JEH wrote on 04/24/13 at 12:49:42:
Although my link was a little tongue in cheek, there's an element of advice in there.
My first 1. e4 opening was the Scotch, then later adding the Italian (playing Bc4 after ed as well) because I didn't think I was ready for the Lopez. I'm very pleased to have got a work out with those openings in my early days, and it's also helped playing 1. ...e5 as Black.
Adopting the Lopez as White came much much later. Back in the day I used to look at White's positions and not understand why with pieces grovelling and wriggling around on the back two ranks and Black's pieces all developed on nice squares why White was supposed to be better. When the penny dropped, I thought I was ready for the Lopez.
I started taking it all on, mainline, but with an h3 anti-Marshall, a la Khalifmann. But although I had interesting games, I thought I'd bitten off too much, and started retreating into initially Qe2 Worrall systems, and then d3 systems.
Going back over it again, if I could reboot this process, I think I'd start with a 5. d3 Slowpez (which seems to me to have a little more synergy with moving onto mainlines later than 5. Qe2), and then add in mainline systems one by one. So once ready for the Open Lopez, I can go say 6. d3 (or 6. Qe2), and so on, pushing d3 (or Qe2) later into the game, if at all.
If I was going to think this even further back, and say I didn't want to start my e4 e5 career with the Scotch or the Italian etc, then d4 based Lopez's are another possibility.
If you are going to use the learning Lopez with stabilisers approach, then d3 or Qe2 could be just as good. You could use McDonald's book for d3 and Greet's book for Qe2.
But considering how much these slower systems, especially d3 are cropping up at the highest levels, then maybe they are stabilisers at all