Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) The best analysis program? (Read 249260 times)
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3180
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #28 - 04/07/12 at 20:22:05
Post Tools
TN wrote on 04/07/12 at 13:08:33:
Uninstall and reinstall the engine, then when you add the UCI engine, tick the box 'below priority'

Thanks! Smiley
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #27 - 04/07/12 at 13:08:33
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 04/07/12 at 12:48:57:
The free Houdini 1.5a that I have seems to gradually bring my computer to a near standstill when analysing on ChessBase 10 - is this normal?


Uninstall and reinstall the engine, then when you add the UCI engine, tick the box 'below priority', if I recall correctly. Reducing the number of megabytes on the hashtable can also help.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3180
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #26 - 04/07/12 at 12:48:57
Post Tools
The free Houdini 1.5a that I have seems to gradually bring my computer to a near standstill when analysing on ChessBase 10 - is this normal?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Odd Gunnar Malin
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 27
Location: Vadsø, Norway
Joined: 08/15/07
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #25 - 02/29/12 at 11:41:22
Post Tools
Not a bug but maybe something to know. Komodo has a drawscore=-5 as default (in analyse mode too). It is maybe better to set this to 0 when you use it for analysis. And it is even more important to do this if you use Aquariums IDEA analysis, else you would probably get too much of something that looks like a odd/even scoring.
For IDEA use (or while excluding moves in normal analysis) I wouldn't thrust to enable positional learning, it could give some unpredictable results. (This latest is for other engines than Komodo.)
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jesse Gersenson
Full Member
***
Offline


Piece value = Mobility
+ targets

Posts: 162
Joined: 09/12/09
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #24 - 02/01/12 at 11:42:14
Post Tools
trw wrote on 01/27/12 at 06:49:20:
As a correspondence player, I too highly recommend critter 1.4, also Komodo 3 (4 is out, but it costs money and its extremely buggy while it only boats 10 pt higher elo than 3).


On the rybka forums Komodo 4 gets high praise as an analysis engine. The main reason given is that it's got better positional understanding than the other engines. 

I haven't seen any mention of bugs in Komodo 4 - and, as the webmaster of http://komodochess.com, I'm always on the look out for people mentioning bugs.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Master Om
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 187
Joined: 02/20/10
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #23 - 02/01/12 at 06:51:21
Post Tools
Stefan Buecker wrote on 01/26/12 at 09:25:08:
Many thanks, Vass, Hacker and Vladimir. Now I've read about it, Houdini's Aquarium seems indeed promising, and as someone who spends lots of time with analyzing I should certainly try it. (I didn't try the first version of Aquarium, because in some blogs a bit too many flaws were discussed.)

In some cases (endings, KI positions and so on) Rybka had problems, e.g. in endings Deep Shredder was better. Other programs were useful, too, to get new ideas, so I'll gladly check your interesting suggestions, including Critter 1.4.


Hi Stefan,
             How are you?. Replying you after a long time. Read all the comments here. 
Let me tell you few things. The topic is "Analysis programs" and not Analysis tools, let me first elaborate on the engines first.
The top 5 engines are good in analysing positions you want. All have their strength and weaknesses. Namely - Houdini 2.0c , Critter 1.4 , Stockfish 2.2.2 , Depp Rybka 4.1 and Komodo 4 MP(Yet to be released, now SP only)

Regarding feature rich it is Rybka 4.1. It supports Large pages, Preserve Analysis , Randomizer, Monte Carlo , Multipv_cp and 2048 cores in cpu.

Houdini too supports Large pages, Save Hash , Multipv_cp and 32 cores support with learning feature and Nalimov + Gaviota TBs support. But i find the learning feature a bit faulty in it.
The best learning feature is in Critter 1.4a which implements a session file. Very good for Deep Position Analysis and Backward Analysis in Fritz GUI if you know the right configuration settings.
Here is the link to Unofficial one -http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?w4x1kctds4oa9og

Unofficial, unsupported, and only 64bit Sse4 build:

- tweaked SMP implementation
- sligthly decreased Queen value
- time management: try avoiding blunders in sudden death games when in time trouble
- time management: fixed losing on time whith "ponder on" games on opponent's instant reply
- improved pawn blockage detection (3B4/1r2p3/r2p1p2/bkp1P1p1/1p1P1PPp/p1P4P/PP1K4/3B4 w - - 0 1)

The Stockfish 2.2.2 is good for analysis in IA but not feature rich. So you need a feature rich stockfish which is good for analysis.  Here is an Unofficial one.
Stockfish 2.1.1 PA GTB Gran2c - download http://www.open-chess.org/download/file.php?id=356]

The changes from Stockfish 2.1.1 include:

Preserve Analysis: Stockfish keeps in mind what you have analyzed and doesn't research it until you unload the engine. Perfect for backward propagation of scores and saving time for transpositions.

GTB: Allows the user to use Gaviota Tablebases in Stockfish.

Granularity=2: Allows Stockfish to have more precision on move scores, so that instead of 0.00 -> 0.04 -> 0.08 it goes 0.00 -> 0.01 -> 0.02.
Mac, Win32, Win64 & source included. Source maintained at: https://github.com/jeremybernstein/Stockfish_PA_GTB


The best GUI for Rybka is Aquarium because it uses its feature to the fullest.
Randomizer is good feature which I always use to get a General Idea of a position. Shared Analysis is another feature which is great with Deep Rybka 4.1 . If you haven't read then read here - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=5074]

You can do it manualy
Created a txt file  Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 x64.uci_b or Deep Rybka 4 x64.uci_b and type the following lines.

[ENGINE]
Parameter=%PID %CPUS
[OPTIONSA]
Preserve Analysis=true

And save the file with extension .uci_b in the same folder where the chessabase saves the uci file in appadata/roaming/chessbase/Engines UCI.
While analysing Just right click in engine window and Shared Analysis.

Another feature you can use in Aquarium is the Delta which uses MultiPV_cp for this (UCI3 support).
MultiPV_cp option is to limit multi-PV analysis to moves within a range of the best move.

I use 'delta' in infinite analysis.  Like set delta to 25 and variations to 200.  Then when you run the engine it shows the top move and all other moves that are up to 0.25 pawn worse.  In some positions it will show only one move but in other positions it may show many.  I spend a lot of time running analysis and setting variations to 5 (without delta) wastes a lot of time if there is only one good move.  On the other hand in some positions there may be 10 moves that are all good and I would only see 5 of them.  That's why you will  find delta a great feature.

Note on using Critter in Backward Analysis and in DPA
In IA use Always Resolve Scores and Depth Strategy (say =10) and this seems to be the preferred settings.

With a fast machine and Critter's new session file,  you can run with depth 25, with +1 at the root, with a branching factor of 4, 4, 3, 2, an analysis length of 7, and a window of 30, cutting bad moves. 

Hope this helps you and all. After trying please answer me if its helpful to you.

Regards
Om
  

ICCF IM
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #22 - 01/31/12 at 08:24:35
Post Tools
GMTonyKosten wrote on 01/30/12 at 13:57:58:
I think I should make this thread 'sticky' so it always remains at the top of the first page, as the best analysis program will always be of interest. Anyone disagree?



Done. 

My main problem with sticky topics is that they too get ignored. Let's see what happens to this one.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Playslikefish
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 22
Joined: 12/05/09
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #21 - 01/30/12 at 19:10:30
Post Tools
Does any program here run on a MAC?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GMTonyKosten
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Mr Dynamic?

Posts: 3180
Location: Clermont-Ferrand
Joined: 12/19/02
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #20 - 01/30/12 at 13:57:58
Post Tools
I think I should make this thread 'sticky' so it always remains at the top of the first page, as the best analysis program will always be of interest. Anyone disagree?
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
trw
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1414
Joined: 05/06/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #19 - 01/27/12 at 06:49:20
Post Tools
As a correspondence player, I too highly recommend critter 1.4, also Komodo 3 (4 is out, but it costs money and its extremely buggy while it only boats 10 pt higher elo than 3).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #18 - 01/26/12 at 09:25:08
Post Tools
Many thanks, Vass, Hacker and Vladimir. Now I've read about it, Houdini's Aquarium seems indeed promising, and as someone who spends lots of time with analyzing I should certainly try it. (I didn't try the first version of Aquarium, because in some blogs a bit too many flaws were discussed.)

In some cases (endings, KI positions and so on) Rybka had problems, e.g. in endings Deep Shredder was better. Other programs were useful, too, to get new ideas, so I'll gladly check your interesting suggestions, including Critter 1.4.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Vladimir
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 63
Joined: 05/22/09
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #17 - 01/25/12 at 22:51:17
Post Tools
Stefan Buecker wrote on 01/25/12 at 19:19:33:
Maybe it is time to look for alternatives - thx Vass for your good overview. Presently I am still using Rybka. It doesn't have the highest rating, but what Rybka does well is "backwards analysis". Other programs which I had used were forgetting their results. At least that was my experience. 

Is one of the recent top programs particularly good in "backwards analysis"?


The commercial 2.0 release of Houdini implemented a few analysis features along those lines with an option to save a persistent hash, and a rudimentary position learning. 

The free Critter 1.4 also has similar analysis features with its session files and related options. 

I'd say to get Critter and play around with it to see if it suits your needs. Turn on 'Use session file' and 'Resolve score drops,' and change 'SF strategy' to depth. One note, though, is that Critter's session files are apparently incompatible with Aquarium's IDeA if you happen to use that, so turn them off if you do.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Göran
Senior Member
****
Offline


ChessPublishing is great!

Posts: 454
Location: Sweden
Joined: 02/13/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #16 - 01/25/12 at 21:41:36
Post Tools
@Vass - Thanks for your instructive overview!

Vass wrote on 01/25/12 at 20:25:18:

... What is more, it's (aquarium) an excellent GUI for all the correspondent chess players, though not intuitive at all. One has to read many help pages and experiment with before becoming good at operating with it. And costs much..  Wink


Have used Aquarium for more than 2 years and can really testify to both statements: A lot of work to utilize but great GUI and well worth the struggles to learn.
  

What kind of proof is that?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Vass
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1105
Joined: 06/22/11
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #15 - 01/25/12 at 20:25:18
Post Tools
Thank you, Stefan! You're welcome!
I think the so-called "backwards analysis" depends more from the GUI you use than from the chess engine that makes it. Of course, Rybka 4 as balanced as it is, can be considered as one of the best chess engines to do that properly. Anyway, I'm not the only one that thinks the best GUI for making "backwards analysis" is Aquarium's IDEA. The previous version was Rybka's Aquarium and now Houdini's Aquarium is available. What is more, it's an excellent GUI for all the correspondent chess players, though not intuitive at all. One has to read many help pages and experiment with before becoming good at operating with it. And costs much..  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: The best analysis program?
Reply #14 - 01/25/12 at 19:19:33
Post Tools
Maybe it is time to look for alternatives - thx Vass for your good overview. Presently I am still using Rybka. It doesn't have the highest rating, but what Rybka does well is "backwards analysis". Other programs which I had used were forgetting their results. At least that was my experience. 

Is one of the recent top programs particularly good in "backwards analysis"?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo