Quote:

True, the Hubsch line gives black an advantage if white tries to play the BDG.  However, I think someone who plays 1.d4 d5 would already have a killer line prepared for a BDG that commonly starts this way:  1.d4 d5 2.e4 de4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 fe4, etc.  Although the Hubsch line is good, it would require a 1.d4 d5 player to know two ways to deal with an attempted, or actual BDG: one way for 2.e4 and another way for 2.Nc3.

- Lost Highway

Generally BDGers tend to play 3.Be3 against the French followed by Nd2 and f3, but I consider it to be an inferior version (but still unclear, even if I would prefer the Black side) of the BDG. Personnally I continue with 3.Nc3 but I like to play the French advance sometimes. A BDGer is practically forced to know how to play the normal 3.Nc3 because of the move order 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 (one of the 2 ways to play a BDG with 2.f3)..d5 3.e4 e6 and here I play both 4.e5 and 4.Bg5, but theses times I like to play the Anand/Shirov variation with 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Nce2. Against the Winawer (only available with the move order 1.d4 d5 e4 e6 where both color have more choices) I can play the normal theory, but I like to play sometimes  3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3!? Bxc3 5.bxc3 dxe4 6.f3!? (6.Qg4 is more standard here and is (=), but the text move 6.f3 is more in the spirit of the BDG, this is the Winckelmann-Reimer gambit), it could be not totally sound (somes guys will say the BDG is not sound either, but of course no one proved the contrary) but that's quite fun to play, with good practical chances.

I know that Leisebein plays the Winckelmann-Reimer Gambit, and the Alapin-Diemer gambit in CC with correct results, but he can also play the normal French theory, depending of the moves order

In practical play 2...e6 is a very good reply to the BDG, as a lot of BDG players will reply with the ridiculous 3.Be3?, after which 3...dxe4 is already clear advantage to Black (while 2...dxe4 3.Nc3 e5 or 3...Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 in my opinion is roughly equal).

Arkhein,

Why do you attack poor, defenseless guests like that?  You could have simply acknowledged that White can play the French which is under a bit of a cloud at the highest levels right now. 

All White has to do in that case is the opposite of what most BDGers want to do and actually take the advice of GMs and play the best lines!!!

1.d4 d5 2.e4 e6!

I'm getting dizzy.    What line are we looking at now?

Quote:


It's depressing to hear people say this.  It sounds like chess is dying.   

Scholar, who are you talking about?  

Smyslov Fan, that's one reason I sympathize with BDG players who want to show that the BDG is playable.  I certainly agree with them that many people provide unconvincing refutations, but I would really just rather play Black.  

Just imagine the resources they would find if they spent all that energy on a more fruitful opening.  It appears that Tekyo is discovering this.