It seems to me that the pawn structure requires less understanding to maintain early on, IMO, in the Stonewall. The themes are very playable, and Black has a good grip of the center. The developments are easy to play, just understanding when it is appropriate to enter into which plan, but a bit of study makes that pretty easy. As a matter of fact, without any Stonewall understanding, I came up with an initial tabiya for Black to try for with the typical c6-d5-e6-f5 pawn structure, KB on d6, KN on f6, 0-0, QN on d7, then b6-Bb7, Qc7, and finally Rae8. I showed this idea to Nigel Short via Myspace or Facebook, and he said it was in fact a typical plan, except that the queen should instead be on e7, as the opening of the c-file could be harmful to Black. But the ideas are easy and lucid - Black creates tension upon both the c5 and e5 squares, and has a solid position that White has to contend with. I think this is pretty easy to play. The Classical, on the other hand, is a different critter, and takes more understanding of the themes to play. Black's counterattack comes swiftly, and the pawns definitely flow towards the kingside. And playing e5 at the wrong time can be wrong for Black as well. And me personally, I don't like the early ...Qh5 themes for Black - maybe I don't yet understand them enough myself, but it seems too early. I think the Classical requires more understanding. I would like to hear your take on the two positions, if you don't mind - maybe you could give me some ideas to work with!
|