IMJohnCox wrote on 05/12/10 at 22:24:32:
As trw says, my, er, great work deals with the position JhF mentions. This is the normal move order of ...Be7 systems, and many people think 11 Bg5 is the acid test, though I don't agree myself. Other sources are Kaufman's Chess Advantage in Black and White and Kritz's article in Chessbase Monthly, I forget which number but I think there's a search facility on the site.
You should know that WY had his own peculiarly nihilistic handling of this line, as compared to Kritz, for example. Basically he simply used to allow Nxe6 fxe6 and the exchange of all the rooks and play a bishop ending without forcing any concessions from White, something I rather warned against in my book. Kritz tends not to let this happen. The games you need to look at to evaluate WY's plan are Adams-WY (twice, I think, and certainly among other similar ones) and then Jakovenko-WY, in which Black's treatment met its Waterloo. I haven't noticed WY playing it since, though I stand to be corrected.
FWIW, if you can get hold of the correspondence and freestyle games of Topalov's second Jiri Dufek and another Czech CC player, Roman Chytilek, they will be very helpful. I am unsure how readily available these are, though.
My view is that this is not a terribly attractive way to play the Berlin, but there's no doubt it's a really, really tough nut to crack for White, and if you don't mind rather prospectless but equal or only very slightly worse positions, you couldn't do better.
We are honored with the man himself!
Firstly, where do I get those games you mentioned from CC. I would like to see them.
On the point of Jakovenko-WY. It was analyzed (poorly) in one of the USCF magazines... but then WY managed to correct it himself with the following game... improving.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1539956 20... Ke8
WY seems to have played the Berlin 11 times with 0 record 2+ 2- 7= but it seems to be his main weapon in the Ruy. Also he seems to have played it 5 times since he lost to jakovenko. At least these stats are according to my database which i'm in the process of updating.
While we have the man Cox himself here... I would love to ask you about a variation to which you only devoted a page
but called it the possible future of the Berlin. It seems to have exploded in correspondence recently although the only high level OTB encounter is a Shirov-Kramnik blitz game.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1479672I present my follow cc game in this line, in hopes of hearing your thoughts regarding this move! I hope you find my cc game a treat. I am proud of this one!
I was white here:
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1983"]
[BlackElo "2190"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.Nc3 Ke8 10.h3 b6 11.Rd1 Be6 (to my knowledge this was a novelty) 12.Ne2 Bd5 13.Ne1 Rd8 14.b3 c5 15.g4 Nh4 16.Nf4 Bc6 17.Bb2 Be7 18.Nh5 Rg8 19.f4 Nf3+ 20.Nxf3 Bxf3 21.Rxd8+ Bxd8 22.Kf2 Bc6 23.Rd1 Bh4+ 24.Kf1 a5 25.c4 a4 26.Rd2 axb3 27.axb3 h6 28.Bc3 Be7 29.Re2 g6 30.Nf6+ Bxf6 31.exf6 Kd8 32.Re7 Rf8 33.Be5 Bd7 34.Kf2 Kc8 35.Kg3 Kd8 36.Kh4 Kc8 37.f5 gxf5 38.gxf5 c6 39.Bf4 Bxf5 40.Bxh6 1-0
I should also mention I've been employing this 10... b6 idea of Kramnik alot more recently than my previous 10... h6. so far results show in my play 0+ 0- 10= as black with 10... b6 as white I have 1+ 0- 1= against 10... b6 but as black with 10... h6 I have 5+ 0- 5= so I feel like 10... h6 provides more practical chances simply because its not committal... but 10.. b6 is a very interesting idea! Hard to break.