bigbelly wrote on 08/13/11 at 01:11:49:
Bpaulsen, earlier you stated “Korchnoi is a hardcore MacCutcheon advocate these days.’
So I thought it might be relevant to point out that Korchnoi played the classical about as often as the Mac - with similar success. Just because the Mac is more popular at the moment doesn’t mean much - it’s more just a matter of fashion.
Oh lord. Where to start...
#1) Going by the chesslive.de database he plays the MacCutcheon more, so nice try on the equivocation. He also plays the Burn more often than the Classical.
The line is so awesome that every time he gets the chance to play it...he usually avoids it for other options!
#2) Fashion is dictated heavily by current theoretical assessment. GMs do not make it a habit to face other GMs of equal strength in lines that are under pressure, because that'd make zero sense.
#3) If a GM does use a line under pressure it's usually against a lower rated opponent. Where oh where can I find an example of this? ... Oh yeah! It's in
every single game you cited. Quote:You claim that White can force a greater edge against the Classical than against the Burn or Mac, but you refuse to back it up with variations. I believe you like the Burn or Mac better than the classical, but so what.
I don't need to back it up with variations because anyone can do the research themselves, plus that isn't the point of the thread. Did you see the thread-starter asking for long variations? No, you didn't.
And if you knew anything at all you'd know I don't really particularly
like anything when it comes to theoretical assessments.
...
Edited: Comments deleted by SF, 8/12/2011