Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 43
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) The Tarrasch in Black and White (Read 50890 times)
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #132 - 03/31/10 at 12:36:36
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 03/31/10 at 12:03:42:
13.Bf4 Qa5 is equal and it is not so difficult to spot the improvement for Black a few moves later.


I'm not arguing it's not equal, just pointing out that 13. Bf4 Qa5 = cannot be attributed to Grivas.

I'm going to assume the improvement is 14...Qa6, since black appears fine afterwards.

Quote:

In the 17. Bxa8 cxd4 18. exd4 Bxd4 19. Be4 line 19...Bxc3! is an improvement and i and almost convinced that Black has a slight advantage if he finds the correct piece placement (Bc5-Qe5 if i remember correctly) and start pushing the h pawn.


It'd be hard to believe that black is slightly better there, but it's clear he has compensation.

It's not even clear white really has anything after 19...Qxc3 anyway, so I'm honestly not that interested in 16. Qc2. 

I honestly think the two moves Grivas dismisses as equal (14. Na4, 16. Rc1) are better tries. At least with those two white can try to improve, unlike with 16. Qc2.

One sample line I've looked at is 14. Na4 Rb8 (! - Grivas) 15. e3 Rb4 and now the simple 16. Rc1 (instead of the 16. Nc5 that Grivas mentions, which is equal) looks somewhere between += and = to me.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #131 - 03/31/10 at 12:03:42
Post Tools
13.Bf4 Qa5 is equal and it is not so difficult to spot the improvement for Black a few moves later.

In the 17. Bxa8 cxd4 18. exd4 Bxd4 19. Be4 line 19...Bxc3! is an improvement and i and almost convinced that Black has a slight advantage if he finds the correct piece placement (Bc5-Qe5 if i remember correctly) and start pushing the h pawn.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #130 - 03/31/10 at 09:06:26
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 03/30/10 at 22:23:59:
Yes, i also would like to know what is the line in which Black's play has been improved over Shardorff's analysis.

I'll give you something to consider in the 11...h6 line:

11.b3 h6 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.Bxf6
(13.Bf4 Qa5!=, Grivas) 
13...Bxf6 14.bxc4! 
(14.Na4 Rb8!=, Grivas) 
14...dxc4 15.e3 Qa5! 16.Qc2
(16.Rc1 Rac8!=, Grivas)  
[b]and now 16...c5![/b]
gives Black an equal game at least!

This ...h6 line is a great practical weapon because it can be used against 11.Nxc6 and against 11.b3 move order because White canot avoid the exchange on c6 if he wants to fight for an opening advantage.


I immediately notice that Grivas' analysis in CBM 120 doesn't actually give 13. Bf4 Qa5 as equal, in fact his main reason for not liking it as much appears to be related to the fact that the resulting += should be drawn with accurate defense, at some point making a comment that improvements are probably possible for both sides.

Grivas also analyzes your 16...c5, so I'm guessing your improvement that equalizes black occurs somewhere later, or you evaluate the resulting position after 17. Bxa8 cxd4 18. exd4 Bxd4 19. Be4 Qxc3 20. Qxc3 Bxc3 21. Rab1 (+=, Grivas) differently.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #129 - 03/30/10 at 22:23:59
Post Tools
Yes, i also would like to know what is the line in which Black's play has been improved over Shardorff's analysis.

I'll give you something to consider in the 11...h6 line:

11.b3 h6 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.Bxf6
(13.Bf4 Qa5!=, Grivas) 
13...Bxf6 14.bxc4! 
(14.Na4 Rb8!=, Grivas) 
14...dxc4 15.e3 Qa5! 16.Qc2
(16.Rc1 Rac8!=, Grivas)   
[b]and now 16...c5![/b]
gives Black an equal game at least!

This ...h6 line is a great practical weapon because it can be used against 11.Nxc6 and against 11.b3 move order because White canot avoid the exchange on c6 if he wants to fight for an opening advantage.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #128 - 03/30/10 at 06:16:28
Post Tools
I'm confused by Smyslov Fan's post...

#1) What's the line you have in mind for black that improves on Schandorff's analysis?

#2) Are you expecting a bigger advantage than what's offered?

White's advantage in the Tarrasch in general is always of the nature that black is playable, but white enjoys a static structural plus. Nothing amazing, but nothing to turn white players away, either. The nature of the advantage seems to make some white players uncomfortable though...
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #127 - 03/30/10 at 05:47:13
Post Tools
Ametanoitos wrote on 03/16/10 at 22:53:13:
After Shandorff's 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.g3 Nf6 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O O-O 9.Bg5 c4 10.Ne5 Be6 11.b3  and now

a)11...cxb3 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.axb3 a5! is just a bit better for White but playable and propably drawn with correct play

b) 11...h6! gives Black equality with best play and imo good winning chances in an equal endgame. If anyone is interested i can provide some analysis.
...


I've had a chance now to look at some games.  Schandorff focuses on 11...Qa5.  For all the positive comments on Schandorff's handling of the Tarrasch, especially in the 9...c4 line, I've been disappointed to find that Black seems to get a fully playable game (with a few forced draws for White thrown in).

11...h6 appears to give white a good game from my quick study of games, so yes I am very interested to see what Amet has to say.

Here's one of the latest games in this line:

[Event "Turin ol (Men) 37th"]
[Site "Turin"]
[Date "2006.05.24"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Nielsen, Peter Heine"]
[Black "Rogers, Ian"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D34"]
[WhiteElo "2646"]
[BlackElo "2564"]
[PlyCount "110"]
[EventDate "2006.05.21"]
[EventType "team"]
[EventRounds "13"]
[EventCountry "ITA"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2006.07.31"]
[WhiteTeam "Denmark"]
[BlackTeam "Australia"]
[WhiteTeamCountry "DEN"]
[BlackTeamCountry "AUS"]

1. d4 e6 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. c4 d5 4. g3 c5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. Bg2 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. Nc3
O-O 9. Bg5 c4 10. Ne5 Be6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. b3 cxb3 13. axb3 h6 14. Bxf6 Bxf6
15. Na4 Bf5 16. Qd2 Qd6 
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

17. Nc5!? Rfb8 18. Ra3 Bd8 (18...a5!?) 19. b4 Bb6 20. Rc1 Re8 21. e3
h5 22. h4  g6 23. Qa2!+ Rac8 24. Rac3 Qf6 25. Na4 g5 26. hxg5 Qxg5 27. Nxb6 axb6
28. Rxc6 Rxc6 29. Rxc6 h4 30. gxh4 Qxh4 31. Qxd5 Rxe3 32. Qxf5 Re1+ 33. Bf1
Rxf1+ 34. Kxf1 Qh1+ 35. Ke2 Qxc6 36. b5 Qc4+ 37. Ke3 Kf8 38. Qe5 Qc1+ 39. Kf3
Qd1+ 40. Kf4 Qd2+ 41. Kg3 Qd3+ 42. f3 Qg6+ 43. Kf4 f6 44. Qb8+ Kf7 45. Qc7+ Ke8
46. Qc8+ Ke7 47. Qc7+ Ke8 48. Qb8+ Ke7 49. Qb7+ Kf8 50. Qxb6 Qh6+ 51. Kf5 Qh7+
52. Ke6 Qh3+ 53. Kd6 Qxf3 54. Qc5 Kg7 55. b6 Kg6 1-0

There are of course many other lines after 9...c4 10.Ne5 Be6 to consider, but I'm really focusing on 11.b3 and not finding much for white.  Any ideas on how to improve on Schandorff?

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #126 - 03/17/10 at 15:22:10
Post Tools
Quote:
My question is: how can a position be slightly better but with no winning chances? Rowson has touched this subject in his book Chess for Zebras. The way i see it is that if Black plays like Akobian he has no fears to lose and some winning chances if White overpress for the win. Infact i have discovered a slight improvement over this game when Black can play a slightly more double-edged position. But after all i think that 11.Bf4 is equal.


Reaching a += that's insufficient for a win against accurate defense isn't uncommon theoretically.

The pressure is still on black to play accurately in order to prevent white from winning, and it's not really an indicator of any positive chances black has.

It would be your prototypical two result game, there's a ton of opening variations where black has outstanding drawing chances even if the position is slightly better/easier for white. Lasker's QGD thrives on this very concept.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #125 - 03/17/10 at 12:25:14
Post Tools
What is the first line that you refer to? 9...c4 10.Ne5 Be6 11.Nxc4 i guess. But here the solution is known since Aagaard's book! 11...dxc4 12.Bxf6 Bxf6 13.d5 Qb6! There is also another line given by Khalifman as equal which i don't remember now. The truth may be that Black is slightly better after 11.Nxc4?!

Also the 11.Bf4 move was analysed by Grivas in a CBM article and he gave White a small advantage  in all lines. Sokolov's agrees BUT he says that in the game Sokolov-Akobian, 2007 he had absolutely no winning chances in this slightly better ending!!!

My question is: how can a position be slightly better but with no winning chances? Rowson has touched this subject in his book Chess for Zebras. The way i see it is that if Black plays like Akobian he has no fears to lose and some winning chances if White overpress for the win. Infact i have discovered a slight improvement over this game when Black can play a slightly more double-edged position. But after all i think that 11.Bf4 is equal.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #124 - 03/17/10 at 10:41:48
Post Tools
Ignore the previous question; I've analysed this line and concluded that the rare 11.Bf6 offers absolutely no advantage. 11.Bf4!? is an interesting alternative to the more common 11.Be3, though.

On another note, in Ametanoitos's first line, 11.Nc4!? seems to offer good chances of an edge, e.g. dxc4 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. d5 Bd7 14. dxc6 Bxc6 15. Bxc6 bxc6 16. Qc2 and White's superior pawn structure gives him an edge. I don't have time to analyse this further right now but I think it merits attention since White's other tries haven't given him much if any edge.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #123 - 03/16/10 at 22:53:13
Post Tools
After Shandorff's 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.g3 Nf6 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O O-O 9.Bg5 c4 10.Ne5 Be6 11.b3  and now

a)11...cxb3 12.Nxc6 bxc6 13.axb3 a5! is just a bit better for White but playable and propably drawn with correct play

b) 11...h6! gives Black equality with best play and imo good winning chances in an equal endgame. If anyone is interested i can provide some analysis.

I had promised i'll be back with Mnb's proposal that is 3.Nf3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bf4. I see this line discussed by Gm Flear in the QGD Dangerous weapons book where it is stated that 6...Nf6 7.e3 c4 8.Be2 Be7 (instead of the more popular 8...Bb4) equalises. A simper solution seems to be after the common 8...Bb4 9.O-O O-O 10.Ne5 (Flear's suggestion)  the untested 10...Bxc3 11.bxc3 Nxe5! followed by 12...Ne4
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #122 - 03/14/10 at 02:05:22
Post Tools
Sorry if this was already addressed earlier, but does 11.Bf6 Bf6 12.Nb3 d4 13.Ne4 or 13.Nd5 offer any chances of an advantage for White? Seirawan-Kasparov, 1983 wasn't a successful venture for this line, but 14.Nec5!? looks like an improvement over the game, with the idea of bringing the knight to d3. Whether it offers White anything is another question.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #121 - 03/08/10 at 15:16:37
Post Tools
Yes, we totally agree on that. But it seems that 9...cxd4 requires far more work and preparation than 9...c4. I wanted to make 9...cxd4 10.Nxd4 h6 11.Be3 Bg4 work because i avoid a lot of 12th move alternatives White can play (at least a lot of them are not dangerous). It seems to me now that if i want to play seriously 9...cxd4 i have to study 11...Re8 and all the alternatives of 12.Rc1 which are not toothless (12.Qa4 is the most dangerous of them it seems). I'm quite happy of 12.Rc1 Bg4 though. 

As White i wait to see what Wojo's weapons book gives on 9.b3 which according to my analysis is not so dangerous. If they offer some improvements over current theory i'd definatelly make this my main move as White because i have now a lot or respect in the dynamic chances Black gets in the main lines. Although after my study on the Black side i feel now more ready to play these positions for White.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #120 - 03/08/10 at 15:16:19
Post Tools
BPaulsen wrote on 03/08/10 at 13:38:04:
...Obviously none of us here on this site have elite technique outside of perhaps the GMs, so why worry?


BP, the main reason to worry is that some of us play these lines in correspondence too.  There's a secondary reason to worry in that some players, such as Stefan Buecker, may not be at a par with the elite players but are technically capable of winning from these positions.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #119 - 03/08/10 at 13:38:04
Post Tools
For the record I don't think black can equalize in the 16. Be3 continuation, either, after 14. Bc1 Nb6 15. Qb3 Rc8 16. Be3 Bc5 17. h3 Bh5 (alternatives seem to be agreed to as +=) 18. g4 Bg6 19. g5! hxg5 20. Bxg5 and white will usually end up sacrificing an exchange in order to win the d5 pawn, and getting huge compensation in the process - white at the absolute minimum has the initiative there. As far as I'm concerned 14. Qb3 isn't the only path to an edge.

The edge that white gets in the vast majority of cases is the small technical one that players with really high level of technique (Kramnik, Karpov) can turn into a win.

For the vast majority of people black can play those positions and draw them at worst. This would also explain in large part why the 2700+ crowd avoids 9...cxd4 - those players do run into players with exceptional technique that can win the positions that a lot of us would like to believe (if we support the black side) are equal/unclear with our level of knowledge (or if we're lazy - computer assessment).

Unless you're going to be facing Kramnik there's no reason to avoid 9...cxd4. Being completely objective even if black has some counterplay it's fair to say white, with accurate play, should have an advantage sufficient for real winning chances if your technique is elite.

Obviously none of us here on this site have elite technique outside of perhaps the GMs, so why worry?
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ametanoitos
God Member
*****
Offline


The road to success is
under construction

Posts: 1429
Location: Patras
Joined: 01/04/05
Re: The Tarrasch in Black and White
Reply #118 - 03/08/10 at 08:49:25
Post Tools
It seems that the discussion we had with BPaulsen and Buecker is not useless for the Black player (it is certainly not useless for the White player!).

To remind you, we came (or should i say, i came) to the conlusion that Black cannot equalise after 9...cxd4 10.Nxd4 h6 11.Be3 Bg4 12.Qa4 Na5 13.Rad1 Nc4 14.Qb3! and now we have a prosime by Mr.Buecker that he will post the refutation of 14...Qd7  Smiley

BUT Black can play 11...Re8 12.Rc1 (ofcourse there are alternatives here with the most dangerous being 12.Qa4 as Cox proposes) and now 12...Bg4 seems nice (this is what Davies recommends but he only touches upon this move with a game not well played by White).
After 13.Nb3 we will transpose to Petrosian-Spassky as discussed and after 13.Qa4 Na5 14.Rcd1 Nc4 and i see no problem for Black when i compare it with the lines we discussed because Black has gained the usefull move Re8! Also now 15.Qb3 Nxe3 seems playable after 16.fxe3 Qd7 because of this (not so small) detail. Also 14.Rfd1 is not critical after 14...Nc4.

So, what current theory thinks of 12...Bg4? I see that Khalifman gives 13.h3 Be6 (11...Bg4 12.h3 is not to be feared for Black according to Sokolov but now the position for Black is not so easy) 14.Kh2 (Sokolov also mentions this) 14...Qd7 15.Qa4 a6! (Khalifman analyses all other moves as inferior ones and i agree. Now Black want to play ...b5 with counterplay, so he forces White to play...) 16.Nxc6! bxc6 17.Rfd1 and White is slightly better in all lines according to Khalifman (the main idea is Bd4+e4) and the practice has confirmed this evaluation. But, Black has some interesting ideas here! One i like is 17...h5!? 18.Bd4 h4 19.e4 when the position is unclear to my eyes. Another possible improvement is 17...Bf5 18.Bd4 Qb7! when 19.e4 Nxe4 is equal and 19.Re1 Red8! 20.e4 Nxe4 gets the same evaluation. After 18...Qb7 there is only one game in my database that continues 19.Rd2 but after 19...Rab8 or 19...Rac8 i think that the position holds dynamic chances for Black adequate to call it unlear or equal.

I have switched to the study of 9...c4 now but i think that 9...cxd4 is underestimated. Even after 10.Nxd4 h6 11.Be3 (11.Bf4=) Re8 12.Rc1 Bf8 if we assume that White's best is 13.Na4 (according to Sokolov in every other variation Black equalises) and Rizzitano's improvenet is the best White can get, i'm quite happy with Black's chances here! I tried to play the position after Rizzitano's proposal but , although Black is a bit worse, i didn't find a way for White to get through. Maybe i cannot do this because my level of play is not high enough but i still think that Black's not without chances.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 43
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo