Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed) (Read 57068 times)
Pawnpusher
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 274
Joined: 01/04/18
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #50 - 11/21/21 at 12:06:16
Post Tools
It sounds like you are debating the virtues of the ECO codes.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 662
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #49 - 11/21/21 at 06:57:31
Post Tools
Hi.

an ordinary chessplayer wrote on 11/20/21 at 22:59:34:
I don't see the deviating definition. White plays the Averbakh, black has the choice of ...Nf6 transposing to the King's Indian. If black doesn't transpose, it's considered to be still in the Averbakh. Tiger's description "any black line from the 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c4 position that does not involve transposing to the King's Indian with... Nf6." is entirely consistent with that. I wouldn't attach too much importance to the words "black line". White plays a line, black plays a line, it's like a dance.

I mean if your proposition is that this broader definition of the term Averbakh just simply applies. One where both the white moves and the black moves both are considered Averbakh. Then two sources with one saying that these white moves are the Averbakh and the other one that these black moves are the Averbakh can of course  be non-contradictory. Each incomplete on its own but not contradictory.

To me it seems like Tiger, which to be fair actually writes "I define" as this should be a subjective definition, just by putting forward his own definition of the Averbakh without alluding to the previous one more or less created a lot of confusion about what the Averbakh actually is. In such a situation one can broaden to accomodate Tiger's definition, in theory even supplant the old definition or not consider the broadened definition valid at all. I fail to see the upside of doing anything but the third option here. Why not instead give a unique name to non-Nf6 KID? Why share a name between a white line and a black line? Is it really wise to have three things named the Averbakh?

Have a nice day
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10778
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #48 - 11/21/21 at 06:42:52
Post Tools
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 11/20/21 at 19:59:13:
So the fact that the whole name apparently was intended for white's way of playing sort of got lost there.

This I don't get. Unfortunately I can't remember nor refind where and when I met the name Averbakh Variation for the first time (in the Modern); though it was well before Hillarp Persson wrote his first book. To me there was never any doubt that 3.c4 was the move that defined it (excluding the transpositions to the KID).

Confused_by_Theory wrote on 11/20/21 at 19:59:13:
It would also be nice if there would also be names for .....

I'm not a fan of nomenclature a la the Inner-Mongolian Gambit of the Patagonian Variation of the Averbakh Variation of the Modern Defense.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
an ordinary chessplayer
God Member
*****
Offline


I used to be not bad.

Posts: 1808
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)
Joined: 01/02/15
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #47 - 11/20/21 at 22:59:34
Post Tools
I don't see the deviating definition. White plays the Averbakh, black has the choice of ...Nf6 transposing to the King's Indian. If black doesn't transpose, it's considered to be still in the Averbakh. Tiger's description "any black line from the 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c4 position that does not involve transposing to the King's Indian with... Nf6." is entirely consistent with that. I wouldn't attach too much importance to the words "black line". White plays a line, black plays a line, it's like a dance.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 662
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #46 - 11/20/21 at 19:59:13
Post Tools
Hi.

Alright that pretty much explains it. Thank you.

So in effect it is a white setup with 3.c4 against the Modern. Interesting Huh. Based on the Keene & Botterill explanation white presumably is also supposed to play 4.Nc3. Tiger more or less expands on this a little bit by having 4.Nf3 games in the same Averbakh chapter as well. I wouldn't care to much about that though since it seems kinda practical. More strange is that there in effect are two pretty deviating definitions of the Averbakh (just to be clear the Modern version not KID one). since Tiger's is "any black line from the 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c4 position that does not involve transposing to the King's Indian with... Nf6." So the fact that the whole name apparently was intended for white's way of playing sort of got lost there.

I would think the most orderly thing to do would be to retain the Averbakh anti-Modern as a name for the white setup with 1.e4, 2.d4, 3.c4. Also in my personal opinion, for simplicity, it shouldn't really matter much if black has played 1...g6+2...Bg7 or 1...g6+2...d6 and if white continues 4.Nc3, 4.Nf3 or some other move. I won't distinguish at least.

It would also be nice if there would also be names for at least the main black ways of playing. Like for example how 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c4 d6 4.Nc3 Nc6 is known as the Kotov variation asfaik. I sort of fail to see why that should be a named variation and not 4...e5 or to a lesser extent 1.e4 g6 2.d4 d6 3.c4 e5.

Another thing to do would be to forget about subvariations entirely  and come up with some actual better name for the non-Nf6 King's Indian Defence complex than the apparently quite taken Averbakh system. Then you can always say I'm playing the 4...e5 line in the non-Nf6 King's Indian Defence complex or something to that effect and even if it's somewhat sad not to have an actual name for your subvariation people still get you.

Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
an ordinary chessplayer
God Member
*****
Offline


I used to be not bad.

Posts: 1808
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)
Joined: 01/02/15
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #45 - 11/20/21 at 17:10:27
Post Tools
In the Modern, 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7, the Averbakh is the name of the white system beginning 3.c4 d6 4.Nc3. Keene/Botterill (1972) The Modern Defence page 18 says "named in recognition of Averbakh's victories with it in the 1958 USSR Ch and at Hastings 1959-60".
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RoleyPoley
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 746
Location: London
Joined: 12/29/13
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #44 - 11/20/21 at 15:18:55
Post Tools
Confused_by_Theory wrote on 11/20/21 at 10:09:57:
Hi.

Just because I was thinking about this the other day (while playing the very system Wink)

Why exactly is 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.e4 d6 4.Nc3 (or 4.Nf3) 4...e5 called the Averbakh? Is there actually som history behind this or is it just something Tiger came up with?

Is it related to 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 (a sort of embryonic form of the already named Averbakh variation in the KID - 5...0-0 6.Bg5)
And now 5...e5!? being both similar to Tiger's Averbakh and played what looks like just enough for a GM to know about?

And if say playing e5 is the key ingredient of the system what to call 1.d4 g6 2.c4 g6 3.c4 e5? (which turns out different in many cases). Or the even more basic 1.d4 d6 2.c4 e5? (where black basic basically rarely even goes g6). Or 1.d4 d6 2.Nf3 g6 3.c4 Bg7 4.Nc3 (where black can still go 4...e5 but the positions doesn't really resemble Tiger's Averbakh; more or less making it an anti-move order against this very system.

Many questions...
Have a nice day.


Hi Confused_by_theory,

Interesting question. I think this variation was so named before Tiger's book, but I don't know it's history.

Best wishes,

Roley
  

"As Mikhail Tal would say ' Let's have a bit of hooliganism! '"

Victor Bologan.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 662
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #43 - 11/20/21 at 10:09:57
Post Tools
Hi.

Just because I was thinking about this the other day (while playing the very system Wink)

Why exactly is 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.e4 d6 4.Nc3 (or 4.Nf3) 4...e5 called the Averbakh? Is there actually som history behind this or is it just something Tiger came up with?

Is it related to 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 (a sort of embryonic form of the already named Averbakh variation in the KID - 5...0-0 6.Bg5)
And now 5...e5!? being both similar to Tiger's Averbakh and played what looks like just enough for a GM to know about?

And if say playing e5 is the key ingredient of the system what to call 1.d4 g6 2.c4 g6 3.c4 e5? (which turns out different in many cases). Or the even more basic 1.d4 d6 2.c4 e5? (where black basic basically rarely even goes g6). Or 1.d4 d6 2.Nf3 g6 3.c4 Bg7 4.Nc3 (where black can still go 4...e5 but the positions doesn't really resemble Tiger's Averbakh; more or less making it an anti-move order against this very system.

Many questions...
Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 662
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #42 - 08/13/19 at 06:05:23
Post Tools
Hi.

Just a quick observation about the Modern and Tiger's book. There is quite a major shift in recommendation in the Averbakh section that is well worth noting. I played the old move recently and got an utterly lifeless position.

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.c4 d6 4.Nc3 e5 5.Nge2!?
This is not as popular as 5.Nf3, 5.d5 or even 5.dxe5; probably because white needs to be prepared for a few different structures and people are generally ok with the alternatives.
In terms of move orders:
4.Be3 c5!? 5.Ne2 Qb6!? looks ok for black. Also 5...Nc6 seems playable. If white doesn't mind this I suppose he can go for this. 
4.Ne2 seems fully viable. If there is a downside it is probably 4...Nf6 with a KID sideline (if white goes Ng3 later) or if not that then likely a Saemisch with early Ne2. I suppose not everyone would play these variations as white against the KID.
2...d6 3.c4 e5 4.Ne2 Bg7 5.Nbc3 is the move order I used. The position is a bit different if black from move four plays with a postponed Bg7, although even now I can't see how to benefit.
5...Ne7
Instead:
5...Nc6 6.Be3 Nh6 7.f3 f5 8.Qd2! (Tiger's exclam) when both 8...f4, as played by me, and 8...Nf7 are probably not great.
With the new move a plausible line is something like
6.Be3 Nd7 7.Qd2 0-0 8.f3 f5 (Diagram)
Trying to get counterplay even though the centre is not closed. Overall quite a complicated new recommendation. On the other hand if black doesn't go for this (or 5...Nd7 which is also mentioned) it is not clear to me what he should do.

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*
Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gillbod
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 173
Joined: 03/26/13
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #41 - 04/13/19 at 20:26:10
Post Tools
This is old, but in that youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tkJiToQcIM), Tiger mentions that he doesn't like 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.f4 a6 5.Nf3 b5 6.Bd3 Nd7 7.a4 b4 8.Ne2 c5 9.c3. Consequently, he doesn't recommend ...a6 against the Austrian in the GingerGM video.

Is that line generally forcing people away from ...a6 against the Austrian? I play the line from neither side, but was just curious.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Marcellus
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 95
Location: FL
Joined: 01/31/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #40 - 03/07/18 at 02:22:24
Post Tools
The pgns also contain commentary and aren't just bare game scores.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fjd
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #39 - 03/07/18 at 02:14:07
Post Tools
The PGNs are for sale separately, so no.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
VGA
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 97
Joined: 08/13/17
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #38 - 03/07/18 at 00:02:13
Post Tools
Can the pgns be shared or are they somehow copyrighted (huh?)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gwnn
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 472
Joined: 03/21/11
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #37 - 03/06/18 at 16:44:27
Post Tools
I have the DVD. It's great seeing Tiger talk about the opening. There's not a lot of theory, just some illustrative games and general ideas. The first 8/21 videos are on the Pirc vs the Austrian, mind you.

I checked the Hippo and the Averbakh sections. He shows some game(s) he's played recently, but doesn't show much in terms of theory or anything.

Most of the videos is Tiger trying to put into words what his general feelings about positions are. I love it. "Here I feel like the LSB is too strong." "Here Black is maybe a bit worse but he has play." "Generally I would hate to play Nb6 but here I liked it because of reason X." Simon Williams is there as a student, mostly, giving some opinions here and there. Sometimes Tiger strongly disagrees with him and Simon accepts. Maybe some of it is for didactic reasons.

edit: there's a bunch of .pgn's too. But I think mostly the selling point is having Tiger talk about his opening for 5 hours and 30 minutes.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bibs
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2342
Joined: 10/24/06
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #36 - 03/05/18 at 13:28:51
Post Tools
And made in a shed, no less. 

A toss up over the last year which would come first: Man City to the title, Trump (note: an inferior Pantone orange) impeached, or this arrives. 

And... The Original Orange One lands it. Carrot juice all round, and we raise our glasses. Cheers!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JEH
God Member
*****
Offline


"Football is like Chess,
only without the dice."

Posts: 1456
Location: Reading
Joined: 09/22/05
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #35 - 03/05/18 at 06:42:29
Post Tools
VGA wrote on 03/05/18 at 03:44:36:
the link


Tigers Modern/Double Tuition - New GingerGM DVD - Preview/Trailer...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tkJiToQcIM


  

Those who want to go by my perverse footsteps play such pawn structure with fuzzy atypical still strategic orientations

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middlegame with you
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
VGA
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 97
Joined: 08/13/17
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #34 - 03/05/18 at 03:44:36
Post Tools
fjd wrote on 02/19/18 at 06:45:22:
Yeah I dunno what's happening here - from what I can remember, it was GingerGM's "next" project since 2016.

Here is a preview GingerGM posted on his YT channel. He looks deadly serious, too!

EDIT: well I can't post the link but you can go to his channel, the name of the video of "Tigers Modern/ Double Tuition ..."
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fjd
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #33 - 02/19/18 at 06:45:22
Post Tools
Yeah I dunno what's happening here - from what I can remember, it was GingerGM's "next" project since 2016.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PatzerNoster
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 152
Joined: 10/22/09
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #32 - 02/18/18 at 15:37:49
Post Tools
Any news about this DVD?
Would be a shame if it didn't come out after having been recorded.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #31 - 07/06/17 at 17:03:43
Post Tools
Quote:
As Simon "GingerGM" Williams on several occasions mentioned, Tiger already recorded a complete DVD on the Modern in Williams' studio at the beginning of the year, which should be published any time soon!

I didn’t know about this -- thanks. Great news!

Further to the ‘missing’ Tiger line 5 Qd2 b5 6 f3 Nd7 7 h4, Black can of course here play (as well as 7 …h6) 7 …Ngf6 8 g4 h6 9 0-0-0 Nb6! with a transposition to the line already discussed. Furthermore, if instead he plays 7 …h5 and White replies 8 Nh3 (8 0-0-0 Bb7 9 Nh3 Rc8 is covered by Tiger), then as well as 8 …Bb7 (which I suppose T. is ‘implicitly’ giving since it transposes to three of his tabiyas after 9 0-0-0 Rc8 as above, or 9 Ng5 c6, or 9 a4 c6) Black can, as Lakdawala points out in his book, play 8 …Ngf6 9 Ng5 Nb6!?. Lakdawala gives here 10 b3 c6 11 Rd1 0-0 12 Ne2 Qc7 (Perez Candelario-Granda Zuniga) as OK for Black. I imagine 10 a4 c6!? is OK too, and ditto 10 0-0-0 e6!? as played by Chatalbashev since White isn’t going to get Bf1-h3 in. And just to add to Black’s possibilities, I notice too that Spraggett and others have played 7 …h5 8 Nh3 c5!?.

Flexible, or what! It seems really odd to me though that Tiger doesn’t mention the 6 h4 Nf6 7 f3 Nbd7 (or 6 f3 Nd7 7 h4 Ngf6) 8 g4 h6 9 0-0-0 Nb6!? plan, especially when the stem game features Seirawan as Black! (Lakdawala gives instead 9 Nh3 Nb6!?, as played, twice, by none other than Svidler!)

Meanwhile, can anyone answer for me this conundrum? In the second edition of his book, Tiger gives various reasons (and with varying degrees of emphasis) for now preferring 5 …b5 to 5 …Nd7 after 5 Qd2. (Lakdawala has the opposite preference.) On p. 187, Tiger gives as one reason that he likes “to be able to play a quick …Bb7 when White plays f2-f4, as shown in [his] Games 7-11”. He’s referring to the Austrian line where White plays an early Be3: namely, 4 f4 a6 5 Be3 b5 6 Bd3 Bb7 7 Nf3. Here Black often plays 7 …Nd7 but can also go 7 …Nf6!?. Tiger seems to regard both moves as fully playable and doesn’t suggest that the former is inferior to the latter. Since this is so, and since White doesn’t seem to have significant alternatives on moves 6 and 7, what exactly is the basis for Tiger’s dislike of 5 …Nd7? I’m especially curious since only in one place (p. 66, referring to Peptan-Stefanova) does T. comment on a 4 f4 a6 5 Be3 Austrian line that actually includes the move Qd1-d2 (which in any case he says is inferior to Qd1-e2!).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
picasso911
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Winning by pinning

Posts: 14
Joined: 06/19/17
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #30 - 07/05/17 at 12:02:47
Post Tools
CarriedbyGg wrote on 06/30/17 at 11:23:16:
To further complicate everything, as far as I have read the following idea was not mentioned before:

The Najdorf-esque Nd7-b6!
This idea was mentioned by Moskalenko in his book and is an interesting addition to the normal plans.


Agreed, the Nbd7-b6 followed by Nfd7-idea wasn't mentioned (and recommended) by Tiger, but it's a healthy idea in terms of Black's piece placement, in my opinion especially in the h4-h6-complex.

For example I like Black's position after

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5 6.f3 Nd7 7.0-0-0 Bb7 8.h4 h6 9.Nh3 Ngf6 10.g4 Nb6 11.Bd3 Nfd7 (voluntarily!) 12.Qf2 b4 13.Ne2 c5

Stigma wrote on 06/30/17 at 12:08:58:
...Nbd7-b6 is a well-known manoeuvre in the Pirc line 4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2 b5


Indeed, a line like

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2 b5 6.f3 Nbd7 7.g4 Nb6 8.h4 h5 9.g5 Nfd7 10.f4 b4 11.Nd1 c5

is quite similar to the Modern line above, so obiously the Pirc and Modern variations have several themes in common (in particular when Black finally played ...Ngf6, of course).

CarriedbyGg wrote on 06/30/17 at 11:23:16:
The beauty of these lines is that Black has different plans as his disposal.


In my eyes, this is a key point in the Modern Defence in general - its flexibily. Black's opportunity picking serveral themes, motifs and piece settings according to White's plans compensate for Black's limited space. Furthermore (as Suba already pointed out), move by move White has to reveal his intentions just before Black does. Playing the Modern with only one plan/system in mind cannot be correct, that's not the reason why it's called "Modern"! Wink

Michael Ayton wrote on 06/30/17 at 12:32:34:
I notice, in fact, that last year Tiger actually reached the position after 8 0-0-0 h6 by transposition! Hopefully this means that he now agrees with CarriedbyGg and was braced to meet 9 g4 with 9 ...Nb6! The point, I suppose, is not so much to ensure the completion of the ...Nd7-b6/...Nf6-d7 manoeuvre, because even with the inferior move-order Black can still carry this out, but that by avoiding a premature ...Bb7 as CarriedbyGg recommends, Black creates more telling counterplay -- he now possibly threatens both ...b4 and ...h5, so White can't really go 10 Kb1 and might have to fall back on something like 10 h5 g5 11 b3.


I'm learning here a lot!  Grin
Delaying ...Bb7 in order to get in a quick Nbd7-b6, "threatening" ..b4 & ...Nc4 in some positions indeed seems like a very good point.

Michael Ayton wrote on 06/30/17 at 12:32:34:
Backlund-Hillarp Persson went 7 ...h6 8 0-0-0 Nbd7 (0-1, 50). This seems a perfectly fine transpositional option since 8 g4 Nbd7 obviously transposes to 7 ...Nbd7 8 g4 h6.


Just for completion here's Tiger's pretty nice game.



As Simon "GingerGM" Williams on several occasions mentioned, Tiger already recorded a complete DVD on the Modern in Williams' studio at the beginning of the year, which should be published any time soon! Cheesy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #29 - 06/30/17 at 12:32:34
Post Tools
Quote:
I assume the ideas are roughly the same in this Modern case.

Sure. But personally I'm more concerned about a White Knight landing on g5 than I am a pawn. For that reason (and to try to answer my own question above!?), after 8 0-0-0 I think 8 ...h6! must be correct. (If 8 ...Bb7?! instead, hoping to transpose to Haubro-Tiger in Reply #23 above after 9 Nh3 h6, White goes 9 g4! and Black may have nothing better than 9 ...h6 transposing to the line Tiger 'would not bet' on being trustworthy.) 

I notice, in fact, that last year Tiger actually reached the position after 8 0-0-0 h6 by transposition!* Hopefully this means that he now agrees with CarriedbyGg and was braced to meet 9 g4 with 9 ...Nb6! The point, I suppose, is not so much to ensure the completion of the ...Nd7-b6/...Nf6-d7 manoeuvre, because even with the inferior move-order Black can still carry this out, but that by avoiding a premature ...Bb7 as CarriedbyGg recommends, Black creates more telling counterplay -- he now possibly threatens both ...b4 and ...h5, so White can't really go 10 Kb1 and might have to fall back on something like 10 h5 g5 11 b3. 

Continuing the theme of flexibility, it's worth noting that Black can also arrive at these positions from a [5 Qd2 b5] 6 h4 h6 move order! -- 7 0-0-0 Nd7 8 f3 Ngf6, or 7 f3 Nd7 8 0-0-0 Ngf6. In fact it looks as though 8 ...Ngf6 here scores well/best for Black. (Svidler has also played 8 ...Nb6 here. I never really know whether 9 d5 is an objection in such positions: can anyone say whether it's so, or whether d4-d5 would be stronger or weaker here than in the same position with g2-g4 and ...Ngf6 included?)


* Backlund-Hillarp Persson went 7 ...h6 8 0-0-0 Nbd7 (0-1, 50). This seems a perfectly fine transpositional option since 8 g4 Nbd7 obviously transposes to 7 ...Nbd7 8 g4 h6. Actually though, Tiger also played 7 ...Nbd7!? last year, against Quesada Perez, so the evidence mounts that he may now be of the same mind as CarriedbyGg. The game continued 9 Nh3 Nb6 10 g5 hg 11 Ng5 c6 12 0-0-0 b4 13 Nb1 a5, and although Black lost, this wasn't because of the opening.

« Last Edit: 07/01/17 at 10:45:56 by Michael Ayton »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stigma
God Member
*****
Offline


There is a crack in everything.

Posts: 3277
Joined: 11/07/06
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #28 - 06/30/17 at 12:08:58
Post Tools
...Nbd7-b6 is a well-known manoeuvre in the Pirc line 4.Be3 c6 5.Qd2 b5, which I used to play a lot. The main idea there is simply to give the knight on f6 a better retreat square than h5 or h7 if/when White kicks it with g4-g5. Though the knight on b6 also usefully covers d5 and might jump into a queenside attack on a4 or c4.

I assume the ideas are roughly the same in this Modern case. I'm probably just stating the obvious here. Smiley
  

Improvement begins at the edge of your comfort zone. -Jonathan Rowson
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #27 - 06/30/17 at 12:00:22
Post Tools
Quote:
The Najdorf-esque Nd7-b6!
This idea was mentioned by Moskalenko in his book and is an interesting addition to the normal plans.

Interesting. I haven't looked at this too closely and I must admit that in the past I've found all these ...Nf6 options very confusing. What's Black's plan here after 8 0-0-0?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CarriedbyGg
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 82
Joined: 02/06/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #26 - 06/30/17 at 11:23:16
Post Tools
To further complicate everything, as far as I have read the following idea was not mentioned before:

The Najdorf-esque Nd7-b6!
This idea was mentioned by Moskalenko in his book and is an interesting addition to the normal plans. It occurs for example in 



The idea is to delay h5 for a moment (as Nh5 already did discourage h5 for White), for example if White plays

8. Nh3 Bb7 then h5 will only be played after a white Nf4. 

On 

8. g4 black can play h6!? 9. 0-0-0 when 9. ... Nb6! was not mentioned by Tiger in his book (he only said he wouldn't bet that Bb7 is okay here). Now the Bc8 is still flexible and can be deployed on whatever diagonal is better for him.

The beauty of these lines is that Black has different plans as his disposal. I think it is important to not freak out if your opponent outsmarts you somehow and you can't chop off the knight on h3 with your bishop, position is still playable!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #25 - 06/30/17 at 09:01:43
Post Tools
Good point about move orders, yes! (In a sense that was one reason I mentioned 10 Bf4, just because Black has always to beware of allowing an immediate 'game-over' e4-e5!)

Maybe the Dominguez-Ponomariov setup is, for ordinary mortals, not too bad? I seem to recall Lakdawala in his book on the Modern citing with approval a similar game where Sulava (if I'm remembering right) was Black. I'd take Tiger's expertise over Lakdawala's any day of the week, but temperamentally Tiger always fearlessly chooses the super-sharpest options, which might not always be the best policy for a patzer like me! ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
picasso911
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Winning by pinning

Posts: 14
Joined: 06/19/17
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #24 - 06/29/17 at 18:26:44
Post Tools
Michael Ayton wrote on 06/27/17 at 13:42:49:
I do wish though that openings books in general were more cogently organised!


Agreed! After 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5 the following moves for White f3, 0-0-0 and h4 are interchangeable but not necessarily lead to the same "tabiya".

All these move-orders are very confusing (at least to me Grin ), especially since Tiger introduces his own move-order issues with Black in terms of 5...Nd7 vs. 5...Bb7.

Michael Ayton wrote on 06/27/17 at 13:42:49:
For example, in Chapter 3, Tiger comments rather differently on the same position in different places (4 Be3 a6 5 h4 Nf6 6 f3 b5 7 Qd2 h5 8 0-0-0 Bb7?! 9 Nh3 Nbd7 10 Ng5 e6: compare bottom right of p. 162 and bottom left of p. 176, where 11 Ne2 is called critical though the book’s first edition implies that 11 g3, which it seems has a big plus score, is actually best).


Well spotted! This indeed seems to be kind of an oversight.
After the critical 10...e6 11.g3!? Qe7 12.Bh3 Nb6 13.b3 Nfd7 14.Ne2 0-0-0!? (Dominguez - Ponomariov, 2014) Black might face a slight pressure. 

Michael Ayton wrote on 06/27/17 at 13:42:49:
Also (and of greater interest to me), the move orders 5 Qd2 b5 6 f3 Nd7 7 h4 h5 8 Nh3 Bb7 9 a4 and 9 Ng5 (9 0-0-0 Rc8 10 Ng5 c5! is the variation you mention, of course) are missing. After the former Black presumably should play 9 …c6 reaching page 158 after 10 Ng5 Ngf6 11 Be2 0-0, and after the latter perhaps 9 …c6 too, reaching page 156 after 10 0-0-0 Qc7! 11 Kb1 Ngf6.


After 6.f3 Nd7 7.h4 h5!? 8.Nh3 Bb7 9.Ng5 Black also can play a 9...Ngf6 10.0-0-0 e6, transposing to the lines discussed above (they might not be the best though). Noteworthy, 10.0-0-0 c6? allows the thematic 11.e5! and Black already is in trouble. These move-order-errors have to be avoided!
After 9...c6 White of course isn't oblige to play 10.0-0-0 as well as 11.Kb1 (which tanspose), although it seems quite sensible.

Michael Ayton wrote on 06/27/17 at 13:42:49:
In addition, in the ‘waiting game’ variation that you mention, given on p. 163 (6 h4 Nf6! 7 f3 h5 8 0-0-0 c6 9 Kb1! Qc7!), I think the sharp 10 Bf4!? should have been analysed, even if 10 …b4 is OK for Black.


Of course, in a repertoire book you cannot really take every normal move into account and the Bf4-idea appears quite seldom in these type of positions, although it's logical. After 10.Bf4 b4 (10...Be6!? was played once by Sethuraman) 11.Na4 a5 12.Bc4 Ba6 Black seemingly is doing well.

And thank you for listing a few model games for the quite different ..h6-setup, I included some lines in my notes, waiting for the chance testing them!  Wink

Very intriguing discussion!  Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #23 - 06/28/17 at 23:33:28
Post Tools
Quote:
The alternative (and maybe more risky) setup against White's h4 is ...h6, intending to meet h4-h5 with ...g5, however creating a hole on f5 (as ...e6 usually weakens d6 a bit too much) and a potential pawn-break in f4.

Maybe it’s a personal thing, but I myself think of the …h6 lines as less risky than the …h5 ones, partly ’cos I’m scared of that Ng5 and partly ’cos I reckon plans with f2–f4 are not likely to be White’s strongest. Tiger’s book touches on …h6 lines rather than analysing them exhaustively and I think you have to extrapolate a bit from what he says to achieve a complete ‘repertoire’, but maybe the games below sum up the key lines? As usual the possible transpositions are legion, so I’ve tweaked the move orders (grouping them all under 6 h4 h6) to present the lines mentioned as clearly as possible.

What is White's strongest line against [6] ...h6? I've seen it implicitly suggested that it might be the line played in the daft game Hoehne–Winbush, but maybe that's unlikely? Anyway,  I look forward to comments/thoughts!

*****

Haubro–Tiger

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 b5 6. h4 h6 7. O-O-O Nd7 8. f3 Bb7 9. Nh3 Ngf6 10. Kb1 [Also 10. g4, 10. Nf4, 10. Nf2] Nb6 11. g4 b4 12. Ne2 Nc4 13. Qc1 Nd7 14. Bf2 a5 15. Ng3 Ndb6 16. h5 g5 17. Nf5 Bf8 18. d5 c5 19. f4 f6 20. Ne3 Ne3 21. Qe3 Bg7 22. Bb5 Kf7 23. Rdf1 Kg8 24. f5 a4 25. Rc1 Kh7 26. a3 ba3 27. Qa3 Nd7 28. Bd7 Qd7 29. Rhd1 Rhb8 30. c4 Ba6 31. Rd3 Rb4 32. Rdc3 Rab8 33. Ng1 e6 34. Nf3 ed5 35. ed5 Qe7 36. Re1 Qb7 37. Rc2 Rb3 38. Qa4 Rf3 39. Re6 Rb3 40. Rd6 Rb2 41. Kc1 Rc2 42. Qc2 Bc4 0-1



Either … De Costa–Van de Berkmortel

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 b5 6. h4 h6 7. 0-0-0 Nd7 8. f3 Bb7 9. g4 e6 10. Nh3 Ne7 11. Nf2 Qb8 12. Kb1 b4 13. Ne2 a5 14. c4 Ba6 15. Nc1 Nb6 16. b3 a4 17. c5 Nd7 18. Bxa6 Rxa6 19. Nfd3 Nc6 20. d5 Bc3 21. Qe2 Ne7 22. dxe6 fxe6 23. Nf4 Rc6 24. cxd6 cxd6 25. Nxe6 axb3 26. Nxb3 Ne5 27. Nbd4 Rc8 28. Qb5+ Kf7 29. Qxb8 Rxb8 30. Rhf1 Nc4 31. Bc1 Na3+ 32. Bxa3 bxa3+ 33. Kc2 Rhc8 34. Kd3 Rb2 35. Rc1 Rd2+ 36. Ke3 Rxa2 37. Rfd1 Rb2 38. Kd3 a2 0-1



Or Del Valle Corera–Kleiman

1 e4 g6 2 d4 Bg7 3 Nc3 d6 4 Be3 a6 5 Qd2 b5 6 h4 h6 7 0-0-0 Nd7 8 f3 Bb7 9 g4 c5 10 Nge2 Rc8 11 dc Nc5 12 Nf4 Qa5 13 Nfd5 b4 14 Nb1 Qa2 15 Qb4 Bd5 16 ed Nf6 17 Bc5 Rc5 18 Qb8 Kd7 19 Qb7 Rc7 20 Qa6 Ra8 21 Bb5 Kd8 22 Qa2 Ra2 23 Nc3 Ra5 24 Be2 Nd7 25 Kd2 Bc3 26 bc Rd5 27 Bd3 Ne5 28 Rhf1 Rdc5 29 Ra1 Kd7 30 h5 g5 31 Bf5 e6 32 Bd3 Rc3 33 f4 gf 34 Rf4 Ke7 35 Raf1 Ra3 36 Rb4 Ra8 37 Rbf4 Rg8 38 Be2 Rg5 39 c3 Ra7 40 Bd1 Ra2 41 Kc1 Rg2 42 c4 Nd3 43 Kb1 Rb2 44 Ka1 Ra5 0-1 



Hoehne–Winbush

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 b5 6. h4 h6 7. O-O-O Nd7 8. f3 Bb7 9. h5 g5 10. Nge2!? c5!? [Why not?] 11. dc Nc5? 12. Nd4 Qa5? 13. Nf5 Bc3 14. Qc3 Qc3 15. bc Nd7 16. c4 1-0



Ohlssen–Tiger

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5 6.h4 h6 7 0-0-0 Nd7 8.f4 h5! 9.Nf3 c6! 10.Bd3 Nb6 11.Ne2 [11 f5(!) gf 12 ef Nc4 ∞] Nf6 12.Ng3 d5 13.e5 Ng4 14.Bg1 Nc4 15.Qe1 Nh6 16.b3 Nb6 17.Be3 Bg4 18.Bd2 e6 19.Ba5 Bf8 20.Qf2 Qc7 21.Nf1 Rb8 22.Ne3 c5 23.Nxg4 Nxg4 24.Qg1 c4 25.Be2 Qe7 26.Bc3 Qa3+ 27.Kb1 Na4 28.Ba1 Bb4 29.Nd2 Nc3+ 0-1



Hamdouchi–Bricard

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 b5 6. h4 h6 7. O-O-O Nd7 8. f4 h5! 9. Bd3 Nh6! 10. Nf3 c6 11. f5 gxf5 12. exf5 Nf6 13. Bxh6 Bxh6 14. Ng5 Qb6 15. Qf4 Kf8 16. Qf3 Qxd4 17. Bxb5 Qb6 18. Bxc6 Rb8 19. b3 Bxf5 20. Qxf5 Qxc6 21. Nd5 Rb5 22. c4 Rxd5 23. Rxd5 Bxg5+ 24. hxg5 Nxd5 25. Rf1 f6 26. Qxd5 Qxd5 27. cxd5 Rg8 28. gxf6 Rxg2 29. a4 Rg5 30. fxe7+ Kxe7 31. Rd1 h4 32. Kc2 h3 33. Kc3 Rg4 34. b4 Rh4 35. a5 Kf6 36. b5 axb5 37. a6 Ke5 38. Ra1 Rh8 39. a7 h2 40. Kb4 Kxd5 41. Kxb5 Ke4 42. Rh1 Ra8 43. Kb6 d5 44. Rxh2 d4 45. Kb7 Rxa7+ 46. Kxa7 d3 47. Kb6 Ke3 48. Rh3+ Ke2 49. Kc5 d2 50. Rh2+ Kd3 51. Rxd2+ 1/2-1/2



Jacimovic–Sevo

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 b5 6. h4 h6 7. h5 g5 8. f4 gxf4 9. Bxf4 Bb7 10. 0-0-0 Nd7 11. Nf3 c5 12. Nd5 Ngf6 1/2-1/2


« Last Edit: 06/29/17 at 00:37:11 by Michael Ayton »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #22 - 06/27/17 at 13:42:49
Post Tools
Quote:
This little analysis mainly refers to Tigers book (p.151-201), which not only is a great theoretical work, but contains a huge collection of interesting lines and a bunch of inspiring ideas … by posting this analysis I still learned a lot about the move-order-trickeries …

The Modern Tiger is a fascinating work whether you play the Modern or not! – full of insights some of which have application to other openings as well (not least the Pirc, which of course is partly covered). I do wish though that openings books in general were more cogently organised! For example, in Chapter 3, Tiger comments rather differently on the same position in different places (4 Be3 a6 5 h4 Nf6 6 f3 b5 7 Qd2 h5 8 0-0-0 Bb7?! 9 Nh3 Nbd7 10 Ng5 e6: compare bottom right of p. 162 and bottom left of p. 176, where 11 Ne2 is called critical though the book’s first edition implies that 11 g3, which it seems has a big plus score, is actually best).

Also (and of greater interest to me), the move orders 5 Qd2 b5 6 f3 Nd7 7 h4 h5 8 Nh3 Bb7 9 a4 and 9 Ng5 (9 0-0-0 Rc8 10 Ng5 c5! is the variation you mention, of course) are missing.* After the former Black presumably should play 9 …c6 reaching page 158 after 10 Ng5 Ngf6 11 Be2 0-0, and after the latter perhaps 9 …c6 too, reaching page 156 after 10 0-0-0 Qc7! 11 Kb1 Ngf6. But here I notice that Nigel Short and others have played 9 …c5!? and so I wondered what happens after 10 a4 – is the idea the pawn sac 10 …Bd4 11 Bd4 cd 12 Qd4 Ngf6 13 ab ab? Anyway, I don’t understand why openings-book authors, before writing a specific chapter, don’t draw up (and print in the book) a simple flow-chart of all the pertinent move-transpositions, surely a simple enough matter when there’s software to assist. Apologies to all who know I’ve been banging on about this for years!


* In addition, in the ‘waiting game’ variation that you mention, given on p. 163 (6 h4 Nf6! 7 f3 h5 8 0-0-0 c6 9 Kb1! Qc7!), I think the sharp 10 Bf4!? should have been analysed, even if 10 …b4 is OK for Black.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
picasso911
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Winning by pinning

Posts: 14
Joined: 06/19/17
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #21 - 06/26/17 at 18:10:03
Post Tools
fling wrote on 03/13/17 at 18:43:58:
RdC wrote on 03/11/17 at 23:01:13:
John Nunn, author of a book or two on the Modern is playing again in UK weekend tournaments. Here's how he met the Modern Tiger in this weekend's tournament in Exeter.

1. e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Be3 a6 5. h4

This provoked the response 5. .. h5 whereupon Nh3 was played, followed up by Ng5, f3 and O-O-O. Later the regrouping Nc3-e2-f4 was played, putting a lot of pressure on e6 ( which was occupied by a pawn).


From what I have experienced and learned from similar positions (I don't play this set-up, but often ...g6 against the English), ...h5 is many times the least desired option for Black. I'd rather go ...h6, or something else, especially now when White has not played Qd2 (no Bh6 yet). If White has played Qd2, then ...h5 could be an option I guess. What does Tiger recommend?


The whole 4.Be3 business probably is - besides the infamous Austrian - the most dangerous and concurrently most interesting option for White against the Modern and the Pirc in particular.
Personally, 4.Be3 persuaded me to switch from the classical Pirc move-order to the more flexibel Modern move-order.

In the Modern Tiger, Persson adresses this setup on about 100 pages, mainly White playing the more dangerous f3 ("flexible dragon unleashed") and the more solid Nf3 ("flexible dragon restrained").

Before taking 5.h4 into account, it seems sensible to analyse the really popular "starting position" of this system after the following moves:

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5

White's typicalplan generally include f3, 0-0-0, h4, Nh3-g5 and crushing Black on the Kingside or in the center with a timely e5-Break.
Black's typical ideas are Bb7, Nd7, c(6-)5, Qc7, sometimes Rc8 and Ngf6 as well and crushing White on the Queenside without allowing too much Counterplay on his own king.
Because of his limited influence in the center it seems that Black has to react more carefully to White's play than the other way around.

Having said this, a very important idea against White's h4 followed by the annoying Nh3-g5 (if Black plays ...h5) is simply to knock out the Knight with ...Bxh3 as soon as possible.
So, after 6.h4 Black shouldn't play the automatic 6...h5?! as 7.Nf3! secures White the possibiliy of playing Ng5 and putting pressure on Blacks kingside.
Instead, Black should react 6...Ngf6, attacking e4 and more or less forcing 7.f3 as White wants to play this move anyway. Only now Black plays 7...h5! since Nf3 is no longer an option.
After 8.0-0-0 (part of White's plan) Black has to adjust his play a little bit, since his normal moves 8...Bb7 as well as 8...Nd7 allow the critical 9.Nh3 in turn. So Tiger recommends 8...c6! as half a waiting move preparing ...Qc7, after which play may continue 9.Kb1 (9.Nh3 Bxh3 10.Rxh3 Nbd7 and Black could execute his idea) 9...Qc7 10.e5 Nd5 11.f4 Nxc3+ 12.Qxc3 0-0 with roughly equal play.

In view of this, White may play 6.0-0-0 first, since Black's normal moves 6...Nd7 and 6...Bb7 both allow 7.Nh3. Although the sophisticated 6...c6!? is playable, Tiger recommends the much more natural sequence:

6.0-0-0 Bb7 7.f3 Nd7 8.h4 h5 9.Nh3 Rc8!?

In this move-order Black cannot really avoid facing a white Knight on g5, but in particular for the Ne2-f4-maneuver he seems to be better prepared as the following line shows:

10.Ng5 c5 11.Ne2 Qc7 12.Kb1 Ngf6 13.d5
(13.g3 with the idea Bh3 is met by 13...cxd4 14.Nxd4 Ne5 as well as 13.Nf4? runs into the typical tactic 13...cxd4 14.Bxd4 e5!)
13...Ne5 14.Nf4 Qb6 (avoiding any fork on e6) and White's play seems a little bit stuck at the moment when Black may rush is queenside pawns.

Having said all this, after the immediate 5.h4 Black should play 5...Nf6! similar to the variations above since 6.Qd2 b5 transposes.

The alternative (and maybe more risky) setup against White's h4 is ...h6, intending to meet h4-h5 with ...g5, however creating a hole on f5 (as ...e6 usually weakens d6 a bit too much) and a potential pawn-break in f4.
Nevertheless, if White postpones long castling and plays with a quick g4, Black sometimes should employ the ..h6 plan as a sample line may show:

1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5 6.f3 Nd7 7.g4!? Bb7 8.Nge2
(Noteworthy the clumsy 8.h4?! is strongly met by 8...h5! [here it works!] 9.gxh5 Rxh5 10.Nge2 Bf6 11.Bf2 e5 and Black is fine.)
8...c5 9.h4
(9.dxc5 Ne5! eyeballing f3 as well as c4 is level.)
9...h6
(Now 9...h5 dosn't work as well as previously since 10.gxh5 Rxh5 11.Ng3 Rh7 12.h5 is good for White.)
10.Ng3 Qc7
(10...e6 is a safer option but not everybody's taste.)
11.h5 d5! 12.Bf4 e5! and Black unleashes his forces.

Summed up, Black shouldn't play ...h5 light-hearted, but sometimes it's a necessity to stop White's immediate kingside-play. Moreover, Black always should keep his ...Bxh3-idea in mind, sometimes even by delaying ...Bb7 or ...Nd7 with ...c6.
If White plays g4 in preperation for h4, Black can employ his second weapon with ...h6 followed by ...g5, but since this creates static weaknesses, Black should play energetically.

This little analysis mainly refers to Tigers book (p.151-201), which not only is a great theoretical work, but contains a huge collection of interesting lines and a bunch of inspiring ideas.

Hopefully that helped (as it helped myself - by posting this analysis I still learned a lot about the move-order-trickeries)!  Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #20 - 03/13/17 at 18:43:58
Post Tools
RdC wrote on 03/11/17 at 23:01:13:
John Nunn, author of a book or two on the Modern is playing again in UK weekend tournaments. Here's how he met the Modern Tiger in this weekend's tournament in Exeter.

1. e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Be3 a6 5. h4

This provoked the response 5. .. h5 whereupon Nh3 was played, followed up by Ng5, f3 and O-O-O. Later the regrouping Nc3-e2-f4 was played, putting a lot of pressure on e6 ( which was occupied by a pawn).


From what I have experienced and learned from similar positions (I don't play this set-up, but often ...g6 against the English), ...h5 is many times the least desired option for Black. I'd rather go ...h6, or something else, especially now when White has not played Qd2 (no Bh6 yet). If White has played Qd2, then ...h5 could be an option I guess. What does Tiger recommend?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fjd
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 551
Location: Ottawa
Joined: 09/22/16
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #19 - 03/13/17 at 17:15:39
Post Tools
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #18 - 03/12/17 at 23:57:16
Post Tools
RdC wrote on 03/11/17 at 23:01:13:
John Nunn, author of a book or two on the Modern is playing again in UK weekend tournaments. Here's how he met the Modern Tiger in this weekend's tournament in Exeter.

1. e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Be3 a6 5. h4

This provoked the response 5. .. h5 whereupon Nh3 was played, followed up by Ng5, f3 and O-O-O. Later the regrouping Nc3-e2-f4 was played, putting a lot of pressure on e6 ( which was occupied by a pawn).


Irrelevant observation:  Dr. N keeps a neat scoresheet.  (From looking at other rounds, it is evident that the second one for that game [sixth one in the file] is his.)
https://eastdevonchesscongress.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/r2-open.pdf
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 868
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #17 - 03/11/17 at 23:01:13
Post Tools
John Nunn, author of a book or two on the Modern is playing again in UK weekend tournaments. Here's how he met the Modern Tiger in this weekend's tournament in Exeter.

1. e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Be3 a6 5. h4

This provoked the response 5. .. h5 whereupon Nh3 was played, followed up by Ng5, f3 and O-O-O. Later the regrouping Nc3-e2-f4 was played, putting a lot of pressure on e6 ( which was occupied by a pawn).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Confused_by_Theory
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 662
Location: Europe
Joined: 05/13/15
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #16 - 01/24/17 at 10:59:35
Post Tools
Hi.

Fighting games. Was very enjoyable to go through both Smiley.

Have a nice day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 106
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #15 - 01/23/17 at 11:45:40
Post Tools
Ooops, sorry. The first game is the following: http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=109270 where I played black against FM Strange. The second game is the same: http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=109327
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paul Brondal
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 106
Location: Denmark
Joined: 05/20/14
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #14 - 01/18/17 at 12:19:13
Post Tools
I really love his book. My last 2 games with the black pieces have been the Hippo. I hope that it is OK including them here.

In the first game, the white player has an ELO just above 2400: http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=109271

In the above game, white has a won position around move 45 and black has a won position around move 60. It was really a tough game because we had 90 minutes + 30s per move for the entire game and the last 50 moves were played with very little time left.

In the second game, the white player had 2250: 

http://www.chessvideos.tv/chess-game-replayer.php?id=109327

The place where white blunders the exchange he is virtually down to 30 s per move. This was played in the Danish division league.

I will definitely continue to have the Modern as a surprise weapon. Tiger's book is truly inspiring I find.
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 965
Location: Manchester
Joined: 01/10/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #13 - 08/13/16 at 20:31:59
Post Tools
Tiger Hillarp has added some more Modern Defence annotations at his blog
http://tiger.bagofcats.net/
following his recent exhibition match at 15 minutes +5 seconds vs. Morozevich.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #12 - 07/21/16 at 23:10:22
Post Tools
Many thanks for this! I should have known to look there. Love the annotation to Black's seventh!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 965
Location: Manchester
Joined: 01/10/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #11 - 07/21/16 at 22:49:47
Post Tools

Tiger has commented on the recent Wei Yi-Carlsen game (Bilbao) at
http://tiger.bagofcats.net/


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #10 - 03/18/15 at 05:25:40
Post Tools
TN wrote on 03/17/15 at 22:08:47:

The big question in my mind is what Tiger gives against 4.f4 a6 5.Nf3 b5 6.Bd3 Nd7 7.a4 which was one of his main recommendations to White in his first book.


Hillarp Persson still thinks this line is dangerous for Black and therefore gives 4 (!) options he considers playable.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #9 - 03/17/15 at 22:08:47
Post Tools
The final position in line 2 isn't an issue after 9...Qc7 followed by the queenside pawn storm, but White could improve earlier with 8.h3!. Fortunately 5...Nxe4 is probably a simpler route to equality, and a good argument in favour of starting with 5.Qe2. In line 1, just play 6...Nf6 when it doesn't make much sense for White to castle kingside, but queenside castling also feels strange in conjunction with Be2/Nf3. 

For what it's worth, 4...Nf6 is a pretty logical choice after 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be2 (as it's bascially your only good option after 3.Nf3 d6 4.Be2) and then 5.g4 d5! and 5.h4 c5 6.d5 h5 are both quite fine for Black, in my view as White doesn't really get his attack going in either case. 

The big question in my mind is what Tiger gives against 4.f4 a6 5.Nf3 b5 6.Bd3 Nd7 7.a4 which was one of his main recommendations to White in his first book. Perhaps he's suggesting the 4...Nf6 Pirc transposition this time but I'm not convinced by Black's prospects for equality there either.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
parisestmagique
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 473
Location: paris
Joined: 01/24/06
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #8 - 03/16/15 at 13:07:20
Post Tools
Very interesting book but after the last two modern games i played with black i did not found analysis : 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4.Be2!? a6 (after Nf6 transposition in the Pirc 5.h4!? or 6.g4!?) 5.h4!? h5 6.Cf3 b5 7.Ng5 and 1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.Nc3 0-0 6.Qe2!? ç6 7.Bb3 Bg4 8.Be3 Nbd7 9.000 In both case it seems to me the game is original and maybe better for White.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #7 - 01/06/15 at 09:29:17
Post Tools
I'm working on it! Cheesy

But seriously, will attempt a more limited post soon! (Maybe not too bad a thing to do while sitting here nursing a tedious post-Christmas bug, blast it ...)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TonyRo
God Member
*****
Offline


I'm gonna crack your skull!

Posts: 1846
Location: Cleveland, OH
Joined: 11/26/07
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #6 - 01/06/15 at 07:22:32
Post Tools
Michael Ayton wrote on 01/05/15 at 21:25:29:


(At the moment I' don't really see why a 1 e4 g6 2 d4 d6!? move order doesn't give Black valuable alternative options, but that's really for another thread ...)



Perhaps it's time for another one of your world-famous, giant Word documents with a complicated list of transpositional possibilities and tabiyas. I enjoyed the first one immensely!

Grin Cheesy Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #5 - 01/05/15 at 21:25:29
Post Tools
Look forward to hearing your impressions! I get the feeling that both 4 f4 a6 and 4 Be3 a6 are thought to be tough for Black these days -- it'll be really interesting to learn if Tiger thinks they're OK. (At the moment I' don't really see why a 1 e4 g6 2 d4 d6!? move order doesn't give Black valuable alternative options, but that's really for another thread ...)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TonyRo
God Member
*****
Offline


I'm gonna crack your skull!

Posts: 1846
Location: Cleveland, OH
Joined: 11/26/07
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #4 - 01/05/15 at 20:39:35
Post Tools
My copy is on the way, I'll have it in a few days!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1976
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #3 - 01/05/15 at 20:37:23
Post Tools
Has anyone got/seen this book beyond the online sample?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
moahunter
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 59
Joined: 05/10/09
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #2 - 07/07/13 at 01:46:46
Post Tools
I'd love to see a stronger solution to an early c4 by white (if one exists, outside of a KID transposition).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Hadron
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline


Doctor, Doctor, Doctor..When
will you ever learn?

Posts: 195
Location: Levin, New Zealand.
Joined: 03/24/05
Gender: Male
Re: The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
Reply #1 - 06/23/13 at 11:36:43
Post Tools
Moved as requested.
Smiley
  

I'm reminded again of something Short wrote recently, approximately "The biggest fallacy in chess is the quasi-religious belief in the primacy of the opening."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GabrielGale
Senior Member
****
Offline


Who was Thursday?

Posts: 471
Location: Sydney
Joined: 02/28/08
Gender: Male
The Modern Tiger (Tiger's Modern 2 ed)
06/11/13 at 11:51:47
Post Tools
The Master has spoken:
Quote:
I am currently in the process of writing the second edition of “Tiger’s Modern” (that will be called “The Modern Tiger”) and will try to post twice a week during that time. Please bear with me
.
Tiger has a new blog: http://tiger.bagofcats.net
Do we want to start a discussion on what we would like to see in the new edition?

My apologies. This should be in 1 e4 ... Can a moderator transfer? Much obliged.
  

http://www.toutautre.blogspot.com/
A Year With Nessie ...... aka GM John Shaw's The King's Gambit (http://thekinggambit.blogspot.com.au/)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo