early stage is a bit ludicrous in my view. We seem to have strayed somewhat off-topic into the twilight zone
Yes, various move orders do involve trade-offs. But when grandmasters universally use a specific move order, then it is useful to ask if it really is just a question of trade-offs, or a question of one move order being unquestionably better than the other.
I don't agree either that this is off topic. I think a discussion of move orders is directly relevant in a decision about the best option against the Catalan.
In the specific case being discussed, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6, grandmasters universally play 3. Nf3 and not 3. g3.
John Hall wrote on 02/11/10 at 16:20:27:
I believe the reason is that black can collapse the white centre in a way he can't against the normal Catalan move order:
1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. g3 dxc4
4. Bg2 c5
5. Nf3 Nc6
I think this is a bit better for black than what he can get with the 3. Nf3 move order.
And Nigel Daives in his recent "Play the Catalan" agrees with you here. Indeed, in the position after 5...Nc6, it does not take GM insight to see Black is fine.
By the way, I think this book is the most instructive I have come across when it comes to discussing move order issues in the Catalan. It is an irritant that most Catalan books give scant attention to the issue of move orders.