kylemeister wrote on 05/05/09 at 19:56:39:
I wonder what Rybka "intends" after 9...Qb6 10. Nc2, which as far as I know has long been considered slightly better for White.
I'm reminded that, according to Drazen Marovic, Leonid Stein was of the firm opinion that 8...Na6 is more promising than 8...Nc6 (a view with which Nunn seemed to agree about a decade ago).
Yes but Timothy Taylor made Marovic look like an idiot in his book on Beating The Kid, indeed he convincingly blew quite a big hole in the often quoted Krzisnik - Marovic 1963, which theory holds as equal for Black but in reality he is close to dead lost.
Regarding 9...Qb6 I agree that theory holds that White is much better after 10.Nc2, but considering that Rybka is now the World's strongest player could signal that that assesment needs revising. As we speak I have Rybka working on it. While on the subject of Rybka, When GM Jan Gustafson was asked in New In Chess 2009/2 who his favorite player of all time was, his depressing answer was quote "Rybka 3. Sad but true".
Chess is currently experiencing a renaissance whereby none of the old theory in sharp openings can be trusted and everything has to be re-evaluated through modern technological eyes. Its as if chess is reborn.
Just to clarify, my problem is not finding equality for black in this line, but rather trying to avoid a sterile position. In general players that opt for this line as White are usually the weaker player trying to make a draw against a stronger opponent, no disrespect to Timothy Taylor who did show that if Black goes crazy he would be punished.
Toppy