TopNotch wrote on 03/29/14 at 18:47:11:
[quote author=4F4D5F4F495F280 link=1393552694/207#207 date=1396115113]Of course, biased indians will disagree, but for chess a match like Carlsen - Kramnik/Aronian would be more interesting.
Strange as it may seem to you, but of all the players in this field, the one that will probaly give the most interesting match to Carlsen actually won the tournament. As for being better for chess, what is more intriguing than a well earned re-match.
It's not about deserving a shot, it's about earning a shot. Nakamura deserves a shot, Carauana deserves a shot, Ding Liren will probably eventually deserve a shot, etc, but ultimately there can be only one challenger. Gracefully accept it, live with it and stop moaning about it, and no, I am not Indian.
Topper [/quote
Anand is obviously the winner of this candidate.
Was it expected?
Well, actually no one bet on Anand, except of biased indians, @topnotch and all smart alecs, who always can be found on the winner side.
.
Why do you keep prefacing the word Indians with the word Biased?