I got my copy of The Modern Bogo 4days ago.
I tried to search a particular line and found a note "for xyz see below" I eventually found the line having read through 13 pages, of variations, and 5 further referrals to the same "note below".
This is the most badly written chess opening book that I have ever tried to read. It is unusable.
With freight it cost me around $40. I will happily sell to anyone within Australia for $10.
Utter rubbish.

My copy arrived today! It's very interesting, full of usual ideas. Even the typesetting has improved greatly from their previous effort (The Modern French) where I thought it was often difficult to distinguish the main lines in bold from the notes and subvariations. It all seemed to merge into one. But anyway, its not a problem in this new book, which I was pleased to see.

There are numerous transpositions back into the regular Bogo, as well as some Queen's Indian and even Nimzo-Indian lines (1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ 3.Nc3 c5 4.Nf3 and now they recommend 4...Nf6, but give a separate chapter on things like 4...d5 etc).

For those wondering about the contents, New in Chess have put up the contents on their site - http://www.newinchess.com/The_Modern_Bogo_1_d4_e6-p-997.html. I particularly like the idea of separating the index of variations into two parts - 'lines with ...Nf6' and 'lines without ...Nf6'.

Overall, recommended. I'm not saying the positions are especially easy to handle as you have to be familiar with many different structures. But as a complete reference on 2...Bb4+, it'll stand the test of time.

The only thing I can really think of is 2...Nf6 intending 3.c4 Bb4+, but that would mean Black would have to play an early ...Nf6 in the 2.c4 Bb4+ line

Maybe it's just wishful thinking to hope for something more practical to exist than 2...c5, idk

I really hope the authors will have something else up their sleeve after 2.Nf3 other than Eingorn's 2...c5, allowing 3.e4!?

http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Bogo-1-d4-e6-Complete/dp/9056914952/ref=sr_sp-atf_t...

Since the book starts with 1.d4 it seems that the authors have decided not to include flank openings. There were some discussions here about the Eingorn suggestions there and as far as I could tell, the problems of making a full 1...e6 repertoire was not solved. I wonder if 1.e4 is included in the fortcoming book or if they refer to their book on the French.