Latest Updates:
Poll
Poll Question: Which Anti-Catalan do you want to see in IM John Cox' book?
bars   pie

Open Catalan (with 6...dxc4)    
  5 (8.1%)
Open Catalan (with 5...dxc4)    
  0 (0.0%)
Open Catalan (with 4...dxc4)    
  8 (12.9%)
Closed Catalan (with ...c6)    
  8 (12.9%)
Semi-Tarrasch (with ...c5)    
  2 (3.2%)
Pseudo-Tango (with ...Nc6)    
  4 (6.5%)
Disruptive check (4...Bb4+)    
  25 (40.3%)
Occupy the centre (4...c5 5.Bg2 cxd4 6.Nxd4 e5)    
  5 (8.1%)
Something else    
  5 (8.1%)




Total votes: 62
« Created by: MNb on: 02/07/10 at 00:59:17 »
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book (Read 40928 times)
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #41 - 06/19/10 at 18:11:39
Post Tools
It seems that the final request is to see the 4...Bb4+ in the book. This looks reasonable because Black can easily impove over Avrukh's analysis and i'm sure mr Cox knows this.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #40 - 02/15/10 at 21:46:02
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 02/14/10 at 11:28:30:
This is a much better version of the Stonewall for White because he can play f3+e4 quickly. This is what Marin says in his "old" Catalan Chessbase CD. There are musch morereliable lines for Black imo

Maybe, but it isnt a stonewall, as c6 is not played black may have lost the tempo on f3-e4, but it also gives other opportunities, such as the idea of going ..dxe4 fxe4 fxe4 and then go for e5.
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Antillian
God Member
*****
Offline


Brilliance without dazzle!

Posts: 1757
Joined: 01/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #39 - 02/15/10 at 17:56:32
Post Tools
Okay - fair enough.
  

"Breakthrough results come about by a series of good decisions, diligently executed and accumulated one on top of another." Jim Collins --- Good to Great
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #38 - 02/15/10 at 11:30:10
Post Tools
The question of 3.g3 is indeed relevant - I was referring to the other posters going on about the Reti move-order. Its a book on the QGD, which as it happens is including a bonus chapter on the Catalan - people wanting a line against the Reti move-order also is in my view pushing it a bit.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Antillian
God Member
*****
Offline


Brilliance without dazzle!

Posts: 1757
Joined: 01/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #37 - 02/14/10 at 15:29:08
Post Tools
Keano wrote on 02/11/10 at 16:32:25:
I think everyone is getting a bit carried away here - there are advantages and dis-advantages to all move-orders and to start saying one is better than the other at this early stage is a bit ludicrous in my view. We seem to have strayed somewhat off-topic into the twilight zone  Huh


Yes, various move orders do involve trade-offs. But when grandmasters universally use a specific move order, then it is useful to ask if it really is  just a question of trade-offs, or a question of one move order being unquestionably better than the other. 

I don't agree either that this is off topic. I think a discussion of move orders is directly relevant in a decision about the best option against the Catalan.

In the specific case being discussed, after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6, grandmasters universally play 3. Nf3 and not 3. g3. 

John Hall wrote on 02/11/10 at 16:20:27:
I believe the reason is that black can collapse the white centre in a way he can't against the normal Catalan move order:

1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. g3 dxc4
4. Bg2 c5
5. Nf3 Nc6

I think this is a bit better for black than what he can get with the 3. Nf3 move order.


And Nigel Daives in his recent "Play the Catalan" agrees with you here. Indeed, in the position after 5...Nc6, it does not take GM insight to see Black is fine.

By the way, I think this book is the most instructive I have come across when it comes to discussing move order issues in the Catalan. It is an irritant that most Catalan books give scant attention to the issue of move orders. 
  

"Breakthrough results come about by a series of good decisions, diligently executed and accumulated one on top of another." Jim Collins --- Good to Great
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #36 - 02/14/10 at 11:28:30
Post Tools
This is a much better version of the Stonewall for White because he can play f3+e4 quickly. This is what Marin says in his "old" Catalan Chessbase CD. There are musch morereliable lines for Black imo
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #35 - 02/13/10 at 16:41:09
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 02/13/10 at 12:52:48:
Let's come back to chess people!

Willempie wrote on 02/11/10 at 17:21:18:
I myself was wondering a little about the closed catalan a la Lasker with Ne4 and holding back on c6 for the moment. I couldnt find much about it in the book of Avrukh (black always plays c6 before Ne4 there). If you follow up with f5 you can either play a stonewall or play analogous to Pillsbury (Queen to the f-file and the likes).


In the Lasker Black plays Ne4 because there is already Nc3 and Bg5 and two pieces can be exchanged. But here after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 Be7 5.Bg2 O-O 6.O-O Ne4?! there is no Nc3 neither Bg5! If i remember correctly Marin in his Catalan CD reccomended here 7.Nfd2 which is logical.

I would also consider it one move later, so first 6..Nbd7.
Still I dont see much after7.Nfd2 f5(with c6 in this idea is not good as you lack a tempo)
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #34 - 02/13/10 at 12:52:48
Post Tools
Let's come back to chess people!

Willempie wrote on 02/11/10 at 17:21:18:
I myself was wondering a little about the closed catalan a la Lasker with Ne4 and holding back on c6 for the moment. I couldnt find much about it in the book of Avrukh (black always plays c6 before Ne4 there). If you follow up with f5 you can either play a stonewall or play analogous to Pillsbury (Queen to the f-file and the likes).


In the Lasker Black plays Ne4 because there is already Nc3 and Bg5 and two pieces can be exchanged. But here after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 Be7 5.Bg2 O-O 6.O-O Ne4?! there is no Nc3 neither Bg5! If i remember correctly Marin in his Catalan CD reccomended here 7.Nfd2 which is logical.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Antillian
God Member
*****
Offline


Brilliance without dazzle!

Posts: 1757
Joined: 01/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #33 - 02/12/10 at 14:47:44
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 02/11/10 at 19:32:49:
Antillian wrote on 02/10/10 at 09:31:43:
BPaulsen wrote on 02/10/10 at 08:09:14:

Am I the only one getting the impression some black players want a system and are trying not to learn how to play chess based on the needs in each position?


Judging from the innumerable posts with the like of "How do I play my defence against 1. c4, 1. Nf3 etc", the answer to that question is an emphatic yes. 


You mean an emphatic no.


Yes!
  

"Breakthrough results come about by a series of good decisions, diligently executed and accumulated one on top of another." Jim Collins --- Good to Great
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #32 - 02/11/10 at 19:32:49
Post Tools
Antillian wrote on 02/10/10 at 09:31:43:
BPaulsen wrote on 02/10/10 at 08:09:14:

Am I the only one getting the impression some black players want a system and are trying not to learn how to play chess based on the needs in each position?


Judging from the innumerable posts with the like of "How do I play my defence against 1. c4, 1. Nf3 etc", the answer to that question is an emphatic yes. 


You mean an emphatic no.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Vandros
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 71
Joined: 07/18/09
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #31 - 02/11/10 at 17:44:55
Post Tools
John Hall wrote on 02/11/10 at 16:20:27:
I believe the reason is that black can collapse the white centre in a way he can't against the normal Catalan move order:

1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. g3 dxc4
4. Bg2 c5
5. Nf3 Nc6

I think this is a bit better for black than what he can get with the 3. Nf3 move order.

That is an interesting line.

After 6.Qa4, it is a reversed Grünfeld with a tempo plus for White. So, it's not so easy for black to equalise.

#1 6...cxd4 7.0-0 Nf6 8.Nxd4 is the reversed sharp Grünfeld line. So it my be helpful, to know the theorie of that variation.

#2 However, what will happen when black is playing 6....Qa5+, changing the queens?
« Last Edit: 02/11/10 at 19:24:48 by Vandros »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #30 - 02/11/10 at 17:21:18
Post Tools
I myself was wondering a little about the closed catalan a la Lasker with Ne4 and holding back on c6 for the moment. I couldnt find much about it in the book of Avrukh (black always plays c6 before Ne4 there). If you follow up with f5 you can either play a stonewall or play analogous to Pillsbury (Queen to the f-file and the likes).
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #29 - 02/11/10 at 16:32:25
Post Tools
I think everyone is getting a bit carried away here - there are advantages and dis-advantages to all move-orders and to start saying one is better than the other at this early stage is a bit ludicrous in my view. We seem to have strayed somewhat off-topic into the twilight zone  Huh
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Hall
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 44
Joined: 01/23/08
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #28 - 02/11/10 at 16:20:27
Post Tools
I believe the reason is that black can collapse the white centre in a way he can't against the normal Catalan move order:

1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. g3 dxc4
4. Bg2 c5
5. Nf3 Nc6

I think this is a bit better for black than what he can get with the 3. Nf3 move order.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Papageno
Senior Member
****
Offline


FM

Posts: 299
Location: Germany
Joined: 06/12/08
Gender: Male
Re: Anti-Catalan for IM John Cox' book
Reply #27 - 02/11/10 at 15:52:39
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 02/11/10 at 10:50:13:
A not so relevant question: after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.g3?! i have heard that this is inacurate .If White wants a Catalan he should play 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 according to Aagaard but what is the specific reason?

I'm just guessing that the 3.g3?! move order also has the disadvantage of allowing black to grab the pawn like this:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 dxc4 4. Bg2 c6 5. Nf3 Nd7 6. O-O b5 7. a4 Bb7 8. Nc3 a6 9. Ne5 Nxe5 10. dxe5 Ne7 *

If you play it with 3. Nf3 (e.g. according to Avrukh 1) there are probably better lines like this:
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 dxc4 4. e3 (regular QGA)
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 Nbd7 6. O-O c6 7. a4
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 c6 6. Ne5 (two Catalan lines not allowing c6 +b5 for black)

3. g3 seems to me to limit White's choice more than necessary and rules out playing the QGA with 4.e3
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo